:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人社會關係互動中的緣觀認知運作歷程與因應行動探討
作者:徐欣萍
作者(外文):Hsin-Ping Hsu
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
指導教授:黃光國
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:心理調適因應關係互動copingfatefate in relationshippsychological adjustmentrelational interaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:95
在華人社會的常民生活世界裡,許多文化知識常會透過自動化的心理捷思歷程進行運作,隨著時間累積便成為多數人共享的思維模式或問題因應習慣,進而成為有別於其他社會的文化心態與內在認知基模,最終成為特有的自我療癒方式。華人社會由於深受「關係主義」影響,於是在關係互動的問題處理上常與西方「個人主義」式作法相當不同,我們常在生活經驗中發現,民眾遇到關係互動問題時,極容易提取而出的文化知識為「緣觀信念」,透過訴諸「緣分」轉化因為關係互動事件造成的負面感受或挫折,使其成為當下對抗焦慮的認知模式並能促發後續調適行動。
在此背景下,本論文擬將「緣觀信念」、「關係互動」及「心理適應」等三大主題串連後進行探討。首先建構一個「嘗試性理論架構」,藉由對「緣觀信念」的辯證式認知運作歷程分析,來解釋與預測華人在面對情感關係互動問題時,可能具有的認知狀態與理想因應行動,並以此作為後續實徵研究的前導詮釋觀點。
研究一採用「多元尺度分析」找出「緣觀信念」的三大潛在結構為:「關係知覺」、「神奇知覺」及「外在知覺」;研究二採用「因素分析」進行「緣觀信念量表」編修,並得到「認命型緣觀」與「知命型緣觀」兩大因素構面;研究三採用「典型相關分析」進行理論架構的初步驗證,探討「緣觀信念」與「理想因應行動」之關聯,共抽取出二組典型因素達到顯著,第一組典型因素為:「能動內控信念 vs. 盡己式承擔行動」;第二組典型因素為:「宿命外控信念 vs. 體知式承受行動」。研究四採用「質化訪談分析」,發現「緣觀信念」可作為關係創傷後復原歷程之認知介入因子,具有潛在的應用價值。
希冀本論文能提供一個理解華人文化社會處理關係互動問題時的詮釋架構與實務應用參考,文末並提出研究限制與省思建議。
My doctoral dissertation focuses on theory construction and empirical studies. I propose that the belief in yuan (the Chinese concept of determinism in social relationships), typically occurs during an interpersonal event and is based on two aspects of the mandate of heaven: ren-ming (acceptance of fate) and zhi-ming (knowing fate), which combine cultural knowledge from Buddhism, Daoism, and Confucianism to make the belief in yuan a feature of dialectical thinking, as well as help people to adopt suitable coping strategies to achieve psychological adjustment in response to problems that arise from interpersonal interactions.
I completed four substudies to describe and validate this model. Three psychological structures of the belief in yuan (i.e., the perception of relationship, the perception of miraculous feeling, and the perception of living world) were shown in Study 1. To validate the model of this study, a scale was constructed to analyze the association between the belief in yuan and the ideal coping actions performed by people in Chinese society (Study 2 and Study 3). Study 4 was a qualitative study that proved the practical healing function of the belief in yuan.
The expected innovation and contribution that results from the dissertation will be to broaden the subjectivity of social psychology in the Eastern world, and to dialogue with the Western academic league by combining existing psychological knowledge and Eastern cultural views. In addition, I hope that the results will be of practical benefit to local people and psychological practitioners in Taiwan.
王邦雄(1987):《再論緣與命》。臺北:漢光。new window

王保進(2004):《多變量分析--套裝程式與資料分析》。臺北:高等教育文化。

朱嘉琪、鄔佩麗(1998):〈台灣婦女女性意識發展歷程之研究:以三位女性主義者的生命故事為例〉。《教育心理學報》,30(1),51-71。new window

李沛良(1995):〈中國文化的宿命主義與能動取向〉。見喬健、潘乃谷(主編):《中國人的觀念與行為》。天津:天津人民出版社。

李新民、陳密桃(2006):〈實用智能、緣分信念與心理健康、工作表現之相關以幼兒教師為例〉。《中華心理學刊》,48(2),183-202。new window

李新民、陳密桃(2009):〈緣分信念與心理幸福感的關係--聚合構念為因與果的結構方程模式分析初探〉。《測驗學刊》,56(4),457-489。new window

李威運(2005):《親密關係初期緣感的表徵事件與影響》。世新大學社會心理學研究所,碩士論文。

李敏龍、楊國樞(1998):〈中國人的忍:概念分析與實徵研究〉。《本土心理學研究》,10,3-68。new window

李昀真(2009):《大學生樂觀、緣分風格與正向面對分手之相關研究》。臺北教育大學心理與諮商研究所,碩士論文。

李茂能(2006):《結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用》。臺北:心理。

余安邦、余德慧(2013):〈人文諮商做為臨床本土化的實踐路線:遠去是為了歸來〉。《應用心理研究》,58,187-231。new window

沈清松(2002):《對比、外推與交談》。臺北:五南。

阿部正雄(Abe, M., n. d. / 2003):《佛教》(張智強譯)。臺北:麥田。

林耀盛(2011):〈本土化、西方化與全球化:本土臨床心理學的研發進程〉。《本土心理學研究》,35,145-188。new window

林曉芳(2014):《多變量分析在社會科學領域之應用--SPSS操作與資料分析》。臺北:鼎茂。

尚會鵬、游國龍(2010):《心理文化學--許烺光學說的研究與應用》。臺北:南天。

吳明隆(2009):《結構方程模式:方法與實務運用》。高雄:麗文。

吳芝儀(1999):〈諮商研究的方法與現況〉。見中正大學教育學研究所(主編):《教育學研究方法論》。高雄:麗文。

胡治洪(2009):〈從修身成德到家國事功--論大學之道〉。《臺灣東亞文明研究學刊》,6(2),193-220。new window

姚開屏、陳坤虎(1998):〈如何編制一份問卷--以健康相關生活品質問卷為例〉。《職能治療學會雜誌》,16,1-24。

張思嘉、周玉慧(2004):〈緣與婚前關係的發展〉。《本土心理學研究》,21,85-123。new window

徐欣萍(2012):〈華人關係互動中的緣分運作及其心理適應歷程〉。《本土心理學研究》,37,57-97。new window

徐欣萍、黃光國(2013):〈大學生緣觀構念研究與對本土化諮商的啟示〉。《教育心理學報》,45(2),241-260。new window

陳美雀(2004):《雙軸因應模式之探討》。政治大學心理學研究所,碩士論文。

陳寬裕、王正華(2010):《結構方程模型分析實務AMOS的運用》。臺北:五南。

陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2011):《多變量分析方法:統計軟體應用》(6版)。臺北:五南。

許文耀、陳美雀、林克、曾幼涵、孫頌賢(2006):〈社會脈絡下的因應及其與適應的關係--探討雙軸向或多軸向因應模式在臺灣的運用〉(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告編號:NSC94-2413-H-004-003)。臺北:國科會。

許木柱、李舒中 (1998):〈台灣心理人類學的展望〉。發表於探索台灣田野的新面貌研討會,中央研究院民族所。

郭士賢、張思嘉(2004):〈華人生活世界的多面向因果思維〉。《本土心理學研究》,21,233-267。new window

傅佩榮(2013):《止於至善:傅佩榮談大學‧中庸》。臺北:天下。

黃光國(2010):《反求諸己--現代社會中的修養》。臺北:洪葉。new window

黃光國(2011a):〈論含攝文化的心理學〉。《本土心理學研究》,36,79-110。new window

黃光國(2011b):《心理學的科學革命方案》。臺北:心理。new window

黃光國(2013a):〈儒家文化中的倫理療癒〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》,37,1-54。new window

黃光國(2013b):《社會科學的理路--第三版》。臺北:心理。

黃囇莉(1996):〈中國人的和諧觀/衝突觀:和諧化辯證觀之研究取徑〉。《本土心理學研究》,5,47-71。new window

黃囇莉(2006):《人際和諧與衝突--本土化的理論與研究》。臺北:揚智。new window

黃芳銘(2004):《社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式》。臺北:五南。
楊國樞(2005):〈人際關係中的緣觀〉。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):《華人本土心理學(下)》。臺北:遠流。new window

趙舒禾、陳秉華(2013):〈不執著量表在臺灣之中文化信、效度分析及其與心理健康之關係〉。《教育心理學報》,45(1),121-139。new window

駱月絹、黃囇莉、林以正、黃光國(2010):〈盼望的雙元性--新盼望量表之建構及效度檢證〉。《中華心理學刊》,52(3),265-285。new window

費孝通(1948):《鄉土中國》。上海:觀察社。

葉光輝(2002):〈關係主義:論華人人際互動關係的要素〉。見葉啟政(主編):《從現代到本土》。臺北:遠流。

翟學偉(1993):〈中國人際關係的特質:本土概念及其模式〉。《社會學研究》,4,74-83。

釋慧岳、釋德嘉、陳慶餘、釋宗惇、釋惠敏(2008)。〈化悲傷為祝福。安寧療護雜誌〉,13(2),168-184。new window

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th Ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Archer, M. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-95.

