:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:宗教戒毒歷程中生命轉化與家人關係復和的探究
書刊名:犯罪學期刊
作者:陳碧珍
作者(外文):Tan, Peck Ting
出版日期:2011
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁1-43
主題關鍵詞:藥物成癮藥癮戒治復原宗教戒毒家庭關係Drug addictionRecoveryFamily relationshipReligious rehabilitation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:87
  • 點閱點閱:152
吸毒或許是許多濫用藥物者逃離家的因素;但吸毒之後要與家重建關係更是困難重重,回家成了一條遙不可及的路;許多人或許再也無法踏上歸途。但對戒癮成功的人而言,當他們因吸毒而啷噹入獄到戒癮成功,其內在生命如何發生轉化?家人的關係復和的歷程又是如何? 本研究以三位於福音戒毒機構戒治復原,並於五年內不再吸毒者為研究對象。研究者分別和參與者進行三至四次訪談,每次訪談時間約為一個半至兩小時。訪談資料則依據Denzin(1989)「詮釋互動論」所揭示的步驟來進行資料分析。透過不斷的閱讀與理解文本,將事件彼此之間在時間與空間中開展,形成一個脈絡化的故事。 研究結果顯示家的意義之建構不是固定不變的,而是動態的過程。吸毒前,受訪者與家人的關係是疏離的,吸毒期間因無力面對自己吸毒的問題,選擇離家或自我放棄,越吸越嚴重,生活如行屍走肉。這些藥癮戒治者的生命轉化的歷程,可分成三個階段:(一)關鍵事件激發戒毒動力:這關鍵事件都與家人及情感失落有關,在他們生命的低潮中因家人的介紹來到戒治中心。(二)福音戒毒促成靈性提升:在戒毒中心因著信仰,向上締結關係,靈性提升,生命價值觀開始發生改變而能遠離毒品。(三)與家人重建關係:因為靈性重整,對家的視框產生變化,他們用實際行動與家人重建關係。
Addiction is the cause of leaving home for most of the drug abusers. It was hard for drug abusers to reconstruct the relationships of their families. Since it was a long distance to journey home, some people cannot get along with their families during their lifetime. For those who succeeded in drug rehabilitation, what happened to the changing of their family relationships? What happened in the processes in family reunion? These are the research questions addressed in this research. There were three research participants who had recovered from drug addiction while being placed in Christianity rehabilitation centers and were clean for at least five years. The narrative data were collected during three to four interview sessions for each participant. The narrative data was analyzed according to the procedure proposed by Denzin’s (1989) “Interpretive Interactionism”. The contextualized life stories were written for the report. The result shows that the construction of the meaning of home is a progressive process, not unchangeable. The meaning of home was different during the different stages in the life time. The family relationship was separated during the period of addiction. Since they were unable to face their life problems, lives become totally hopeless and they left home. There were three steps in the processes of returning home for these drug ex-abusers as the followings: (1) The motion of drug rehabilitation was triggered by critical events related to the loss of significant others in their families, thereby they took advices of their family members to the drug rehabilitation centers. (2) The Christianity made impact on their spirituality transcendence. The value of lives was changed by connected to the Higher Power. (3) The family relationship was reconstructed. Due to the spirituality transcendence, the meaning of home was changed. Therefore they took actions to reconnect with their families, and returned home eventually.
期刊論文
1.余德慧(20021200)。追索敘說自我的主體。應用心理研究,16,214-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Henricson, C.、Roker, D.(2000)。Support for the parents of adolescents: a review。Journal of adolescence,23,763-783。  new window
3.Rotunda, R. J.、Doman, K.(2001)。Partner enabling of substance use disorders: Critical review and future directions。The American Journal of Family,29,257-270。  new window
4.Sanders, M. R.(2000)。Community-based parenting and family support interventions and the prevention of drug abuse。Addictive behaviors,25(6),929-942。  new window
5.蔡怡佳、余德慧(1996)。親子「離合」關係與離家問題。諮商輔導文粹:高師輔導所刊,1,1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Knight, D. K.、Simpson, D. D.(1996)。Influences of Family and Friends on Client Progress During Drug Abuse Treatment。Journal of Substance Abuse,8(4),417-429。  new window
7.石世明、余德慧(20010300)。對臨終照顧的靈性現象考察。中華心理衛生學刊,14(1),1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.程玲玲(19970600)。海洛因成癮者的家庭研究。中華心理衛生學刊,10(2),45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Connelly, F. M.、Clandinin, D. J.(1990)。Stories of experience and narrative inquiry。Educational Researcher,19(5),2-14。  new window
10.李思賢、吳憲璋、黃昭正、王志傑、石倩瑜(20100600)。毒品罪再犯率與保護因子研究:以基隆地區為例。犯罪學期刊,13(1),81-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Lavee, Y.、Altus, D.(2001)。Family relationships as a predictor of post-treatment durg abuse relapse: A follow-up study of drug addicts and their spouses。Contemporary Family Therapy,23(4),513-530。  new window
12.Lewis, R. T.(1989)。The Family and addictions: An Introduction。Family Relations,38,254-257。  new window
13.Miller, W. R.(1998)。Researching the spirtual dimensions of alcohol and other drug problem。Addiction,93(7),979-990。  new window
14.Mallett, S.(2004)。Understanding home: a critical review of the literature。The Editorial Board of the Sociological Review,52(1),62-89。  new window
15.Mallick, J. Watts, M.(2001)。Spirituality and drug education: a study in parent / child communication。International Journal of Children's Spirituality,6(1),67-83。  new window
16.Naifeh, S.(1995)。Archetypal foundationsl of addication and recovery。Journal of Analytical Psychology,40,133-159。  new window
17.Reed, P. G.(1992)。An emerging paradign for the investigation of spirituality in nursing。Research in Nursing & Health,15,349-357。  new window
18.Burkhardt, M.。Spirituality: An analysis of the concept。Holistic Nursing Practice,3(3),66-77。  new window
19.Soko-Katz, J.、Dunham, R.(1997)。Family structure versus parental attachment in controlling adolescent deviant behavior: A social control theory。Adolescence,32(125),199-216。  new window
20.Tisdel, E. J.(2001)。Spirituality in adult and higher education。Eric DIGEST。  new window
21.Vaugh, C.、Long, W.(1999)。Surrender to Win: How adolescent drug and alcohol users change their lifes。Adolescence,34(133),9-24。  new window
22.Warfield, R. D.、Goldstein, M. B.。Spituality: The key to recovery from alcoholism。Counseling & Values,40(3),196-206。  new window
23.Erick, J.(1993)。The role of spirituality in recovery from chemical dependency。Journal of Addictions & Offender Councelling,13(2),58-61。  new window
24.Erickson, J. Q.(1993)。On being at home。Cross Currents,43(2),235-247。  new window
25.Flynn, P. M.、Joe, G. W.、Kirk, M. B. Dwayne, S. D.、Barry, S. B.(2003)。Looking Back on Cocaine Dependence: Reasons for Recovery。American Journal on Addictions,12,398-411。  new window
會議論文
1.吳芝儀(2002)。累犯犯罪者犯罪生涯及自我觀之發展與演變。嘉義。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡佩真(1990)。『宗教戒毒』之探討--以基督教戒毒輔導為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝淑敏(1989)。吸膠青少年之社會心理探索(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.安辰赫(2003)。治療社區中成年男性藥癮者戒癮復原歷程之改變因子研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡萃玲(1997)。藥癮復元者的藥癮歷程及相關要素之分析研究--以晨曦會受訪者為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳紫凰(2003)。藥物濫用女性生命歷程發展之探討(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃家慶(2011)。以中止犯罪理論探討成年男性藥癮者持續戒癮之影響因素(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃曉芬(2006)。終止犯罪之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.許素琴(1990)。藥物濫用者之家庭結構分析:以安非他命濫用者為例。私立東吳大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.顏文娟(1993)。濫用安非他命青少年於觀護所期間家屬壓力感及調適行為探討。國防醫學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.克蕾兒•馬可斯、徐詩思(2000)。家屋,自我的一面鏡子。臺北:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Denzin, Norman K.(1989)。Interpretive Interactionism。Sage Publications。  new window
3.Samsom, R. J.、Laub, J. H.(1995)。Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life。Cambridge, MA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE