臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：插補法在檢測試題差異功能的效果
書刊名：測驗學刊
作者：鄒慧英 引用關係／江培銘
作者(外文)：Tzou, Hue-ying／Chiang, Pei-ming
出版日期：2012
卷期：59:1
頁次：頁1-32
主題關鍵詞：插補；遺失值；DIF；MH；SIBTEST；Imputation；Missing data
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:96
本研究為一模擬研究，旨在探討不同遺失比率、插補法對偵測差別試題功能（DIF）的影響，藉以了解插補法在回復資料完整性後，是否有助於DIF試題的偵測。研究中比較四種處理遺失值的方法（整筆刪除、零插補、雙向插補、多重插補），並以兩種DIF偵測程序（MH、SIBTEST）進行檢驗，在不同DIF強度及遺失比率下，檢視DIF偵測的型一誤差率與檢定力，藉以評估插補法在DIF偵測的效益。研究結果顯示，整筆刪除會降低DIF偵測之型一誤差率與檢定力，DIF強度可提高DIF偵測之型一誤差與檢定力，MH與SIBTEST的偵測結果具一致性，不同插補方法對回復DIF偵測之型一誤差與檢定力有不同效果，零插補與多重插補在中度DIF有較佳的回復性，在重度DIF則是在少量遺失比率的回復性較佳，雙向插補的表現較不穩定。
The study is intended to investigate the impact of missing data rate and imputation method on the detection of DIF. The study compares the performances of four imputation methods (listwise deletion, zero imputation, two-way imputation, and multiple imputation w/NORM) and two DIF detection methods (Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST) under three missing rates (10%, 20%, and 30%) and two DIF magnitudes (0.5 and 0.8), using Type I error and the statistical power of DIF detection as comparison criteria. Several conditions are set as follows: a sample size of 1,000 used for both the focal and reference groups; missing completely at random set for the missing data mechanism; and uniform DIF throughout the study. Findings show that the listwise deletion method results in lower Type I error rate as well as power. When the DIF magnitude is medium, Type I error and power can be boosted, or namely recovered, by imputing the missing data with zero imputation and multiple imputation. In short, each imputation method has different efficacy. Furthermore, there is no much difference between the two targeted DIF detection methods, Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST, in terms of Type I error rate and power.
期刊論文
1.Rogers, H. J.、Swaminathan, H.(1993)。A comparison of logistic regression and Mantel-Haenszel procedures for detecting differential item functioning。Applied Psychological Measurement，17，105-116。  new window
2.Dc Ayala, R. J.、Plake, B. S.、Impara, J. C.(2001)。The impact of omitted responses on the accuracy of ability estimation in item response theory。Journal of Educational Measurement，38(3)，213-234。  new window
3.Uttaro, T.、Millsap, R. E.(1994)。Factors Influencing the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure in the Detection of Differential Item Functioning。Applied Psychological Measurement，18，15-25。  new window
4.Wu, Margaret(2005)。The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys。Studies in Educational Evaluation，31(2/3)，114-128。  new window
5.Roussos, L.、Stout, W.(1996)。A multidimensionality based DIF analysis paradigm。Applied Psychological Measurement，20(4)，355-371。  new window
6.Swaminathan, H.、Rogers, H. J.(1990)。Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures。Journal of Educational Measurement，27(4)，361-370。  new window
7.Dempster, Arthur P.、Laird, Nan M.、Rubin, Donald B.(1977)。Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)，39(1)，1-38。  new window
8.Mantel, N.、Haenszel, W.(1959)。Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data from Retrospective Studies of Disease。Journal of the National Cancer Institute，22(4)，719-748。  new window
9.陳信木、林佳瑩(19970400)。調查資料之遺漏值的處置--以熱卡插補法為例。調查研究，3，75-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.劉長萱(2001)。第三十八屆中國心理學會年會主題演講：心理學研究的計量基礎。中國心理學刊，43(1)，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bernaards, C. A.、Sijtsma, K.(2000)。Influence of imputation and EM methods on factor analysis when item nonresponse in questionnaire data is nonignorable。Multivariate Behavioral Research，35，321-364。  new window
12.Brooks, S. P.(1998)。Markov chain Monte Carlo methods and its application。The Statis-tician，47，69-100。  new window
13.Lord, F. M.(1974)。Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted response。Psychometrika，39(2)，247-264。  new window
14.Robitzsch, A.、Rupp, A. A.(2009)。Impact of missing data on the detection of differential item functioning: The case of Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression analysis。Educational and Psychological Measurement，69(1)，18-34。  new window
15.Monahan, P. O.、Ankenmann, R. D.(2005)。Effect of unequal variances in proficiency distributions on type-I error of the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test for differential item functioning。Journal of Educational Measurement，42(2)，101-131。  new window
16.Peugh, J. L.、Enders, C. K.(2004)。Missing data in educational research: A review of re-porting practices and suggestions for improvement。Review of Educational Research，74(4)，525-556。  new window
17.Raju, N. S.、Drasgow, F.、Slinde, J. S.(1993)。An empirical comparison of the area methods, Lord’s chi-square test, and the Mantel-Haenszel technique for assessing differential item functioning。Educational and Psychological Measurement，53(2)，301-314。  new window
18.Whitmore, M. L.、Schumacker, R. E.(1999)。A comparison of logistic regression and analysis of variance differential item functioning detection methods。Educational and Psychological Measurement，59(6)，910-927。  new window
19.Rubin, D. B.(2006)。Conceptual, computational and inferential benefits of the missing data perspective in applied and theoretical statistical problems。Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv，90，501-513。  new window
20.Shealy, R.、Stout, W.(1993)。A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects that bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF。Psychometrika，58(2)，159-194。  new window
21.Hambleton, R. K.、Rogers, H. J.(1989)。Detecting potentially biased test items: Com-parison of IRT area and Mantel-Haenszel methods。Applied Measurement in Educa-tion，2(4)，313-334。  new window
22.Wang, W. C.、Su, Y. H.(2004)。Effect of average signed area between two item characteristic curves and test purification procedures on the DIF detection via the Mantel-Haenszel method。Applied Measurement in Education，17(2)，113-144。  new window
23.Zhang, B.、Walker, C. M.(2008)。Impact of missing data on person-model fit and person trait estimation。Applied Psychological Measurement，32(6)，466-479。  new window
24.Finch, H.(2004)。The MIMIC model as a method for detecting DIF: Comparison with Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and the IRT likelihood ratio。Applied Psychological Measurement，29(4)，278-295。  new window
25.Jodoin, M. G.、Gierl, M. J.(2001)。Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection。Applied Measurement in Education，14(4)，329-349。  new window
26.Lei, P. W.、Chen, S. Y.、Yu, L.(2006)。Comparing methods of assessing differential item functioning in a computerized adaptive testing environment。Journal of Educational Measurement，43(3)，245-264。  new window
27.Li, H. H.、Stout, W.(1996)。A new procedure for detection of crossing DIF。Psychomet-rika，61(4)，647-677。  new window
學位論文
1.林曉芳(2002)。以Hot deck插補法推估成就測驗之不完整作答反應(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林坤昌(1999)。DIF檢定方法之探討與比較。國立台中教育大學，台中市。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃瓅瑩(2008)。HGLM分析DIF之比較與應用。國立台南大學，台南市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Allison, Paul David(2002)。Missing Data。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Little, Roderick J. A.、Rubin, Donald B.(2002)。Statistical analysis with missing data。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.American Psychological Association、American Educational Research Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。  new window
4.洪碧霞、陳昌明、楊佩馨(2008)。資優學生甄選（含縮修）國語文成就測驗題庫資源擴充與管理之研究（RR97-01）。台南市。  延伸查詢new window
5.Rubin, D, B.(2004)。Multiple imputation for nonresponse in survey。New York, NY。  new window
6.Zieky, M. J.(1993)。Practical questions in the use of DIF statistcis in test development。Differential item functioning。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Schafer, J. L.(1999)。NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2，http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html， 20081230。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dorans, Neil J.、Holland, Paul W.(1993)。DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization。Differential item functioning。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D. T.、Holland, W. P.(1988)。Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：844（臺灣：839，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67386236
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上