Bateman, T., & Crant, J. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.

Beck, A. T. (1989). Love is never enough: How couples can overcome misunderstandings, resolve conflicts, and solve relationship problems through cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (A. Mattew, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307-336.

Bridges, M. R. (2006). Activating the corrective emotional experience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 551-568.

Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,267-283.

Chang, H. C., & Holt, G. R. (1991). The concept of yuan and Chinese interpersonal relationship. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Cross-culture interpersonal communication (pp.28-57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Chen, P. H. (2009). A counseling model for self-relation coordination for Chinese clients with interpersonal conflicts. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 987-1009.

Cheng, C. (2003). Cognitive and motivational processes underlying coping flexibility: A dual-process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 425-438.

Cheng, C. (2009). Dialectical thinking and coping flexibility: A multi method approach. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 471-494.

Clarke, A. T. (2006). Coping with interpersonal stress and psychosocial health among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 11-24.

Crant J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26,435-462.

DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Folkman, S., & Moskowitz J. T. (2004) Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55,745-774.

Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B., (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77-94). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-45.

Goodwin, R., & Findlay, C. (1997). “We were just fates together”. Chinese love and the concept of yuan in England and Hong Kong. Personal Relationship, 4, 85-92.

Green, P. E., Carmone, F. J., & Smith, S. M. (1989). Multidimensional scaling: Concepts and applications. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Harris, G. G. (1989). Concepts of individual, self, and person in description and analysis. American Anthropologist, 91 (3), 599-612.

Henrich J., Heine S. J., & Norenzayan A. (2010a). The weirdest people in the world? Behavior Brain Science, 33 (2-3), 61-83.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010b). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33 (2-3), 111-135.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010c). Most people are not WEIRD.Nature, 466, 29.

Hobfoll, S. E., Dunahoo, C. L., Ben-Porath, Y., & Monnier, J. (1994). Gender and coping : The dual-axial model of coping. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 49-82.

Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychosocial homeostasis and Jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73 (1), 23-44.

Hsu Francis L. K. (1972). Psychological anthropology. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing.

Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. Marsella, G. DeVos, 8c F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self. New York, NY: Tavistock.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Hwang, K. K. (2009). The development of indigenous counseling in contemporary Confucian communities. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 930-943.

Hwang, K. K., & Chang, J. (2009). Self-Cultivation: Culturally sensitive psychotherapies in Confucian societies. The Counseling Psychologist. 37(7), 1010-1032.

Hwang, K. K. (2011a). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. New York, NY: Springer.

Hwang, K. K. (2011b). The mandala model of self. Psychological Studies. 56(4), 329-334.

Hwang, K. K. (1978). The dynamic processes of coping with interpersonal conflicts in a Chinese society. Proceedings of the National Science Council of Taiwan, 2(2), 198-208.

Jones, D. (2010). A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists'' studies. Science, 328(5986), 1627.

Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.

Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M.(1978). Multidimensional scaling: quantitative applications in the social sciences. London : Sage.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer.

Leung, S. A., & Chen, P. H. (2009). Counseling psychology in Chinese communities in Asia: Indigenous, multicultural, and cross-cultural considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 944-966.

Linehan, M. M., Comtois, K. A., Murray, A. M., Brown, M. Z., Gallop, R. J., et al. (2006). Two-Year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs. therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and Borderline Personality Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 757-766.

Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 927-935.

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.

Parkes, K. R.(1994). Personality and coping as moderators of work stress processes: Models, methods and measures. Work & Stress, 8, 110-129.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999) . Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.

Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York, NY: Viking Press.

Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.

Shils, E. (1981). Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Shweder, R., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R., Markus, H., & Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol.1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9, 41-42.

Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Teyber, E. (2000). Interpersonal process in psychotherapy: A relational approach. Belmont, CA: Brooks / Cole.

Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Shen, Q. S. (1994). Confucianism, Taoism and constructive realism. Vienna: Vienna University Press.

Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O., & Lenz, E. (1991). Measurement in nursing research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

Yang, K. S., & Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). The role of yuan in Chinese social life: A conceptual and empirical analysis. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology, (pp. 263-281). New York, NY: Praeger.

Young, F. W., &. Hamer, R. M. (1987). Multidimensional scaling: History, theory and applications. New York, NY: Erlbaum.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE