:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:組織因素與個人因素對安全績效的交互作用:以TFT-LCD製造業為例
書刊名:弘光學報
作者:吳聰智 引用關係陳吉祥方聖文王建鵬陳建村
作者(外文):Wu, Tsung-chihChen, Chi-hsianFang, Sheng-wenWang, Chien-pengChen, Chien-tsun
出版日期:2011
卷期:64
頁次:頁138-153
主題關鍵詞:組織因素個人因素安全績效Organizational factorsIndividual factorsSafety performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:47
本研究目的旨在探討「組織因素」與「個人因素」對安全績效的影響。為達成研究目的,研究人員採取調查研究法進行研究。研究對象為台灣中部某TFT-LCD製造業中四個部門的主管及工程師,共560人,經立意抽樣抽取360受試者,並發給每一位受試者一份問卷及紀念品,受試者經研究人員催覆後,共獲得有效問卷168份(有效回收率為57.22%)。資料經整理後,研究人員以SPSS12.0統計軟體進行二因子多變量變異數分析(two-way MANOVA),其結果顯示,有3項交互作用達顯著水準:所屬單位分別與工作年資、職稱及事故經驗具有交互作用。因此,不同的「個人因素」對安全績效的知覺是否不同,必須視「組織因素」而定。研究者建議,組織欲追求卓越的安全績效,可藉由透過同時考量各種內外在因素,以達成組織目標。
This study explores the interaction effects of organizational factors and individual factors on safety performance. The researcher employed a questionnaire survey to attain this objective. The population was 560 managers and engineers in a TFT-LCD manufacturing industry in central Taiwan. A purposive sampling was used to select 360 subjects. The usable sample size was 168, yielding response rates of 57.22%. The researchers used a two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to analyze the data. The researchers found that there are significant interaction effects on safety performance between 1) units and seniority; 2) units and title; 3) units and accident experience. As such, whether or not individual perception of safety performance differs must be determined by the organizational factors. It is suggested that organizations like consider the internal and external factors simultaneously, and then will complete the organizational objective.
期刊論文
1.郭昭吟、吳忠信(20041000)。有害毒性化學物質緊急應變管理認知之調查研究--以雲林縣為例。工業安全衛生月刊,184,8-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.McCon, P. E.(1997)。Housekeeping and injury rate: A correlation study。Professional Safety,42(12),29-32。  new window
3.吳聰智、鍾瑞國(20021100)。安全績效量表發展--以大學院校實驗室等場所為例。弘光學報,40,53-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王啟溫(2002)。安全氣候與安全績效之相關研究--以中華電信中區分公司為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院經濟部工業局(2004)。公共安全管理白皮書科技廠房安全管理(草案)。台北:行政院經濟部工業局。  延伸查詢new window
2.余民寧(1999)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Health & Safety Executive(1992)。Successful health and safety management: Health and safety series booklet HS (G) 65。London:HMSO。  new window
4.Herzog, T. R.、朱柔若(2002)。社會科學研究方法與資料分析。臺北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.British Standard Institution(1999)。Occupational health and safety management systems: Specification。London:BSI。  new window
6.Fowler, F. J. Jr.(1993)。Survey Research Methods。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
7.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.吳明隆(2004)。SPSS統計應用實務。文魁資訊股份有限公司:松崗出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳聰智(2005)。大學院校實驗室安全績效之知覺調查。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳聰智(2003)。大學院校勞工安全衛生人員對實驗室安全績效的知覺調查。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳聰智、陳吉祥、李謹仲、柯宥任(2006)。TFT-LCD製造業安全績效量表之效度與信度。  延伸查詢new window
4.張維巖(2004)。我國大型液晶顯示器廠商之競爭策略究。  延伸查詢new window
5.魏上翔(2008)。落實安全績效管理之探討。  延伸查詢new window
6.British Standard Institution(1999b)。Occupational health and safety management systems: Guidance。  new window
7.Garavan, T. N., & O'Brien, F(2001)。An investigation into the relationship between safety climate and safety behaviours in Irish organizations。  new window
8.Getzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G.(1957)。School Review 65。  new window
9.Hoyos, C. G.(1995)。Occupational safety: Progress in understanding the basic aspects of safe and unsafe behavior。  new window
10.Mullen, J.(2004)。Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work。  new window
11.Stricoff, R. S. Safety performance measurement(1998)。Proceedings of the ASSE Light up Safety in the New Millennium: A Behavioral Safety Symposium。  new window
12.Wu, T. C., & Kang, T. L.(2004)。A perception survey of safety performance among employees in four categories of manufacturing industries in central Taiwan。  new window
13.Wu, T. C., Su, G. W., & Chang, R. C.(2004)。Safety performance in Taiwan high speed rail contract。  new window
14.Zohar, D.(2002)。The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and priorities on minor injuries in work groups。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE