:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以社區為基礎的農村規劃效率探討
書刊名:造園景觀學報
作者:彭立沛吳振發
作者(外文):Peng, Li-peiWu, Chen-fa
出版日期:2013
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁65-86
主題關鍵詞:社區營造農村規劃規劃效率農村再生神戶Community developmentRural planningPlanning efficiencyRural regenerationKobe
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:95
以社區為基礎的農村規劃強調採取社區自主的參與過程而往往效率不彰。然而許多政府仍持續提倡以社區為基礎的農村規劃作法,表示這種農村規劃方式是可行的,但必須改善規劃效率的問題。本研究目的在探討以社區為基礎的農村規劃效率,進一步嘗試了解農村社區變項和規劃效率之間的關係和未來的改善策略。本研究以迴歸模型分析日本神戶市150個農村社區規劃案例,結果顯示改善「產業經營面」所提升的規劃效率大於改善「環境資源面」。此外,「環境資源」面的「到達人口集中地區時間」越長,有助於縮短農村規劃花費時間;「產業經營」面的「法人組織數」越多、「事業收入規模」越大、「無兼營比例」越少、「批貨組織數」越少,有助於縮短農村規劃花費時間。由此可知以社區為基礎的農村規劃相當費時,改善農村規劃效率應先設法提升農村社區產業經營的自主能力,其次是環境資源改善。此結果可作為提升台灣農村再生規劃效率之參考。
The community-based rural planning emphasized adopting participatory processes for community autonomy but frequently resulted in poor efficiency. However, many governments still encourage the method of community-based rural planning. This represents the method is appropriate but must improves its inefficiency problem of rural planning. The purpose of this article is to examine the efficiency of community-based rural planning, and further to understand the relationships between the variables of rural communities and the planning efficiency and the improving strategies in the future. This article used regression models to analyze 150 rural communities in Kobe city in Japan. We found that to improve the planning efficiency was obviously more important to promote the "industry operation" concept than the "environmental resources" concept. For concept of "environmental resources", the results presented the significantly negative relationship between the variable of "densely inhabited district time (DID)" and the time consumption of rural planning. As for "agricultural industry operation" concept, the results showed the significantly negative relationships between the variables, i.e., "number of legal person organization" and "income size of undertaking", and the time consumption, and showed the significantly positive relationships between the variables, i.e., "no cooperation proportion" and "number of wholesale" and the time consumption. This article clarifies that the community-based rural planning is rather time-consuming and suggests that the strategy to enhance efficiency of rural planning must elaborate to improve the autonomic capacity of community-based operation rather than to be dominated by the organizations of wholesales. The results provide experiences to promote rural planning efficiency for policy of rural regeneration in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.莊谷中、郭秀裕(20090600)。法律作為實現政策的工具--農村再生條例草案的省思。土地問題研究季刊,8(2)=30,39-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃麗玲(2003)。一九九○年代臺北市都市規劃中的社區參與:全球過程、地方政治以及鄰里回應。地理學報,34,61-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭詩華(1991)。日本農業法制系列研究之五--農村規劃之理念及法制。經社法制論叢,7,77-118。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭崑杉(2011)。綠色生活圈與農村再生。農業推廣文彙,56,263-268。  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾怡婷(20111200)。農村再生條例關注行動中的象徵鬥爭。思與言,49(4),139-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Cocklin, C.、Lonergan, S.、Smit B.(1998)。Assessing Conflicts in the Use of Rural Resources: an Analytical Framework。Journal of Rural Studies,4(1),9-20。  new window
7.Hoshino, S.(2001)。Multilevel modeling on farmland distribution in Japan。Land Use Policy,18,75-90。  new window
8.Hoshino, S.(2002)。People'€™s enthusiasm toward the community planning and its prescribing factors: case study of K village in Kita-ku (North ward) of Kobe city。Transactions of Rural Planning,4,133-138。  new window
9.Hoshino, S.(2004)。Significance of behavioral science approach in participatory rural planning: analysis on influential factors of community planning。Transactions of Rural Planning,6,229-234。  new window
10.Kuki, Y.、Hoshino, S.、Hashimoto, S.、Miyake, Y.(2010)。Influence of support bodies in the planning methods and forms of rural community plans: a case study of "Satodzukuri" plans of Kobe city。Journal of Rural Planning,29,317-322。  new window
11.Kuki, Y.、Miyake, Y.、Kudo, Y.(2010)。Characteristics of the rural landscape conservation activities based on the ordinance。Journal of the JSIDRE,78(8),693-698。  new window
12.Laband, D. N.、Lentz, B. F.(1983)。Occupational Inheritance in Agriculture。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,65(2),311-314。  new window
13.Lawrence, R. L.、Deagen, D. A.(2001)。Choosing Public Participation Methods for Natural Resources: A Context-Specific Guide。Society and Natural Resources,14,857-872。  new window
14.Lobley, M.、Potter, C.(2004)。Agricultural change and restructuring: recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England。Journal of Rural Studies,20,499-510。  new window
15.Robinson, G. M.(1997)。Community-Based Planning: Canada'€™s Atlantic Coastal Action Program (ACAP)。The Geographical Journal,163(1),25-37。  new window
16.Zhang, N.、Wang, M.、Wang, N.(2002)。Precision agriculture--a worldwide overview。Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,36,113-132。  new window
17.Herbert-Cheshire L.(2000)。Contemporary strategies for rural community development in Australia: a governmentality perspective。Journal of Rural Studies,16(2),203-215。  new window
18.Murdoch, Jonathan(2000)。Networks: A New Paradigm of Rural Development?。Journal of Rural Studies,16(4),407-419。  new window
19.廖石(2003)。從「地方治理」的思潮變遷探討「社區賦權」在鄉村發展政策中的定位與課題。城市與設計學報,15/16,93-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.謝宏昌(2003)。我國參與式規劃推動概況與實踐結果之實證分析 (計畫編號:NSC91-2415-H-006-002-007)。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢學陶(1992)。農村規劃手冊--研究報告。台北:國立中興大學都市計劃研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李永展(2012)。永續國土.區域治理.社區營造:理論與實踐。台北:詹氏。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hall, P.、Tewdwr-Jones, M.(2011)。Urban and regional planning。New York。  new window
3.農村計畫學會(1993)。農村計画学の展開。東京都:農林統計協會。  延伸查詢new window
4.財團法人農林統計協會(2008)。2005年農林業センサス農業集落カード利用ガイド。東京都:農林統計協會。  延伸查詢new window
5.神戶市產業振興局農政計画課(1996)。人と自然との共生ゾーンの指定等に関する条例、人と自然との共生ゾーンの指定等に関する条例施行規則、人と自然との 共生ゾーン審讓會規則。神戸市:神戶市產業振興局農政計画課。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院農業委員會水土保持局(2011)。推動農村再生手冊。行政院農業委員會水土保持局。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉健哲(2006)。城鄉新風貌--德國之農村與規劃。臺北:詹氏書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.周文賢(2002)。多變量統計分析:SAS/STAT使用方法。智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Healey, P.(2008)。Developing neighborhood management capacity in Kobe, Japan: Interactions between civil society and formal planning institutions,http://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2009。  new window
2.Kobe city(2012)。The symbiosis zone for human and nature. Kobe city office,http://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/information/project/industry/symbiosis/index.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE