:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:2012年民事法發展回顧:民事財產法裁判回顧
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:陳聰富 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Tsung-fu
出版日期:2013
卷期:42:特刊
頁次:頁967-998
主題關鍵詞:法律行為標的不法行為代理消滅時效誠信原則繼續性契約因果關係權利侵害給付關係不法原因給付舉證責任物上請求權Objects of juridical actIllegal representativeStatute of limitationGood faithContinuing contractCausationInfringment of rightsPerformance relationshipIllegal causeBurden of proofClaim on property right
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:90
  • 點閱點閱:34
在2012年期間,最高法院作成許多在民法理論發展上具有重要性的判決。具有新穎性判決者,如當事人合意依契約書的「附件」確定標的時,若該附件於訂約時不存在,即屬法律行為標的無法確定,致法律行為無效。又如給付不能所生損害賠償請求權消滅時效的起算點,應自債務人陷於給付不能時起算,再延長15年。此外,最高法院認為,不法行為所從事的法律行為本身,仍得成立表見代理,顯然變更過去的見解。最後,最高法院在高爾夫球會員俱樂部案件,認為不定期繼續性契約關係,會員具有任意終止權,得請求返還入會之保證金,具有保護消費者權益的功能。
The Supreme Court declared many important judgments that had great impact on the legal theories of the civil law in 2012. They featured some key issues as follows.1. Newly developed doctrine: The Court holds that a contract is void where the ”attached document” indicating the distribution of properties is absent when it is entered into.2. Revision of former doctrine: The Court holds that the juridical act can be done by an agent acting without its authority even if it gets involved in a wrongful act.3. New doctrine distinct from legal theory: The Court holds that the statute of limitations for the claim on damages due to the impossibility of performance gets start to run from the time when the performance becomes impossible.4. New interpretation on the doctrine of good faith: The Court holds that it was not in violation of good faith where the plaintiff made a claim against the defendant even if 27 years had elapsed since the plaintiff made a claim last time.5. Protection of consumer's rights: The Court holds that a member of a golf club is entitled to terminate a contract at any time and to claim the recovery of his membership deposits paid since such a contract is a continuous service contract without specific duration of time.
期刊論文
1.陳聰富(20101000)。債權物權化之適用基礎--最高法院96年度臺上字第334號民事判決評釋。法令月刊,61(10),26-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許家馨(20120800)。言論自由與名譽權的探戈--我國名譽侵權法實務與理論之回顧與前瞻。政大法學評論,128,203-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.葉啟洲(20120800)。身分法益侵害之損害賠償的實務發展及其檢討。政大法學評論,128,1-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳聰富(20110600)。歐陸法嚴格責任立法與我國民法第191條之3之檢討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,40(2),569-628。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳忠五(20120701)。第三人確定契約標的與契約的有效性--最高法院100年度臺上字第2030號判決評釋。臺灣法學雜誌,203,111-119。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳聰富(20080800)。誠信原則的理論與實踐。政大法學評論,104,1-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.施啓揚(20050600)。民法總則。台北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳聰富(200409)。因果關係與損害賠償。台北:元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王澤鑑(2012)。債法原理。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
4.王澤鑑(201006)。民法物權。台北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝在全(201009)。民法物權論。台北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
6.孫森焱(200609)。民法債編總論。五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王澤鑑(2009)。不當得利。臺北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
8.王澤鑑(2010)。侵權行為法。臺北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃立(200611)。民法債編總論。臺北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃立、楊芳賢、陳洸岳、謝銘洋、吳秀明、蘇惠卿、郭惠玲(2002)。民法債編各論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
11.林誠二(2012)。民法總則新解:體系化解說。瑞興圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.邱聰智、姚志明(2002)。新訂債法各論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳聰富(2008)。人身侵害之損害概念。侵權違法性與損害賠償。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE