:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體育教師休閒活動參與行為、工作生活品質與工作壓力之研究--以雲、嘉地區體育教師為例
書刊名:運動休閒管理學報
作者:侯堂盛 引用關係楊孟華 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Tang-shangYang, Meng-hua
出版日期:2014
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:體育教師背景變項休閒行為工作生活品質工作壓力TeachersBackground variablesLeisure behaviorWorking and living qualityWorking pressure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:144
  • 點閱點閱:29
本研究之目的在瞭解雲嘉地區高中職、國中和國小體育教師的休閒活動參與行為、工作生活品質與工作壓力之現況;不同背景變項在休閒活動參與行為、工作生活品質與工作壓力之差異;休閒活動參與行為、工作生活品質與工作壓力之間預測關係分析。共發放問卷400份數份問卷,有效回收問卷313份問卷,回收率為78.3%。分析結果:(一)體育教師最近一個月內以從事娛樂性休閒活動的時間最高;整體的工作生活品質平均數為3.91接近「同意」程度;整體工作壓力之平均值為3.21屬於「普通」程度。(二)性別、年齡、學校、職務等變項在休閒活動參與行為部分構面達顯著差異。(三)性別、婚姻、年齡等變項在工作生活品質部分構面達顯著差異。(四)性別、年齡、學校等變項在工作壓力部分構面達顯著差異。(五)在工作生活品質上,發現自我實現最能有效解釋知識性休閒活動;人際溝通最能有效解釋技藝性的休閒活動與休憩性的休閒活動。發現工作壓力上,家庭因素最能有效解釋體育性的休閒活動;工作負荷最能有效解釋娛樂性休閒活動。發現工作壓力上,人際關係最能有效解釋生活品質的自我實現、學習環境與氣氛、人際溝通和整體性;組織特性最能有效解釋生活品質的學習機會與健康安全。以上結果將可提供未來相關研究參考。
The purpose of this research is to understand the current stuation of Yunlin and Chiayi County school physical education teachers (elementary school, junior high school, and high school) on leisure behavior participation, working and life quality and working pressure, and to understand the difference as well as the relationship analysis among leisure participation, working and life quality and working pressure under different background variables. The subjects of this research are elementary school, middle school, and high school teachers in Yunlin and Chiayi County. There are total 400 questionnaires. The retrieved effective questionnaires are 313 copies. The effective retrieving rate is 78.3%. After statistic analyzing, the results are: (1) Elementary school teachers spend most of time on entertainment leisure activities in recent one month. The average score of working living quality is 3.91, which is close to "agreeable". The average of overall working pressure is 3.21, which is close to "average". (2) Variables, such as gender, age, school, and positions, show significant difference on the part of leisure participation. (3) Variables, such as gender, marriage, and age, show significant difference on the part of working and life quality. (4) There is significant difference on the variables such as gender, age, and school for working pressure. (5) In working and life quality, it is found that self-actualization can most effectively explain knowledge-related leisure activities participation, and interpersonal communication can best explain skill-related leisure participation and the ones meant for rest. It is also found that regarding working pressure, family factors can explain most effectively sports-related leisure participation. Work load can best explain entertainment leisure activity participation. Regarding working pressure, interpersonal relationships can best explain self-actualization, learning environment and atmosphere, interpersonal communication, and wholeness of the life quality. organization characteristics most effectively explains the learning opportunity and health safety of the life quality. The above research results can be used for future research references.
Other
1.石宜正,梁玉芳,大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.楊孟華、孫美蓮、邱思慈(20100800)。嘉義縣國中教師休閒活動參與行為與工作生活品質之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒,9(2),71-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周文祥(19961200)。壓力的調適與管理。國民體育季刊,25(4)=111,28-37+203。  延伸查詢new window
3.許志賢、黃于庭、鄭志成(20090300)。休閒活動參與對國小教師身心健康之研究--以屏東縣為例。運動休閒餐旅研究,4(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許志賢、蔡進發、黃宗成、何欣怡(20070900)。高科技產業員工休閒行為與工作生活品質、工作壓力、工作績效之相關性研究。管理實務與理論研究,1(3),153-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡熙銘(20081200)。高雄縣國小教師休閒滿意度與工作壓力關係之研究。生物與休閒事業研究,6(3),15-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陸洛、胡家欣(20021200)。Experiencing Leisure: The Case of Chinese University Students。Fu Jen Studies: Science and Engineering,36,1-21。  new window
7.陸洛、蔡貴丞、吳欣蓓(20091200)。工作壓力與休閒活動對工作後果之雙重影響。運動與遊憩研究,4(2),151-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林菁真、王淑治、甘唐沖、滕中瑋(20080900)。國立大學職員之休閒行為、工作生活品質、工作壓力與工作績效之相關性研究。運動休閒餐旅研究,3(3),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳水丕、呂佩珊(20080900)。大臺北地區國小教師工作壓力與休閒參與之關係研究。工作與休閒學刊,1(1),49-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Gauvin, L.、Rejeski, W. J.(1993)。The exercise-induced feeling inventory: Development and initial validation。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,15(4),403-423。  new window
11.McAuley, E.、Coumeya, K. S.(1994)。The Subjective Exercise Experiences Scale (SEES): Development and Preliminary Validation。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16(2),163-177。  new window
12.蔡培村(19920700)。教師休閒生活的價值與規劃。教育實習輔導通訊,3,16-24。  延伸查詢new window
13.Taylor, C. B.、Sallis, J. F.、Needle, R.(1985)。The relation of physical activity and exercise to mental health。Public Health Reports,100(2),195-202。  new window
14.陳家聲、樊景立(20000100)。我國國人工作生活品質經驗之研究。管理評論,19(1),31-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.楊孟華(20101200)。嘉義縣國小教師休閒活動參與行為、工作生活品質與工作壓力之研究。運動休閒管理學報,7(2),132-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Beard, Jacob G.、Ragheb, Mounir G.(1980)。Measuring leisure satisfaction。Journal of Leisure Research,12(1),20-33。  new window
17.陳安妮(20100600)。教師工作壓力與休閒運動參與之研究--以台南地區高中教師為例。運動休閒管理學報,7(1),138-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝政諭(19890000)。休閒活動的理論與實際:民生主義的臺灣經驗。臺北:幼獅。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kelly, J. R.(1996)。Leisure。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Berger, B. G.、McIuman, A.(1993)。Exercise and the quality of life。Handbook of research on sport psychology。New York:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE