臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：批判性思考課程：直接講授法與議題探究法的比較
書刊名：教育學報
作者：顧伊麗／何德芳／侯傑泰
作者(外文)：Ku, Kelly Y. L.／Ho, Irene T.／Hau, Kit-tai
出版日期：2010
卷期：38:1
頁次：頁61-69
主題關鍵詞：批判性思考；教學法；直接講授法；議題探究法；Critical thinking；Teaching methods；Direct instruction；Issue inquiry
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:31
面對日益膨脹和泛濫的資訊，怎樣教導學生建立批判能力，從而懂得選取及運用資訊，這已成為教育研究中十分重要的課題。本研究透過實驗法（共401名中六學生參與），比較直接講授法與議題探究法兩者的效能。其中後者注重探索（如分析流行電影、電視節目），這正是香港新高中課程所採用的方法。本研究結果顯示，相對於控制組，兩種教學法都能提高學生的批判性思考能力。此外，研究亦顯示，老師不應低估直接講授法的好處。有系統的講解及總結，會令學生更容易掌握內容，並能將思考方法轉移及應用於新的情境中。
Students are faced with an ever-increasing amount of information everyday. Teaching them how to select and utilize the information so obtained is therefore of paramount importance. In this research with 401 Secondary 6 (Grade 12) students, we compared the effectiveness of the direct instruction and issue inquiry methods. The latter can be conducted through the analyses of popular films and TV programs and is the approach adopted by the Hong Kong new senior secondary school curriculum. Results showed that, as compared to the control group, both approaches were able to enhance students’ critical thinking competence. Furthermore, the research also indicated that teachers should not underestimate the benefits of direct instruction. Under systematic instruction and with good summaries, students can grasp the main content and transfer the skills to new situations easily.
期刊論文
1.Alexander, M. S.(19990806)。The art of teaching students to think critically。The Chronicle of Higher Education，9。  new window
2.Black, S.(2005)。Teaching students to think critically。The Education Digest，70(6)，42-47。  new window
3.Cheung, C. K.、Rudowicz, E.、Kwan, A. S. F.、Yue, X. D.(2002)。Assessing university students’ general and specific critical thinking。College Student Journal，36(4)，504-525。  new window
4.Gong, R.(2005)。The essence of critical thinking。Journal of Developmental Education，28(3)，40。  new window
5.Hudgins, B. B.、Edelman, S.(2001)。Children’s self-directed critical thinking。Journal of Educational Research，81(5)，262-273。  new window
6.Ip, W. Y.、Lee, D. T. F.、Chau, J. P. C.、Wootton, Y. S. Y.、Chang, A. M.(2000)。Disposition towards critical thinking: A study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students。Journal of Advanced Nursing，32(1)，84-90。  new window
7.Krebs, S. H.(1996)。The Chinese cult of examinations。Clearing House，69(5)，301-302。  new window
8.McBride, R. E.、Xiang, P.、Wittenburg, D.、Shen, J.(2002)。An analysis of preservice teachers’ dispositions toward critical thinking: A cross-cultural perspective。Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education，30(2)，131-140。  new window
9.Moore, T.(2004)。The critical thinking debate: How general are general thinking skills?。Higher Education Research and Development，23(1)，3-18。  new window
10.Sá, W. C.、West, R. F.、Stanovich, K. E.(1999)。The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill。Journal of Educational Psychology，91(3)，497-510。  new window
11.Tiwari, A.、Avery, A.、Lai, P.(2003)。Critical thinking disposition of Hong Kong Chinese and Australian nursing students。Journal of Advanced Nursing，44(3)，298-307。  new window
12.Toplak, M. E.、Stanovich, K. E.(2002)。The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill。Journal of Educational Psychology，94(1)，197-209。  new window
13.Yang, S. C.、Lin, W. C.(2004)。The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan high school students。Journal of Instructional Psychology，31(1)，33-45。  new window
14.Pithers, R. T.、Soden, R.(2000)。Critical thinking in education: A review。Educational Research，42(3)，237-249。  new window
15.Kuhn, D.(1999)。A developmental model of critical thinking。Educational Researcher，28(2)，16-25。  new window
16.Halpern, D. F.(1998)。Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring。American Psychologist，53 (4)，449-455。  new window
17.Kirschner, P. A.、Sweller, J.、Clark, R. E.(2006)。Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work : An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching。Educational Psychologist，41(2)，75-86。  new window
會議論文
1.Hau, K. T.、Halpern, D.、Marin-Burkhart, L.、Ho, I. T.、Ku, K. Y. L.、Chan, N. M.、Lun, V. M. C.(200604)。Chinese and United States students’ critical thinking: Cross-cultural construct validation of a critical thinking assessment。the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco, U.S.。  new window
研究報告
1.Facione, P. A.(1990)。Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction。Millbrae, CA：California Academic。  new window
圖書
1.Biggs, J. B.(1996)。Approaches to learning of Asian students: A multiple paradox。Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE。  new window
2.Education and Manpower Bureau(2005)。The new academic structure for senior secondary education and higher education: Action plan for investing in the future of Hong Kong。Hong Kong：Education and Manpower Bureau。  new window
3.Halpern, D. F.(2003)。Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
4.Ku, K.、Hau, K. T.、Ho, I. T.(2009)。Package on “The learning & teaching of critical thinking skills” (Senior secondary)。Hong Kong：Curriculum Development Institute, Education Bureau。  new window
5.Watson, G. B.、Glaser, E. M.(1994)。Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal Form S manual。San Antonio, TX：Harcourt Brace。  new window
6.Association of American Colleges and Universities(2002)。Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college。Washington, DC：Association of American Colleges and Universities。  new window
單篇論文
1.Halpern, D. F.(2005)。Halpern critical thinking assessment: Background and scoring standards，Claremont, CA, U.S.：Claremont McKenna College。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：677（臺灣：664，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67157547
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上