:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:英國與武漢國民政府之漢案交涉--以英國領事報告為中心
書刊名:東吳歷史學報
作者:何萍
作者(外文):Ho, Ping
出版日期:2011
卷期:25
頁次:頁187-252
主題關鍵詞:北伐漢口慘案漢案租界群眾運動陳友仁武漢國民政府藍普生歐馬利台克滿鮑羅廷李立三廢除不平等條約修約Northern ExpeditionHankow IncidentBritish ConcessionLegitimacyMass movementWuhan RegimeEugene ChenWuhan Nationalist GovernmentYu-jen ChenMiles LampsonOwen O'MalleyEric TeichmanMikhail BorodinLi-shan LiTreaty revision
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:217
北伐期間(1926-27),南方國民政府轄區內,因激進的民族主義和群眾運動而發生數起慘案,1926年初的武漢慘案即爲一例。這些騷動迫使英國對華改採修和與妥協的態度。國內的經濟與社會騷動,以及殖民地要求自治的強大聲浪,亦迫使英國對外改採退縮政策(retrenchment)。在此背景下,英國重新修訂對華政策:不再獨尊北洋政府,並展開與南方政府的接觸和談判,以藉機試探、瞭解南方政府的內部狀況,並與之解決租界的問題。漢口慘案之協商即在此一目的下進行。另一方面,南方之武漢政府爲取得國際承認、達成修約問題以取得國內的正統與合法性,亦欲與英國展開協商。漢口慘案的善後談判適足以提供中英協商之管道。因此,在漢案談判中,雙方談漢案者少,互相試探與瞭解者多。其間,雖然武漢代表陳友仁一再希望將談判方向引至一般性之修約與承認問題,卻遭英方拒絕。此外,影響中英漢案談判之另一因素則來自蘇聯在國民黨之顧問鮑羅廷(Mikhail Borodin)。他服務於蘇聯利益,爲防止中英修好以及英國在華勢力的增加,遂一再破壞、阻撓談判,致使武漢政府態度反覆。終迫使英國決定放棄漢口租界與武漢政府。最後,武漢政府雖然收回租界,卻無法達到預期目標。
During the period of the Northern Expedition (1926-27), there emerged the Hankow Incident in the Yangtze Valley as results of Chinese nationalism and mass movements. Several Chinese were killed in the British Concession at Hankow. This incident pushed the British government to contact and negotiate with Wuhan Nationalist Government, the extreme faction of the Kuomintang and Nationalist Government.After the World War I, with so many economic, social and colonial troubles, the British government had to take a "retrenchment" foreign policy. As a consequence, Britain changed former attitude to conciliation and compromised one. Britain also gave up the policy of "one China one Government (Peiking Government)." She wanted to open door of contact with any strong as well as stable governments. The British Foreign Office decided to take the chance of negotiations over Hankow Incident to test and understand the Wuhan Nationalist Government, which she did not have diplomatic relations as well as sufficient knowledge.As to the side of Wuhan Government, it demanded to gain a diplomatic recognition from Britain, and to accomplish treaty revision with Britain, so as to enhance its legitimate position within the power struggle in China. As Britain did, Wuhan Government decided to take the chance of negotiations over Hankow Incident to attain its political aims. Nevertheless, it failed to win recognition from Britain.What caused the failure of the Wuhan Government is due to obstacles from Mikhail Borodin, an agent form Commitern. Serving for the Soveit interests, Borodin did not want to see the conciliation relationship between China and Britain. Borodin's obstruction caused Chinese attitude inconsistent. As a result, Britain decided to abandon Wuhan Government, even though she agreed to give up British Concession at Hankow.
期刊論文
1.呂芳上(19970600)。北伐時期英國增兵上海與對華外交的演變。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,27,185-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.唐啟華(19940500)。北京政府與國民政府對外交涉的互動關係, 1925-1928。興大歷史學報,4,77-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.唐啟華(19930400)。英國與北伐時期的南北和議(1926-1928)。興大歷史學報,3,129-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.唐啟華(19980600)。1919年北京政府「修約外交」的形成與展開。興大歷史學報,8,167-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.唐啟華(19980600)。民國初年北京政府「修約外交」之萌芽,1912-1918。文史學報.中興大學,28,117-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.唐啟華(19920300)。Britain and Warlordism in China: Relations With Chang Tso-lin, 1926-1928。興大歷史學報,2,207-230。new window  new window
7.閻沁恆、蔣永敬(19870500)。北伐時期的對外交涉。國立政治大學歷史學報,5,97-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳湘芬(1995)。北伐時期國民政府外交政策與對外關係。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(1972)。東方雜誌。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fung, Edmund S. K.(1991)。The Diplomacy of Imperial Retreat: Britain's South China Policy, 1924-1931。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Borg, Dorothy(1968)。American Policy and the Chinese Revolution, 1925-1928。New York:Octagon Books Inc.。  new window
4.蔣永敬(1972)。鮑羅廷與武漢政權。臺北:傳紀文學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳治世、陳長文、俞寬賜、王人傑、丘宏達(1986)。現代國際法。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.李雲漢(198708)。從容共到清黨。台北:李雲漢。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳永發(1998)。中國共產革命七十年:從革命奪權到告別革命。台北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
8.李恩涵(19930000)。北伐前後的「革命外交」:1925-1931。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.李仕德(1999)。英國與中國的外交關係。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.沈雲龍、謝文孫(1993)。傅秉常先生訪問錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.傅啓學(1983)。中國外交史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.湖北省社會科學院歷史硏究所(1982)。漢口九江收回英租界資料選編。湖北。  延伸查詢new window
13.蔣永敬(1981)。北伐時期的政治史料。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪培鈞(1968)。國民政府外交史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉彥(1979)。中國外交史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.錢亦石(1992)。中國外交史。上海。  延伸查詢new window
17.Boyce, Robert W. D.(1987)。British Capitalism at the Crossroads, 1919-1932: A Study in Politics, Economics and International Relations。Cambridge。  new window
18.Degras, Jane(1971)。The Communist International, 1919-1943, Documents。London。  new window
19.Chesneaux, Jean、Wright, H. M.(1968)。The Chinese Labour Movement, 1919-1927。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
20.王正廷(2001)。國民政府近三年來外交經過紀要,民國十五年至十八年。近代中國史料叢刊三編. 第21輯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.李恩涵(1986)。北伐前後收回關税自主權的交涉。中國近代現代史論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.劉彥(1930)。最近三十年中國外交史。近代中國史料叢刊. 第16輯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.李恩涵(2004)。陳友仁與二○年代的「革命外交」。近代中國外交史事新硏。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黨史會。革命文獻,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1980)。漢口民國日報,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.駐英使館檔案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE