本研究旨在探討合作學習班與普通班在籃下一分鐘投籃與學習態度的差異情形。研究對象為本校學生，採簡單抽樣抽取筆者授課學生男54人及女42人，計96人。施以四週的籃球教學。研究工具為學習態度量表（α係數.656至.866），發出100份，無效4份，回收有效96份（96％）。以SPSS 10.0 for Windows統計軟體及統計方法考驗差異，顯著水準為p＜.05。結果如下： 一、合作學習班與普通班在籃下一分鐘投籃的差異 普通班常以個人學習成就為中心，少有小組合作觀念。合作學習班注重小組合作、交流及互助的回饋教學方式，表現顯著優於普通班。 二、合作學習班與普通班在籃下一分鐘投籃學習態度的差異 （一）在學習態度的學習方法 普通班教學在教學方法的變化差異不大，無法提供較好的學習環境。合作學習班提供多元、互動的學習方法，增強學習態度，表現顯著優於普通班。 （二）在學習態度的學習計劃 普通班的資訊由教師獲得，無學習計劃來預習及複習課程。合作學習改變學習態度，建立學習計劃，提昇學習成果，表現顯著優於普通班。

The purpose of the study was to examine the different cooperative learning and traditional learning toward to basketball skill and learning attitude. Fifty-four male students, and forty-two female students were the subjects of this study. During four weeks basketball skill class, and the instrument of the learning attitude scale (Cronbach α=.656866) was administered to subjects. The total subjects were 100 students, and 96 copies were valid (96%). The SPSS 10.0 for Windows statistical methods was used to analyze the data. The significant level was set at p<.05. The findings were as followed: A) The different between cooperative learning and traditional learning on basketball skill. The traditional learning used to be a personal learning center, and less teams-work concept. The cooperative learning used feedback teach style to be a teams-work concept, interaction, and help each other. So the cooperative learning performance was better than the traditional learning. B) The different between cooperation learning and traditional learning on learning attitude. 1. On learning method of learning attitude aspect. There can’t supply good learning environment, and no new teach method of traditional learning. There can supply multi-teach method, interaction, and reinforce learning attitude. So the cooperative learning attitude was better than the traditional learning. 2. On learning plan of learning attitude aspect. The traditional learning was no learning plans for prepare courses, and the course information gains from teacher. The cooperative learning can change learning attitude, build learning plans, and promotion learning effects. So the cooperative learning plan was better than the traditional learning.