:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:概念設計階段評選衛浴產品之研究
書刊名:臺北科技大學學報
作者:陳文亮 引用關係江雅媚 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Wen-liangChiang, Ya-mei
出版日期:2010
卷期:43:1
頁次:頁73-88
主題關鍵詞:衛浴設備概念設計模糊綜合評價法Sanitary equipmentConceptual designFuzzy synthetic evaluation method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:111
在產品概念設計階段,設計師透過草圖的繪製將想法由抽象轉為具象,使得產品概念發展是新產品開發過程中,直接影響未來新產品上市成功與否的要件。然而新產品的開發過程充斥著不確定性與風險性,如何有效的設計評估是重要關鍵。因此,本研究應用模糊綜合評價法進行產品設計方案的擇優評估,並以衛浴設備產品設計為案例,說明及驗證此模式之適切性。研究顯示,此評估方法除了兼具實用性與客觀性外,亦可協助決策者在複雜及不確定的環境下進行決策,同時提供產業界可遵循的新產品開發機制。如此更能增加產品開發成功之機會,降低產品上市之風險。
In the product conceptual design stage, the designers through the draft will be the idea from abstract to concrete. The product concept development stage is critical to the success of the product it precedes the design stage and launch of the actual product development process. However, the process is risky and uncertain. Efficient design evaluation is crucial to avoiding the risk of new product development. In this paper, we construct a fuzzy synthetic evaluation method for selecting an optimum design from various design alternatives is proposed. A sanitary equipment product design is presented in this study to understand the characteristics of the proposed method. The result shows that the evaluation methods of practicality and objectivity, it is also can help decision makers, promote the decision quality and provide the industry with a set of new product development mechanism to follow. In doing so, the chance for success in the new product development can be increased and the market risk for it lowered.
期刊論文
1.Nagl, M.、Westfechtel, B.、Schneider, R.(2003)。Tool support for the management of design processes in chemical engineering。Computers and Chemical Engineering,27(2),175-197。  new window
2.陳振東、胡國瑞、戴偉勝(2001)。模糊決策方法於網路商店經營績效評估之研究。資訊管理展望,3(2),19-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.王天津、劉素苓(20040900)。應用模糊多準則決策於入口網站服務績效之研究。電子商務研究,2(3),235-257。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃國平、林振國、許慶祥(20050900)。模糊層級都市路外停車場評選方法研究。運輸學刊,17(3),281-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳文亮、陳姿樺(20080900)。模糊決策模式在職校技藝競賽選手評選之研究--以服裝製作組為例。設計學報,13(3),23-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.曾懷恩、李榮貴(19980600)。以AHP模式作為評估設計案的決策方法。設計學報,3(1),43-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Kuo, Y. F.、Chen, P. C.(2006)。Selection of mobile value: added services for system operators using fuzzy synthetic evaluation。Expert Systems with Applications,30(4),612-620。  new window
8.李孟訓、劉冠男、丁神梅、林俞君(20070300)。我國生物科技產業關鍵成功因素之研究。東吳經濟商學學報,56,27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bellman, R. E.、Zadeh, L. A.(1970)。Decision-making in a fuzzy environment。Management Science,17(4),B141-B164。  new window
10.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
11.Hsiao, S. W.(2002)。Concurrent design method for developing a new product。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,29(1),41-55。  new window
12.陳文亮、陳姿樺(20070600)。應用AHP法進行服飾陳列展示評價模式之研究--以布料摺飾設計為例。餐旅暨家政學刊,4(2),205-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳坤城、袁建中、曾國雄(2004)。企業資訊科技設備系統引進策略之模糊多評準決策。資訊、科技與社會學報,4(2),1-27。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉莉貞(2003)。技職教育指標多準則評估體系之建構與應用(博士論文)。銘傳大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.簡昭全、馮明、朱崇賢(2004)。工業設計方法論。北京:北京理工大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.闕頌廉(2001)。應用模糊數學。臺北:科技圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳萬益、林清河(2001)。企業研究方法。臺北:華泰圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Zimmermann, H. J.(1991)。Fuzzy set theory and its applications。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
5.Dubois, D.、Prade, H.(1980)。Fuzzy Sets and System: Theory and Application。New York:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE