臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣經濟與人權發展之辯證關係--以漢生病病患為例
書刊名：臺灣民主季刊
作者：李有容 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Yu-jung
出版日期：2009
卷期：6:2
頁次：頁169-209
主題關鍵詞：漢生病病患；經濟發展；灰關連分析；人權；Leprosy patient；Economic development；Grey relation analysis；Human rights
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:75
樂生療養院的爭議在近年來引發了各界的關注，爭議的焦點主要集中在三方面—人權保障、經濟發展、古蹟保存。對於人權保障的焦點著重於政府在處理漢生病病患的立場與方式是否得當；經濟發展則關注新莊捷運之興建、通車之快慢；古蹟保存則強調療養院內的建築之珍貴。基本上，本文試圖從台灣人權發展的歷史脈絡出發，解釋人權保障與經濟發展的關係。儘管相關研究指出人權保障與經濟發展呈現正相關，但受限於人權定義與內容的複雜，導致經濟發展與人權保障在台灣，是否如同先前研究般呈現正相關，值得進一步檢證。由於漢生病病患的權益可以被視為人權當中的一個子議題，因此本文試圖檢證的是，若經濟發展與人權狀況如前人之研究般呈現正相關，此推論是否也一併適用於人權當中的子議題？ 利用「灰色關連方法」釐清台灣的經濟發展、人權運動與政府對漢生病病患之處置之關係。文中除發現三者伴隨著時間的演進均呈現了正向的發展外，從其灰關連度可知，儘管漢生議題在台灣已被認定為一人權議題，但實際上卻更受制於經濟發展的左右。
The dispute over the protection of the Laosheng Leprosarium and the development of the Mass Rapid Transit in Taipei County has attracted public attention, which gave way to debates over human rights protection, economic development and the need to preserve historical interest in Taiwan. This paper thus aims to reveal the relation between the protection of human rights and economic development. Previous studies indicate a positive connection between these two variables, which this paper attempts to reconfirm through the case of leprosy patients in Taiwan. As the rights of leprosy patients have been recognized as legitimate human rights in recent years; this paper sketches its history and its relationship with other human rights issues in Taiwan. It proposes to examine whether the positive relationship between human rights and economic development can also be found in a subdivision of human rights. The adoption of the ‘grey relation analysis’ in this paper proposes to assay three qualitative and quantitative variables-economic development, human rights, and the ways in which the government treats leprosy patients in Taiwan-that have been described by narrative. The findings display a significant relation between the ways in which the government deals with the issues of leprosy and human rights. Nevertheless, there is a strong connection between the evolution of leprosy patients and economic development, according to the grey relation analysis.
期刊論文
1.Worboys, Michael(2001)。The Colonial World as Mission and Mandate: Leprosy and Empire, 1900-1940。Osiris，15，207-218。  new window
2.Burkhart, Ross E(2000)。Economic Freedom and Democracy: Post-Cold War Tests。European Journal of Political Research，37，237-253。  new window
3.裴晉國(1996)。台灣地區後工業轉型之醫療保健政策，上。立法院院聞，283，72-84。  延伸查詢new window
4.裴晉國(1999)。台灣地區後工業轉型之醫療保健政策，下。立法院院聞，284，65-78。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝楠光(1999)。中華民國臺灣與國際癩病防治史。臺灣醫界，47(2)，39-42。  延伸查詢new window
6.Ahmad, Khabir(2003)。WHO Initiates Global Leprosy Health-Care Alliance。The Lancet，354( 9192)，1802-1802。  new window
7.Ahnen, Ron(2003)。Between Tyranny of the Majority and Liberty: The Persistence of Human Rights Violations under Democracy in Brazil。Bulletin of Latin American Research，22(3)，319-339。  new window
8.Blume, Lorenz、Voigt, Stefan(2007)。The Economic Effects of Human Rights。KYKLOS，60(4)，509-538。  new window
9.Chen, Ho-Shien、Tasi, Pi-Jen、Chen, Shyn-Huang、Su, Yu-Ming、Chung, Chao-Chin、Huang, Tzou-Chi(2005)。Grey Relational Analysis of Dried Roselle。Journal of Food Processing and Preservation，29(3/ 4)，228-245。  new window
10.Dols, Michael W.(1983)。The Leper in Medieval Islamic Society。Speculum，58(4)，891-916。  new window
11.Douglas, Mary(1991)。Witchcraft and Leprosy: Two Strategies of Exclusion。Man, New Series，26(4)，723-736。  new window
12.Fairchild, Amy L.(2006)。Leprosy, Domesticity, and Patient Protest: The Social Context of a Patients' Rights Movement in Mid-Century America。Journal of Social History，39(4)，1011-1254。  new window
13.Gokhale, S. D.(1996)。Superstition and Prejudice。World Health，49(3)，10-10。  new window
14.Hofferbert, Richard I.、Klingemann, Hans-Dieter(1999)。Remembering the Bad Old Days: Human Rights, Economic Conditions, and Democratic Performance in Transitional Regimes。European Journal of Political Research，36(2)，155-174。  new window
15.Hsiao, Shih-Wen、Tsai, Hung-Cheng(2004)。Use of Gray System Theory in Product-Color Planning。Color Research and Application，29(3)，222-231。  new window
16.Keith, L. C.(1999)。The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behaviour?。Journal of Peace Research，36(1)，95-118。  new window
17.Kumar, Sanjay(1999)。India Falls Short of World Health Organisation Leprosy Target。The Lancet，353(9153)，652-652。  new window
18.Lechat, Michel F.(1996)。History of a Disease。World Health，49(3)，8-10。  new window
19.McCurry, Justin(2004)。Japanese Leprosy Patients Continue to Fight Social Stigma。The Lancet，363(9408)，544-544。  new window
20.Redden, Candace Johnson(2002)。Health Care as Citizenship Development: Examining Social Rights and Entitlement。Canadian Journal of Political Science，35(1)，103-125。  new window
21.Richards, David L.、Gelleny, Ronald D.、Sacko, David H.(2001)。Money with a Mean Streak?: Foreign Economic Penetration and Government Respect for Human Rights in Developing Countries。International Studies Quarterly，45(2)，219-239。  new window
22.Watts, Jonathan(1998)。Japanese Victims of Discrimination against Lepers Sue Government。The Lancet，352(9128)，631-631。  new window
23.(1994)。WHO in Action: Eliminating Leprosy。World Health，47(2)，30-31。  new window
24.Wu, Jiann-Roung、Ming, Quhyoung(1994)。Reducing the Latency in Head-Mounted Displays by a Novel Prediction Method Using Grey System Theory。Eurographics，13(3)，503-512。  new window
25.Yamin, Alicia Ely、Rosenthal, Eric(2005)。Out of the Shadows: Using Human Rights Approaches to Secure Dignity and Well-Being for People with Mental Disabilities。PLOS Medicine，2(4)，296-298。  new window
26.Zhou, Qiang、Wang, Shengwei、Xu, Xinhua、Xiao, Fu(2008)。A Grey-box Model of Next-day Building Thermal Load Prediction for Energy-Efficient Control。International Journal of Energy Research，32(15)，1418-1431。  new window
圖書
1.總統府人權諮詢委員會(2006)。人權立國。台北市：總統府。  延伸查詢new window
2.江東亮(1999)。醫療保健政策：臺灣經驗。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。London：Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd.。  new window
4.張佛泉(1995)。自由與人權。臺北：臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉文彬(20050000)。西洋人權史：從英國大憲章到聯合國科索沃決議案。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.翁慶昌、陳嘉欉、賴宏仁(2001)。灰色系統基本方法及其應用。高立。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄧聚龍(2003)。灰色系統：理論與應用。高立圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳凱勳(2003)。我國現行健康保險制度。健康保險。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(2002)。2001年臺灣人權報告。2001年臺灣人權報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(2003)。2002年臺灣人權報告。2002年臺灣人權報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.(2004)。臺灣史。臺灣史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.溫坤禮、張偉哲、張廷政(2003)。灰關連模型方法與應用。灰關連模型方法與應用。  延伸查詢new window
13.(2005)。三屆監察院人權保障工作彙總報告。三屆監察院人權保障工作彙總報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Freemen, Michael(2005)。Human Rights。Human Rights。Cambridge。  new window
15.Muzaffar, Chandra(1999)。From Human Rights to Human Dignity。Debating Human Rights。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.中華民國統計資訊網(2009)。統計表：國民所得統計常用資料。  延伸查詢new window
2.Freedom House(2009)。Methodology。  new window
3.Freedom House(2009)。Freedom in the World Frequently Asked Questions。  new window
4.Freedom House(2009)。Country Report: Taiwan。  new window
5.Pattajoshi, Lalit，Krishnaswamy, Chetan(2009)。Graham Staines Story。  new window
6.World Health Organization(2008)。Global Strategy for Further Reducing and Sustaining Leprosy Control Activities: 2006-2010。  new window
圖書論文
1.葉金川(1993)。我國健康照護體系。健康保險。台北：巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1118（臺灣：1116，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67527518
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上