:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:明儒高攀龍的思想與殉節
書刊名:中央大學人文學報
作者:吳振漢 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chen-han
出版日期:2009
卷期:37
頁次:頁29-67
主題關鍵詞:高攀龍王學東林學派靜坐殉節Kao P'an-lungWang Yangming schoolTung-ling academyMeditationMartyrdom
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:663
  • 點閱點閱:69
高攀龍係明末東林書院的領袖,望重士林,其思想學術受到推崇,不屈殉節的精神更受到明末清初士人的倣效。然當代對他思想的研究,往往受到史料的誤導,不能呈現他承襲「王學」菁華且發揚光大之面向,大都強調他復興「程朱之學」,主張經世致用的表象。本文第一章從史料剖析著手,試圖重構其思想之全貌,賦予他理學史上的新定位。第二章依時間序列,分階段探討攀龍思想之成長,並分析其中幾次重大轉折的時代背景。本章尤其注重探析他以靜坐和悟解為主的治學路徑,借以說明他與「程朱」學者之差異。第三章論述攀龍之殉節緣由和過程。就行為而言,他與同時遭「閹禍」諸君子不同處在於,他未赴逮便已先投水自盡,成全刑不上大夫之氣節。就所殉對象而言,他與明亡殉國諸臣的差別在於,他是殉以忠君愛國為核心的整個儒家價值體系,而非僅一朝一君。此外攀龍殉死具宗教層面的緣由,此標示出他與元儒或清儒有所不同。綜而言之,明末「王學」末流狂放縱恣,流弊已現。攀龍與東林同志起而力矯其弊,但他治學取徑實仍不出「王學」矩矱。清儒痛憤明儒清談誤國,將東林諸賢形塑成經世務實之學者,遂誤失攀龍學思淵源之主脈,也輕忽了正統明儒學問得力之處。
Kao P'an-lung (Gao Panlong) was one of the leaders of the Tung-lin Academy which possessed nation-wide celebrity in the late Ming. His thought and spirit were admired by many scholars during the transition of the Ming and Ch'ing dynasties. However, most historical materials about him, compiled by his progeny and disciples, were biased to shaped him as a Ch'eng-Chu School follower and adhered merely to the practical learnings. Chapter One thus tries to reconstruct the outlines of his scholarship and relocate his position in Chinese intellectual history. Chapter Two deals with, according to the time sequence, several crucial stages of P'an-lung's intellectual growth, and the backgrounds of those conversions. The chapter especially emphasizes on the meditation and inner enlightenment, two tools through which he used to approach the Neo-Confucian truth. Chapter Three probes into the martyrdom occurred at the end of his life. P'an-lung, different from his peers who were tortured to death by the eunuchs' gang, committed suicide before the Imperial Guards apprehended him to prevent the emperor to be blamed that he killed his loyal minister. P'an-lung's death contained many religious elements which could hardly find in Ch'ing Confucians. In general, some followers of the Wang Yang-ming School degraded their trainings and morality, and, as a result, they were harshly criticized by Tung-ling scholars, among them P'an-lung was an eminent one. Many Ch’ing scholars, who ascribed the fall of the Ming dynasty to the futile learnings of Ming scholars, praised P'an-lung as a practical Confucian. But, unfortunately, they misunderstood his thought and scholarship, and underestimated the merits of those authentic Ming Confucians as well.
期刊論文
1.吳振漢(2008)。高攀龍與王國維之死比較分析。史匯,12,1-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.步近智、張安奇(1998)。顧憲成高攀龍評傳。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.高攀龍。高子未刻稿。  延伸查詢new window
3.陸稼書(1986)。三魚堂文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.錢士升(2000)。賜餘堂集。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王重民(198604)。中國善本書提要。上海市:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.高攀龍、陳龍正(1986)。高子遺書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉宗周、戴璉璋、吳光、鍾彩鈞(1997)。劉宗周全集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃宗羲(1974)。明儒學案。臺北:河洛圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.魏大中(2000)。藏密齋集。北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳龍正(2000)。幾亭全書。北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.張廷玉(1974)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.(2003)。中華歷史人物別傳集(23)。中華歷史人物別傳集(23)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
13.高世寧、高世泰(1999)。高忠憲公年譜。北京:北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.梁啟超(1999)。中國近三百年學術史。中國近三百年學術史。北京。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.傅武光(1991)。高攀龍。高攀龍。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.錢穆(1986)。記公安三袁論學。中國學術思想論叢(七)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.鍾彩鈞(1998)。劉蕺山學術思想論集。劉蕺山學術思想論集。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)黃卬(1972)。錫金識小錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)吳桂森(1995)。息齋筆記,上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1983)。守護國界主陀羅尼經,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1985)。清世宗實錄,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)李應昇(2000)。落落齋遺集,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)華允誠(2005)。高忠憲公年譜,南京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊儒賓(19980000)。死生與義理--劉宗周與高攀龍的承諾。劉蕺山學術思想論集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE