:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以科技接受模式理論探究教師對電子白板融入教學的接受與使用情形
書刊名:教育學報
作者:羅藝方楊淑晴 引用關係吳妹容
作者(外文):Luo, Yi-fangYang, Shu-chingWu, Mei-rong
出版日期:2015
卷期:43:2
頁次:頁145-172
主題關鍵詞:電子白板電子白板融入教學科技接受模式互動式教學Interactive whiteboardIWB for instructionTechnology acceptance modelTeaching interaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:29
電子白板(interactive whiteboard,下稱IWB)強大而多樣化的互動功能是融入教學的最大優勢,亦是教育界大力推廣的主因。本研究以科技接受模式為理論基礎,探討教師對於IWB功能的使用與IWB教學接受度之關係。本研究發現進階層次的互動功能無法有效預測教師對IWB融入教學的認知有用性。而且就算教師對IWB技術的使用具有高度信心,仍偏向使用基本層次的互動功能;在教學互動上,則着重在教師與IWB間的互動,對於「教師-機器-學生」之間這種真正的實踐互動式教學則比較缺乏。本研究根據研究結果與討論,提出教育實務與未來研究的建議。
The strong and diverse interactive functions of interactive whiteboards (IWB) are the main factors for the education sector in accepting, adopting and promoting IWB for instruction. This study, using the technology acceptance model as the theoretical basis, explored the relation between teachers’ use of IWB functions and their acceptance of IWB for instruction. The high interactivity of IWB has been regarded as a key factor to enhance the effectiveness of teaching and learning. Nevertheless, this study found that although the advanced functions of IWB have higher interactive features, they cannot effectively predict “the perceived usefulness” of IWB for instruction. Furthermore, although teachers have confidence in the use of IWB, they still tend to use the basic functions even more than the advanced functions. As for the interaction during instruction, teachers also tend to interact between themselves and the IWB instead of among themselves, the machine and students. However, it is the latter kind of interaction that can really help students participate in the classroom. Finally, based on the findings and discussions of this study, recommendations are suggested for educational practice and future research.
期刊論文
1.Turel, Y. K.、Johnson, T. E.(2012)。Teachers' belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning。Educational Technology & Society,15(1),381-394。  new window
2.Chen, C. F.、Chen, P. C.(2011)。Applying the TAM to Travelers' Usage Intentions of GPS Devices。Expert Systems with Applications,38(5),6217-6221。  new window
3.林志隆、周士雄(2010)。屏東縣e化示範點學校教師應用互動式電子白板教學之創新接受度與科技接受度。教學科技與媒體,93,77-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Schmid, Euline Cutrim(2008)。Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology。Computers and Education,51(4),1553-1568。  new window
5.Sad, S. N.、Ozhan, U.(2012)。Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students' views on instruction with interactive whiteboard。Computers & Education,59(4),1184-1191。  new window
6.Ttirel, Y. K.(2011)。An interactive whiteboard student survey: Development, validity and reliability。Computers & Education,57(4),2441-2450。  new window
7.張基成、王秋錳(20080300)。臺北市高職教師資訊科技融入教學之影響因素。教育實踐與研究,21(1),97-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃素霞、黃書猛(20130800)。以科技接受模式探討互動式電子白板融入學習之成效。管理資訊計算,2(1),262-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Liang, T. H.、Huang, Y. M.、Tsai, C. C.(2012)。An investigation of teaching and learning interaction factors for the use of the interactive whiteboard technology。Educational Technology & Society,15(4),356-367。  new window
10.Santouridis, I.、Kyritsi, M.(2014)。Investigating the Determinants of Internet Banking Adoption in Greece。Procedia Economics and Finance,9,501-510。  new window
11.林錦煌、葉芝妤(20141200)。國中數學課程融入互動式電子白板之研究。工業科技教育學刊,6,67-77。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳致維、林建仲(2009)。互動式電子白板在國小教學之探討。生活科技教育月刊,42(6),14-25。  延伸查詢new window
13.Wall, K.、Higgins, S.、Smith, H.(2005)。"The visual helps me understand the complicated things": Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards。British Journal of Educational Technology,36(5),851-867。  new window
14.Wong, K. T.、Teo, T.、Goh, P. S. C.(2014)。Development of the Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance Scale (IWBAS): An initial study。Educational Technology & Society,17(4),268-277。  new window
15.Türel, Y. K.、Demirli, C.(2010)。Instructional interactive whiteboard materials: Designers' perspectives。Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences,9,1437-1442。  new window
16.Tang, Thomas Li-Ping、Austin, M. Jill(2009)。Students' perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance。Computers & Education,53(4),1241-1255。  new window
17.Shenton, A.、Pagett, L.(2007)。From "bored" to screen: The use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England。Literacy,41(3),129-136。  new window
18.Slay, H.、Siebörger, I.、Hodgkinson-Williams, C.(2008)。Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty of just "lipstick"?。Computers & Education,51(3),1321-1341。  new window
19.Quashie, V.(2009)。How interactive is the interactive whiteboard?。Mathematics Teaching,214,33-38。  new window
20.Martin, S. F.、Shaw, E. L., Jr.、Daughenbaugh, L.(2014)。Using smart boards and manipulatives in the elementary science classroom。TechTrends,58(3),90-96。  new window
21.Moreno, R.(2006)。Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments。Current Directions in Psychological Science,15(2),63-67。  new window
22.Özerbaş, M. A.(2012)。The effect of using interactive whiteboards in the course of teaching technologies and material designing towards student achievement and retention。International Journal of Academic Research,4(6),151-157。  new window
23.Kennewell, S.、Tanner, H.、Jones, S.、Beauchamp, G.(2008)。Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,24(1),61-73。  new window
24.Hur, J. W.、Suh, S.(2012)。Making learning active with interactive whiteboards, podcasts, and digital storytelling in ELL classrooms。Computers in the Schools,29(4),320-338。  new window
25.Hora, M. T.、Anderson, C.(2012)。Perceived norms for interactive teaching and their relationship to instructional decision-making: A mixed methods study。Higher Education,64(4),573-592。  new window
26.Hockly, N.(2013)。Technology for the language teacher: Interactive whiteboards。ELT Journal,67(3),354-358。  new window
27.Hennessy, S.(2011)。The role of digital artefacts on the interactive whiteboard in supporting classroom dialogue。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27(6),463-489。  new window
28.Beauchamp, G.、Parkinson, J.(2005)。Beyond the "wow" factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard。School Science Review,86(316),97-103。  new window
29.Armstrong, V.、Barnes, S.、Sutherland, R.、Curran, S.、Mills, S.、Thompson, I.(2005)。Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology。Educational Review,57(4),455-467。  new window
30.張雅玲、徐新逸(20001200)。e世代國小職前教師資訊素養之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,38(2),203-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Wood, R.、Ashfield, J.(2008)。The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study。British Journal of Educational Technology,39(1),84-96。  new window
32.Smith, F.、Hardman, F.、Higgins, S.(2006)。The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies。British Educational Research Journal,32(3),443-457。  new window
33.Sakar, A.、Ercetin, G.(2005)。Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,21(1),28-38。  new window
34.Plass, Jan L.、Chun, Dorothy M.、Mayer, Richard E.、Leutner, Detlev(2003)。Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities。Computers in Human Behavior,19(2),221-243。  new window
35.Kennewell, S.、Beauchamp, G.(2007)。The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning。Learning, Media and Technology,32(3),227-241。  new window
36.Higgins, D.、Beauchamp, G.、Miller, D.(2007)。Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards。Learning, Media and Technology,32(3),213-225。  new window
37.Hall, I.、Higgins, S.(2005)。Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,21(2),102-117。  new window
38.Glover, D.、Miller, D.(2001)。Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school。Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education,10(3),257-276。  new window
39.郭吉模(20031100)。現行資訊融入教學推展的問題及因應策略。學校行政,28,86-95。  延伸查詢new window
40.黃政傑、江海韻、李明芳、汪履維、林淑媛、陳達萱、陳麗華、彭增龍、甄曉蘭(20100600)。論壇:中小學自編教材面面觀--政策與實務的對話。教科書研究,3(1),135-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Beauchamp, G.(2004)。Teacher Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Primary Schools: towards an effective transition framework。Technology, Pedagogy and Education,13(3),327-348。  new window
42.Venkatesh, V.、Davis, F. D.(1996)。A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development & Test。Decision Sciences,27(3),451-481。  new window
43.Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L.、Tractinsky, Noam、Vitale, Michael(2000)。Consumer Trust in an Internet Store。Information Technology and Management,1(1/2),45-71。  new window
44.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
45.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
46.Baumgartner, Hans、Homburg, Christian(1996)。Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review。International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(2),139-161。  new window
47.Gefen, David、Straub, Detmar W.、Boudreau, Marie-Claude(2000)。Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice。Communications of the Association for Information Systems,4,(7)1-(7)77。  new window
48.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55。  new window
49.Davis, Fred D.、Bagozzi, Richard P.、Warshaw, Paul R.(1989)。User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models。Management Science,35(8),982-1003。  new window
會議論文
1.謝佳容、王子華、沈怡秀(2010)。以科技接受模式理論探討國民小學教師使用互動式電子白板之接受度調査研究。2010電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會,國立新竹教育大學 。新竹市:國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dhindsa, H. S.、Emran, S. H.(2006)。Use of the interactive whiteboard in constructivist teaching for higher student achievement。The second annual conference for the Middle East teachers of science, mathematics, and computing。Abu Dhabi, UAE:METSMaC。175-188。  new window
3.洪銘健、楊人和、張智傑(2012)。科技融入教學之衝突與省思--以電子白板教學為例。第十八屆資訊管理暨實務研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳惠邦(2006)。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考。2006年全球華人資訊教育創新論壇,臺北市政府主辦 (會議日期: 2006年12月19日)。宜蘭縣。29。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2014)。性別統計指標彙總性資料--教職員。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Davis, Fred D.(1986)。A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and result(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
圖書
1.Mayer, Richard E.(2001)。Multimedia learning。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.(2006)。Multivariate data analysis。Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Fishbein, Martin、Ajzen, Icek(1975)。Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
其他
1.Wanigasekera, E. T.(20080727)。Interactive whiteboard technology in education,http://www.asiantribune.com/node/12409。  new window
2.Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(2004)。LISREL 8.7,Skokie, IL:Scientific Software International。  new window
3.教育部(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書,http://Orz.tw/7HmKg., 2009/10/07。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Browne, Michael W.、Cudeck, Robert(1993)。Alternative ways of assessing model fit。Testing Structural Equation Models。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE