臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：史前時代臺灣南部地區的野豬與家豬，兼論家豬作為南島語族遷徙和擴散的驗證標記
書刊名：中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊
作者：李匡悌 引用關係／李冠逸／朱有田／臧振華 引用關係
作者(外文)：Li, Kuang-ti／Li, Kuan-yi／Ju, Yu-ten／Tsang, Cheng-hwa
出版日期：2015
卷期：86:3
頁次：頁607-678
主題關鍵詞：臺灣野豬；蘭嶼豬；牙齒形態學；家豬；南島語族遷徙與擴張；Formosan wild boar；Lanyu pig；Dental morphology；Domestic pig；Austronesian speaking people migration and dispersal
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:106
動物飼養的概念和經濟行為是人類跨入文明的指標。考古學家認為為由考古遺址中出土的動物遺存能夠認識和了解當時人類選擇獵取動物的對象和依賴動物資源的程度。本論文試團結由臺灣地區考古遺址出土豬骨骼樣本，透過對豬下顎骨與牙齒的形態測量學，以及現生野豬和家豬粒線體DNA的遺傳分析，探討史前景落獵捕或豢養的是臺灣野豬或是家豬。除此之外，本論文將針對長久以來臺灣被視為南島語族原鄉的論述，探討家豬是否極有可能隨著族群的遷徙與擴張而分布。根據目前研究的成果顯示，透過對恆春半島和南科園區遺址出土豬牙樣本，和現生野豬與家豬之第三大臼齒大小以及形狀的比較分析，發現鵝鑾鼻第二遺址和右先方遺址樣本牙齒大小與形狀多屬體型較大的野豬，牛尿港遺址樣本牙齒大小較接近現生野豬，而形狀則介於現生野豬和家豬之間，未來尚需更多樣本以釐清豬隻種屬，龜山遺址樣本反映有出現家豬個體的可能性，社內遺址樣本牙齒大小與形狀均接近於現生家豬；準此，推斷至遲距今一千五百年前，臺灣才開始有東亞家豬經由交易或人群遷徙攜入本土境內的可能性。引起注意的是，蘭嶼豬的具體存在年代目前尚無考古材料能夠提供說明。總的來說，未來可再利用臺灣其他地區的考古出土豬骨骼遺留，進行相關臺灣野豬種原發展史，以及家豬畜養生業經濟的起始年代研究。這個成果不僅可以具體地復原史前時代臺灣野豬的種原，並探討當時的生業經濟型態，也可以做為其他地區研究史前動物資源、利用模式的參考與範例。
Formation of the concept and economic behavior of animal husbandry is one of the key indicators showing our entry into civilization. With animal remains unearthed from archaeological sites, archaeologists believe that we would be able to learn how ancient people selected their prays and how heavily they were dependent on animal resources. This study focuses on the pig bones remains unearthed from the Hengchun Peninsula and Tainan Science Park region, and their mandible and teeth are studied with dental geometric morphometric variation. In addition, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) extracted from modern Formosan wild boars and Lanyu pigs are analyzed to tell their genetic variation. The first objective of this paper, in short, is to answer whether those ancient pigs were wild boars or domestic pigs. Secondly, if the hypothesis that Taiwan is the homeland of Austronesian speaking people has been proven to be valid, then this paper intends to further discuss whether domestic pigs could possibly be a verification mark to the migration and dispersal ofthese people. Our results reveal that specimens discovered from the O-luan-pi II site and the Yuhsienfang site have larger third molars (M3) than modern wild boars, and show resernblances to wild boars. These specimens are therefore recognized as larger wild boars. M3 size of the specimens unearthed from Niuniaokang site are similar to those of rnodern wild boars, while their shapes are identified as in between those of the wild boars and dornestic pigs. This result would however need further clarification in the future. Lastly, specirnens frorn the Kueishan site yield possibile sarnples of domestic pigs, while the size and shape of teeth samples unearthed from the Shenei site are closely related to those of modem domestic pigs. To sum up, based on these aforementioned evidences, East Asian domestic pigs were introduced to Taiwan at around 1,500 BP at the latest through trade and/or human migration. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of concrete archaeological evidence to know when Lanyu pigs began to exist in Lanyu. We need more samples from other areas to make the phylogenetic tree and geometric morphometric analysis to determine the time when pig husbandry was very first started in Taiwan. In short, this study provides essential information for reconstructing the subsistence system at then and the model of prehistoric animal resources utilization in general.
期刊論文
1.臧振華(20120600)。再論南島語族的起源與擴散問題。南島研究學報，3(1)，87-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.邱敏勇(2002)。臺灣新石器時代豬的畜養和狩獵--利用牙齒標準區分家豬和野豬的研究。中央研究院歴史語言研究所集刊，73(2)，271-302。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李冠逸、吳宗育、王穎、郭俊成、龔明祥、李一泓、黃培好、朱有田、姜延年(2006)。台灣野豬類緣關條之研究。中國畜牧學會會誌，35，135。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳幸如(20131100)。臺灣野豬的現況與保育。科學發展月刊，491，12-18。  延伸查詢new window
5.袁靖(2001)。中國新石器時代家畜起源的問題。文物，2001(5)，51-58。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊天樹(1995)。臺灣養豬產黨發展歷程。中國畜牧學會會誌，24(增刊)，23-29。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊昌輝(1962)。豬骨酪學上之比較研究--第三報齒之測定及比較。國立臺灣大學農學院研究報告，6(3)，51-59。  延伸查詢new window
8.蕭旭峰、吳文哲(19980800)。生物形狀的科學--淺談幾何形態測量學之發展與應用。科學月刊，29(8)=344，624-633。  延伸查詢new window
9.羅運兵、張居中(2008)。河南舞陽縣賈湖遺址出土豬骨的再研究。考古，1，90-96。  延伸查詢new window
10.金子壽衛男(1978)。台灣に於ける貝塚の分布と其の構成貝類について。大阪府立市岡高等學校紀要，2，1-41。  延伸查詢new window
11.宮本延人(1931)。台灣の先史時代遺跡の概要。史學，10(4)，689-694。  延伸查詢new window
12.Amano, N.、Piper, P.、Hung, H.、Bellwood, P.(2013)。Introduced Domestic Animals in the Neolithic and Metal Age of the Philippines: Evidence From Nagsabaran, Northern Luzon。The Journal of lsland and Coastal Archaeology，8，317-335。  new window
13.Anezaki, T.、Yamazaki, K.、Hongo, H.、Sugawara, H.(2008)。Chronospatial variation of dental of Holocene Japanese wild pigs (Sus scrofa leucomystax)。The Quaternary Research，47，29-38。  new window
14.Avise, J. C.、Lansman, R. A.、Shade, R. O.(1979)。The use of restriction endonucleases to measure mitochondrial DNA sequence relatedness in natural populations. I. Population structure and evolution in the genus Peromyscus。Genetics，92，279-295。  new window
15.Brown, W. M.、George, M. Jr.、Wilson, A. C.(1979)。Rapid evolution of animal mitochondria1 DNA。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，76，1967-1971。  new window
16.Cann, R. L.、Brown, W. M.、Wilson, A. C.(1984)。Polymorphic sites and the mechanism of evolution in human mitochondria1 DNA。Genetics，106，479-499。  new window
17.Cucchi, T.、Hulme-Beaman, A.、Yuan, J.、Dobney, K.(2011)。Early Neolithic pig domestication at Jiahu, Henan Province, China: clues from molar shape analyses using geometric morphometric approaches。Journal of Archaeological Science，38，11-22。  new window
18.遠藤秀紀、林良博、山崎京美、本川雅治、裴家騏、林良恭、周政翰、押田龍夫(20021000)。Geographical Variation of Mandible Size and Shape in the Wild Pig (Susscrofa) from Taiwan and Japan。Zoological Studies，41(4)，452-460。  延伸查詢new window
19.Ervynck, A.、Dobney, K.、Hongo, H.、Meadow, R. H.(2001)。Born Free? New Evidence for the Status of Sus scrofa at Neolithic Çayönü Tepesi (Southeastem Anatolia, Turkey)。Paleorient，27(2)，47-73。  new window
20.Groves, C. P.(1981)。Ancestors for the Pigs: Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Genus Sus。Technical Bulletin，3。  new window
21.Helmer, D.(1988)。Les animaux de Cafer et des sites precermaiques due Sud-Est de la Turquie: Essai de Synthese。Anatonica，15，37-48。  new window
22.Hongo, H.、Ishiguro, N.、Watanobe, T.、Shigehara, N.、Anezaki, T.、Long, V. T.、Binh, D. V.、Tien, N. T.、Nam, N. H.(2002)。Variation in mitochondrial DNA of Vietnamese pigs: relationships with Asian domestic pigs and Ryukyu wild boars。Zoological Science，19，1329-1335。  new window
23.Hongo, H.、Meadow, R. H.(2004)。Anima1 Exp1oitation at Çayönü Tepesi, Southeastem Anato1ia, in Featuring Complex Societies in Prehistory: Studies in Memoriam of the Braidwoods。Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology，7，107-119。  new window
24.Jiang, Y. N.、Wu, C. Y.、Huang, C. Y.、Huang, C. Y.、Chu, H. P.、Ke, M. W.、Kung, M. S.、Li, K. Y.、Wang, C. H.、Li, S. H.、Wang, Y.、Ju, Y. T.(2008)。Interpopu1ation and intrapopu1ation matemal lineage genetics of Lanyu pig (Sus scrofa) by analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome b and control region sequences。Journal of Animal Science，86，2461-2470。  new window
25.Kalmár, T.、Bachrati, C. Z.、Marcsik, A.、Raskó, I.(2000)。A simple and efficient method for PCR amplifiable DNA extraction from ancient bones。Nucleic Acids Research，28，67。  new window
26.Kuroda, N.(1935)。Formosan mammals preserved in the collection of Marquis Yamashina。Journal of Mammalogy，16(4)，277-291。  new window
27.Larson, G.、Dobney, K.、Albarella, U.、Fang, M.、Smith, E. M.、Robins, J.、Lowden, S.、Finlayson, H.、Willerslev, E.、Brand, T.、Conwy, P. R.、Andersson, L.、Cooper, A.(2005)。Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication。Science，307，1618-1621。  new window
28.Matschke, G. H.(1967)。Aging European wild hogs by dentition。The Journal of Wildlife Management，31，109-113。  new window
29.Morii, Y.、Ishiguro, N.、Watanobe, T.、Nakano, M.、Hongo, H.、Matsui, A.、Nishimoto, T.(2002)。Ancient DNA reveals genetic lineage of Sus scrofa among archaeological sites in Japan。Anthropological Science，110，3-3。  new window
30.Peters, J.、Helmer, D.、von den Driesch, A.、Saña Segui, M.(1999)。Early animal husbandry in the northern Levant。Paleorient，25(2)，27-47。  new window
31.Piper, P.、Hung, H. C.、Campos, F. Z.、Bellwood, P.、Santiago, R.(2009)。A 4000 year-old introduction of domestic pigs into the Philippine Archipelago: implications for understanding routes of human migration through Island Southeast Asia and Wallacea。Antiquity，83，687-695。  new window
32.Watanobe, T.、Ishiguro, N.、Nakano, M.、Takamiya H.、Matsui, A.、Hongo, H.(2002)。Prehistoric introduction of domestic pigs onto the Okinawa Island: ancient mitochondrial DNA Evidence。Journal of Molecular Evolution，55，222-231。  new window
33.Watanobe, T.、Okumura, N.、Ishiguro, N.、Nakano, M.、Matsui, A.、Sahara, M.、Komatsu, M.(1999)。Genetic relationship and distribution of the Japanese wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) and Ryukyu wild boar (Sus scrofa riukiuanus) analyzed by mitochondrial DNA。Molecular Ecology，8，1509-1512。  new window
34.Wolstenholme, D. R.(1992)。Animal mitochondrial DNA: structure and evolution。lnternational Review of Cytology，141，173-215。  new window
35.Wu, C. Y.、Jiang, Y. N.、Chu, H. P.、Li, S. H.、Wang, Y.、Li, Y. H.、Chang, Y.、Ju, Y. T.(2007)。The type I Lanyu pig has a maternal genetic lineage distinct from Asian and European pigs。Animal Genetics，38，499-505。  new window
36.宋文薰、黃士強、連照美、李光周(19670600)。鵝鑾鼻--臺灣南端的史前遺址。中國東亞學術研究計劃委員會年報，6，1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.邱敏勇(20020200)。家豬或野豬﹖--再論十三行遺址出土豬的畜養和狩獵。古今論衡，7，24-36。  延伸查詢new window
38.趙榮台、方國運(1988)。臺灣野豬（Sus scrofa taivanus）之生物學初探。林業試驗所研究報告季刊，3(1)，353-362。  延伸查詢new window
39.賴景陽(1984)。臺灣的古獸。動物園雜誌，4(1)，12-15。  延伸查詢new window
40.蘇肇凱(1959)。台灣先史時代遺跡出土動物骨髓研究。人類學研究，6(1)，133-170。  延伸查詢new window
41.Okumura, N.、Ishiguro, N.、Nakano, M.、Hirai, K.、Matsui, A.、Sahara, M.(1996)。Geographic population structure and sequence divergence in the mitochondrial DNA control region of the Japanese wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax), with reference to those of domestic pigs。Biochemical Genetics，34，179-189。  new window
42.Otsuka, Hiroyuki(19840600)。Stratigraphic Position of the Chochen Vertebrate Fauna of the T'ouk' oushan Group in the Environs of the chochen District, Southwest Taiwan, with Special Reference to Its Geologic Age。Journal of Taiwan Museum，37(1)，37-55。  new window
43.Rolett, Barry V.、Chiu, Min Y.(1994)。Age estimation of prehistoric pigs (Sus scrofa) by molar eruption and attrition。Journal of Archaeological Science，21(3)，377-386。  new window
44.Szabó, K.、O'Connor, S.(2004)。Migration and complexity in Holocene Island Southeast Asia。World Archaeology，36(4)，621-628。  new window
45.Larson, Greger、Cucchi, Thomas、Fujita, Masakatsu、Matisoo-Smith, Elizabeth、Robins, Judith、Anderson, Atholl、Rolett, Barry、Spriggs, Matthew、Dolman, Gaynor、Kim, Tae-Hun、Thuy, Nguyen Thi Dieu、Randi, Ettore、Doherty, Moira、Due, Rokus Awe、Bollt, Robert、Djubiantono, Tony、Griffin, Bion、Intoh, Michiko、Keane, Emile、Kirch, Patrick、Li, Kuang-Ti、Morwood, Michael、Pedrina, Lolita M.、Piper, Philip J.、Rabett, Ryan J.、Shooter, Peter、Van den Bergh, Gert、West, Eric、Wickler, Stephen、Yuan, Jing、Cooper, Alan、Dobney, Keith(2007)。Phylogeny and Ancient DNA of Sus Provides Insights into Neolithic Expansion in Island Southeast Asia and Oceania。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，104(12)，4834-4839。  new window
46.洪曉純(20050600)。Neolithic Interaction between Taiwan and Northern Luzon: The Pottery and Jade Evidences from the Cagayan Valley。南島研究學報，1(1)，109-133。new window  new window
47.陳光祖(20000600)。試論臺灣各時代的哺乳動物群及其相關問題--臺灣地區動物考古學研究的基礎資料之一 (下篇)。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，71(2)，367-457+497-503。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.陳光祖(20000300)。試論臺灣各時代的哺乳動物群及其相關問題--臺灣地區動物考古學研究的基礎資料之一 (上篇)。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，71(1)，129-198+237-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.臧振華(2013)。八仙洞考古的新發現兼論臺灣舊石器文化的年代與類緣問題。臺北：中央研究院。379-416。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李匡悌、朱有田(2013)。恆春半島史前野豬家養的形態學觀察和同位素標記驗證 (計畫編號：99-2410-H-00I-007-MY2)。  延伸查詢new window
2.李匡悌、臧振華、朱有田、姜延年、Dobney, K.(2008)。從臺灣出發？經由家豬形制測量學和遺傳標誌驗證南島語族原鄉論與傳播路徑 (計畫編號：RG008-D-07)。  延伸查詢new window
3.臧振華、陳文山、李匡悌(2009)。台東縣長潰鄉八仙洞遺址調查研究計畫（第一年）。中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.臧振華、陳文山、李匡悌(2011)。台東縣長潰鄉八仙洞遺址調查研究計畫（第二年）。  延伸查詢new window
5.瞿海源、張珣(1989)。民間信仰與經濟發展。南投：臺灣省民政廳。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙榮台、方國運(1988)。臺灣野豬(Sus scrofa taivanus)之生態與行為研究。臺北：行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.李光周、鄭永勝、凌平彰、陳維鈞、韓旭東、陳有貝(1985)。墾丁國家公園考古調查報告。國立臺灣大學文學院人類學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林秀嫚(1997)。十三行遺址出土動物骨酪之初步分析--以豬下顎骨為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳幸如(2009)。狩獵與危害防治對臺灣野豬(Susscrofataivanus)族群影響之探討(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳佳萱(2012)。臺灣梅花鹿、水鹿、蘭嶼豬與桃園豬粒線體DNA序列與親緣關係之研究(博士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張偉華(2007)。以微衛星標記分析保種蘭嶼豬遺傳多型性與臺灣地區外來豬種間之類緣關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳幸如(1993)。臺灣野豬棲地利用及行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.克羅斯比、鄭明萱(2013)。哥倫布大交換：一四九二年以後的生物影響和文化衝擊。臺北：城邦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱仕炎、曾憲斌、鄭森淵(1982)。臺灣畜牧獸醫事業--養豬篇。南投：臺灣省政府農林廳。  延伸查詢new window
3.張秀鑒、黃鈺嘉、吳明哲、李世昌(1998)。豬經濟性狀測定與品種改良。臺南：臺灣省畜產試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Avise, J. C.(1994)。Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution。New York：Chapman and Hall。  new window
5.Mayer, J. J.、Brisbin, I. L.(1991)。Wild boar in the United States: their history, comparative morphology, and current status。Athens：University of Georgia Press。  new window
6.von den Driesch, A.(1976)。A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Hillson, Simon(1986)。Teeth。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Nei, M.、Kumar, S.(2000)。Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.袁靖(2009)。中國古代家豬的鑒定標準。科技考古文集。北京：文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張秀鑒、鄒會良、池雙慶(2001)。品種與遺傳改良。畜牧要覽--養豬篇。臺北：中國畜牧學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bull, G.、Payne, S.(1982)。Tooth eruption and epiphyseal fusion in pigs and wild boar。Aging and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites。Oxford：British Archaeological Reports。  new window
4.Grubb, P.(2005)。Order Artiodactyla。Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference。Baltimore：The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
5.Hongo, H.、Meadow, R. H.(1998)。Pig Exploitation at Neolithic Cayoou Tepesi (Southeastern Anatolia)。Ancestors for the Pigs: Pigs in Prehistory。Philadelphia：MASCA, Uoiversity of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology。  new window
6.Hongo, H.、Meadow, R. H.(2000)。Faunal remains from Prepottery Neolithic levels at Çayönü, Southeastern Turkey: A Prelimioary Report Focusiog 0n Pigs (Sus sp.)。Archaeozoology of the Near East。Groniogen：ARC publications。  new window
7.Hongo, H.、Meadow, R. H.(2002)。The Process of ungu1ate domestication in Prepottery Neo1ithic Çayönü, Southeastem Turkey。Archaeozoology of the Near East。Groningen：ARC publications。  new window
8.King, J. W. B.(1991)。Pig breeds of the world: Their distribution and adaptation。World Animal Science, B8-Genetic Resource of Pigs, Sheep, and Goat。Amsterdam：E1sevier Science Publishers。  new window
9.Peters, J.、Helmer, D.、von den Driesch, A.、Saña Segui, M.(2005)。The upper Euphrates-Tigris basin: cradle of agro-pastoralism?。The First Steps of Animal Domestication。Oxford：Oxbow Books。  new window
10.Rosenberg, M.、Redding R. W.(1998)。Early pig husbandry in southwestem Asia and its implications for modeling the origins of food production。Ancestors for the Pigs。  new window
11.祁國琴、何傳坤、張鈞翔(1997)。臺灣更新世豬類化石。演化的實證--紀念楊鍾健教授百年誕辰論文集。北京：海洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Grant, A.(1982)。The use of tooth wear as a guide to the age of domestic ungulates。Aging and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：362（臺灣：358，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67160557
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上