:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:擇偶歷程中影響關係發展的關鍵因素
書刊名:中華輔導與諮商學報
作者:張思嘉 引用關係李雅雯
作者(外文):Chang, Szu-chiaLee, Ya-wen
出版日期:2009
卷期:25
頁次:頁179-212
主題關鍵詞:性別差異擇偶歷程關係階段關係類型關鍵因素Critical eventsGender differenceMate selectionRelationship stageRelationship type
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:134
  • 點閱點閱:162
本研究主要目的是藉由夫妻雙方的參與,了解在擇偶過程中影響關係發展的關鍵因素,並分析不同性別、關係發展階段及關係發展類型在知覺這些關鍵因素上的差異。以深度訪談法進行資料收集,並將訪談內容轉為量化資料,共訪問70對新婚夫妻。研究結果發現:在擇偶過程中對兩人關係造成影響的因素可分為四類,分別為(一)個人認知因素:包含個人對理想配偶的標準及對理想婚姻或關係的期待等兩個次類別;(二)關係互動因素:包含一起從事的活動、單方或雙方的自我揭露及溝通、共同興趣及價值觀、衝突或爭執、單雙方對關係階段的重新定義、親密行為等六個次類別;(三)社交網絡因素:包含家人的支持或反對、家中發生的事件、朋友或其他重要他人、第三者及社會比較等五個次類別;(四)環境外力因素:包含天災、社會制度、經濟狀況、距離、超自然的力量、宗教信仰與習俗等七個次類別。在這四大類因素中,又以關係互動因素所佔比例最高,顯示在擇偶過程中雙方的互動對關係的發展有很大的影響。其次,在台灣適婚男女的擇偶歷程中,雙方父母及其他社交網絡中成員的看法仍有重要的影響力。最後,本研究也發現,影響關係發展的關鍵因素會因性別、關係發展階段及關係類型而有差異。研究者並討論上述結果對於日後研究發展方向及實務工作的啟發。
The purpose of this study was to investigate critical events that affect relationship development during mate selection processes. Seventy newly-married couples participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to remember as accurately as possible the events which led to their decision to marry and explain why each event resulted in increasing or decreasing of commitment. Researchers read each transcript and generated four categories of subjective inferences. Intrapersonal factors were explanations in which the partner and the relationship are evaluated against some personal standards. Dyadic factors included behavior and subjective interdependence, conflict, self-disclosure, and redefinitions of the stage of involvement. Social network factors made references to interaction with or attributions about third parties such as relatives, friends, and other dating partners. Circumstantial factors were anticipated or unanticipated events over which the person had little or no control, and which stemmed from institutions or forces external to the person or their relationships. Results indicated that both dyadic and social network factors were important in marital decision during the mate selection processes for Taiwanese couples. Gender, stage, and relationship type differences in partners' references were also found.
期刊論文
1.Murstein, B. I.(1970)。Stimulus-value-role: A Theory of Marital Choice。Journal of Marriage and the Family,32,465-481。  new window
2.Lewis, Robert A.(1973)。A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation。Journal of Marriage and the Family,35(1),16-25。  new window
3.張思嘉(20011200)。擇偶歷程與婚前關係的形成與發展。中華心理衛生學刊,14(4),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉惠琴(20010900)。大學生戀愛關係的維持歷程。中華心理衛生學刊,14(3),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.卓紋君(20001200)。臺灣人愛情發展的歷程初探兼論兩性輔導之重點。諮商輔導文粹,5,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kerckhoff, A. C.、Davis, K. E.(1962)。Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection。American Sociological Review,27(3),295-303。  new window
7.莊耀嘉(20020600)。擇偶條件與性心理之性別差異:演化論的檢驗。中華心理學刊,44(1),75-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.謝文宜(20060900)。為什麼結婚:國內將婚伴侶婚姻承諾考量因素之探討。中華輔導學報,20,51-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.郭士賢、張思嘉(20040600)。華人生活世界中的多面向因果思維。本土心理學研究,21,233-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.潘麗琪(1999)。日五專學生愛情態度之研究:以八十六學年度某科四、五年級學生擇偶行為為例。華醫學報,10,43-54。  延伸查詢new window
11.Berardo, F. M.(1990)。Trends and directions in family research in the 1980s。Journal of Marriage and the Family,52,809-817。  new window
12.Chang, S.,、Chan, C.(2007)。Perceptions of commitment change during mate selection: The case of Taiwanese newlyweds。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,24,55-68。  new window
13.Lewis, R. A.(1972)。A developmental framework for the analysis of premarital dyadic formation。Family Process,11,17-48。  new window
14.Milardo, R. M.(2000)。The decade in review。Journal of Marriage and the Family,62(4),873-875。  new window
15.Reiss, I. L.(1960)。Toward a sociology of the heterosexual love relationship。Marriage and Family Living,22,139-145。  new window
16.Segal, M. W.(1974)。Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of pro-pinquity in a field setting。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,30,654-657。  new window
17.Surra, C. A.(1987)。Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship type。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,4,17-33。  new window
18.Surra, C. A.(1990)。Research and theory on mate selection and premarital relationships in the 1980s。Journal of Marriage and the Family,52,844-865。  new window
19.Surra, C. A.,、Hughes, D. K.(1997)。Commitment processes in accounts of the develop-ment of premarital relationships。Journal of Marriage and the Family,59,5-21。  new window
20.Winch, R. F.(1955)。The theory of complementary needs in mate selection: Final results on the test of the general hypothesis。American Sociological Review,20,552-555。  new window
會議論文
1.Yi, C.,、Chan, C.(2007)。The social basis of mate selection patterns in Tai-wan: Its linkage to marital satisfaction。Taipei。  new window
學位論文
1.謝豐存(2001)。虛擬世界擇偶--以配對網站的異性交往為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林鴻達(1989)。臺灣都市山地青年擇偶態度、行為與問題之研究:以北部都市山地教會未婚青年為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳素琴(2000)。阿美族中學生婚姻態度及擇偶條件之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.于德林(2004)。認識方式與教育、族群婚姻配對—以介紹人為例,台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.李少珍(1982)。工廠青年交友與擇偶之研究,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Byrne, Donn Erwin(1971)。The attraction paradigm。Academic Press。  new window
2.蔡文輝(1998)。婚姻與家庭:家庭社會學。臺北:五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.葉肅科(2000)。一樣的婚姻,多樣的家庭。臺北:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Whyte, William H. Jr.(1956)。The Organization Man。Garden City, NY:Doubleday Anchor Books。  new window
5.高淑貴(1991)。家庭社會學。臺北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Berger, B. L.(1998)。Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.)。Boston。  new window
7.Huston, T. L., Surra, C., Fitzgerald, N.,、Cate, R.(1981)。From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process。Personal relationship 2: Developing personal relationship。London。  new window
8.Surra, C. A.,、Huston, T. L.(1987)。Mate selection as a social transition。Intimate relations。Newbury Park。  new window
9.Winch, R. F.(1958)。Mate selection。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.伊慶春、熊瑞梅(1994)。擇偶過程之網絡與婚姻關係:對介紹人、婚姻配對、和婚姻滿意度之分析。臺灣社會的民眾意向:社會科學的分析。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE