:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:錢緒山心學的生命教育:死亡經驗對其思想的反省與啟發
書刊名:本土心理學研究
作者:陳正凡
作者(外文):Chen, Cheng-fan
出版日期:2010
卷期:34
頁次:頁285-327
主題關鍵詞:生命教育死亡經驗自我自性本體緒山心學Death experienceThe EgoLife educationNouslogy by Qian Xu-shanThe Self Entity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:237
  • 點閱點閱:135
錢緒山是明朝大儒王陽明的弟子,畢生傳播心學的生命教育,心學會作為明朝最重要的社會思潮,與他對心學的領會與推廣有極重要的關係。本文採取馬賽爾(G. Marcel)存在主義的哲學來釐清論題,並採取生命史的角度,由錢緒山這一生數回面對的死亡經驗出發,來探索其生命因此獲得的反省與啟發,尤其他含冤坐牢兩年,在瀕臨死亡的過程裡實證本體,這對他後來面對生命的態度有很大的影響,他的善生與善終,都可由這個視域來闡釋。通過這個視域的闡釋,本文澄清因黃黎洲徵引羅念菴的說法,引發歷來對錢緒山思想只是在反覆循環的誤解,其實證獲得的本體感應觀,實為錢緒山思想成熟後的主張。他認為本體並不實有,只有通過感應的過程才能得知本體的存在,因此人反而不是去懸空想個本體,而是常靜坐來收攝精神,順應著因緣的發展本真活著,在世情裡保持靈敏的感應,讓生命在事上精鍊,這其實提供給世人有關領悟本體更具體的內容與辦法。
Qian Xu-shan was a disciple of the great Confucianist, Wang Yang-ming during the Ming Dynasty. Throughout his life, he educated people about nouslogy. Nouslogy was a philosophy about how to transform spirit. Nouslogy as the most important social trend of the Ming Dynasty. In this article, the author use Marcel's existentialism to examine Qian's death experiences and to explore Qian's methods of reflection and enlightenment. Marcel's I-Thou relation can explain Qian's realization about nouslogy. During his two years in prison, he experienced being on the verge of death. This experience affected his attitude towards life. The author use this perspective as a framework for interpreting Qian's life. Indigerous psychological reaserch provided accurate studies about the Ego, it is also helpful for interpreting Qian's personality.In the past years, the academic communities of the Chinese philosophy did not give a high opinion to Qian Xu-shan's thoughts. The origin of phenomenon came from Huang Li-zhou's misunderstanding. The author wants to clarify Huang Li-zhou's quotation of Luo Nian-an. Huang's misquotation has caused the misunderstanding that Qian's thoughts occurred only in repeated cycles. Actually, Qian argued that his experiences constituted empirical evidence. That is, Qian held that the Self does not exist in reality; one can only experience the Entity through perception. As a result, one should not just have a fantasy of the Entity. Instead, one should practice meditation to include the spirit and live authentically according to the development of cause. In this way one can keep perception of the world sharp and refine one's life, which is a better way of understanding the Entity.
期刊論文
1.黃囇莉、鄭琬蓉、黃光國(20080400)。邁向發聲之路:上下關係中「忍」的歷程與自我之轉化。本土心理學研究,29,3-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊世英(20080400)。智慧的意涵與歷程。本土心理學研究,29,185-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳復(2009)。〈陽明子的冥契主義〉。《陽明學刊》,4,55-99。  延伸查詢new window
4.Emmons, R. A.(2000)。Is spirituality an intelligence? Motivation, cognition, and the psychology of ultimate concern。International Journal for the Psychology of Religion,10(1),3-26。  new window
圖書
1.錢明(2007)。徐愛‧錢德洪‧董澐集。南京:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.石世明、余德慧(2006)。對臨終照顧的靈性現象考察。臨終心理與陪伴研究。臺北:心靈工坊。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王守仁(1997)。王陽明傳習錄及大學問。臺北:黎明文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.E.Craufurd、Marcel, G.(1962)。Homo Viator : Introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope。New York:Harper Torchbook。  new window
5.王震武、林文瑛、林烘煜、張郁雯、陳學志(2008)。心理學。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.關永中(2002)。愛、恨與死亡:一個現代哲學的探索。台北:台灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.余德慧(2006)。生死學十四講。台北:心靈工坊。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳震(2003)。陽明後學研究。上海:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳震、王龍溪(2007)。王畿集。南京:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳鼓應(1983)。莊子今註今譯。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.陸達誠(1992)。馬賽爾。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.錢明(2009)。浙中王學研究。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Sokolowski, Robert、李維倫(2004)。現象學十四講。臺北:心靈工坊出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.王守仁、吳光、錢明、董平、姚延福(1992)。王陽明全集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Stace, Walter Terence、楊儒賓(1998)。冥契主義與哲學。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.林月惠(20050000)。良知學的轉折:聶雙江與羅念菴思想之研究。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.黃宗羲、沈芝盈(2008)。明儒學案。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.Heidegger, M.(1971)。Poetry, Language, Thought。Harper & Row。  new window
19.余德慧、石世明、夏淑怡、張譯心、釋道興(2006)。〈臨終病床陪伴的倫理∕心性之間轉圜機制的探討〉。臨終心理與陪伴研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
20.陸洛(2009)。〈從自我心理學的研究中找回自我〉。中國人的自我:心理學的分析。重慶。  延伸查詢new window
21.楊中芳(2009)。〈回顧港台「自我」研究:反省與展望〉。中國人的自我:心理學的分析。重慶。  延伸查詢new window
22.楊中芳(2009)。〈試論中國人的「自己」:理論與研究方向〉。中國人的自我:心理學的分析。重慶。  延伸查詢new window
23.龔卓軍(2009)。〈現象學論死亡:以列維納斯為線索〉。他者哲學:回歸列維納斯。台北。  延伸查詢new window
24.G.S. Fraser, René Hague、Marcel, G.(1951)。Reflection and mystery; Faith and reality.。The mystery of being (Vol. 1; Vol. 2)。London; Chicago。  new window
25.Marcel, Gabriel、Farrer, Katharine(1951)。Being and having。Boston, Massachusetts:Beacon Press。  new window
26.Marcel, G.(1951)。Les homes contre l’humain〔Man Against Mass Society〕。Paris。  new window
27.B. Wall、Marcel, G.(1952)。Metaphysical journal (2nd.).。Chicago。  new window
28.Marcel, G.(1961)。On the ontological mystery, in the philosophy of existentialism。New York。  new window
29.Virginia、G. Ringer、Marcel, G.(1975)。Royce’s metaphysics。Connecticut。  new window
30.René Hague,、Marcel, G.(1951)。Faith and reality。The mystery of being (Vol. 2)。Chicago。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE