:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數學臆測探究教學對商職學生數學學習成就與動機之影響
書刊名:臺灣數學教育期刊
作者:秦爾聰 引用關係劉致演張克旭段曉林 引用關係
作者(外文):Chin, Erh-tsungLiu, Chih-yenChang, Ke-hsuTuan, Hsiao-lin
出版日期:2015
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁53-83
主題關鍵詞:探究教學數學臆測學習成就學習動機Inquiry teachingMathematical conjecturingLearning achievementLearning motivation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:172
本研究旨於探討數學臆測探究教學策略對於商職二年級學生數學學習動機及學習成就的影響。研究設計 採準實驗研究之不等組前後測設計;資料收集及分析採量為主質為輔的方式進行。兩個案班級各39 人, 隸屬同一任課教師,為中部某公立家商二年級學生。實驗組採臆測探究教學,控制組則維持傳統講述式教 學;研究時程共歷經一整個學年。評量學生數學學習動機工具為數學學習動機問卷,檢驗學生學習成效工 具為六次段考成績。研究結果發現,臆測探究教學組學生動機提升與傳統教學組學生間存在顯著差異,學 習成就雖未存在顯著差異卻呈現穩定成長的態勢。顯示在臆測探究教學環境脈絡下,學生願意主動參與 學習、採用不同策略解決問題、重視數學學習價值,在精熟目標導向引導下期許自己是高自我效能的學習 者,進而在學習成就上呈現穩定成長的狀態。
This study aims to investigate the influences of conjecturing-inquiry teaching on commercial vocational high school students’ achievements and motivation toward mathematics learning. The quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design is adopted. There are thirty-nine students of each of the two groups, which are grade ten and taught by the same mathematics teacher from a public vocational high school in the middle of Taiwan. The conjecturing-inquiry teaching has been adopted in the experimental group for a whole academic year, while the traditional expository teaching in the control group. The instrument for examining students’ motivation toward mathematics learning is the “Students’ Motivation toward Mathematics Learning Questionnaire”, and for assessing students’ learning achievements the six school sectional examinations. The research results indicate that the students of the experimental group show significantly higher motivation toward mathematics learning than those of the control group. Although there is no significant difference between their learning achievements, the students of the experimental group have made steady progress in the six school sectional examinations during the whole academic year. Therefore, it seems to reveal that, under the conjecturing-inquiry teaching environment, students are more willing to get involved in their learning actively, to try different strategies to solve mathematics problems, to value the importance of mathematics learning, and to consider themselves as a learner of high selfefficacy under the goal of mastery. Besides, they are able to make steady progress in their mathematics learning as well.
期刊論文
1.Lin, Y.、Mckeachie, W. J.、Kim, Y. C.(2003)。College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning。Learning and Individual Differences,13(3),251-258。  new window
2.Schiefele, U.、Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1995)。Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(2),163-181。  new window
3.Lepper, Mark R.(1988)。Motivational considerations in the study of instruction。Cognition and Instruction,5(4),289-309。  new window
4.Stacey, K.(1989)。Finding and using patterns in linear generalizing problem。Educational Studies in Mathematics,20(2),147-164。  new window
5.Cobb, P.、Yackel, E.(1996)。Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27(4),458-477。  new window
6.Middleton, J. A.、Spanias, P. A.(1999)。Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalization, and criticisms of the research。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,30(1),65-88。  new window
7.Baxter, J. A.、Williams, S.(2010)。Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling。Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,13(1),7-26。  new window
8.Gravemeijer, K.(1997)。Commentary solving word problems: A case of modelling?。Learning and Instruction,7(4),389-397。  new window
9.Kwon, O. N.、Park, J. S.、Park, J. H.(2006)。Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach。Asia Pacific Educational Review,7(1),51-61。  new window
10.Meyer, M.(2010)。Abduction--A logical view of investigation and initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherence。Educational Studies in Mathematics,74(2),185-205。  new window
11.Siegel, J.、Borasi, R.、Fonzi, J.(1998)。Supporting students' mathematical inquiries through reading。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,29(4),378-413。  new window
12.Cobb, P.、Wood, T.、Yackel, E.、Perlwitz, M.(1992)。A follow-up assessment of a second-grade problem-centered mathematics project。Educational Studies in Mathematics,23(5),483-504。  new window
13.Pirie, S. E. B.、Kieren, T. E.(1992)。Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics。Educational Studies in Mathematics,23(5),505-528。  new window
14.Cañadas, M. C.、Deulofeu, J.、Figueiras, L.、Reid, D.、Yevdokimov, O.(2007)。The conjecturing process: Perspectives in theory and implications in practice。Journal of Teaching and Learning,5(1),55-72。  new window
15.Tuan, H.-L.、Chin, C.-C.、Shieh, S.-H.(2005)。The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning。International Journal of Science Education,27(6),639-654。  new window
16.王雅玲、秦爾聰(20080900)。實施探究教學對學生數學焦慮的影響。台灣數學教師(電子)期刊,15,41-53+55-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.紀雅芳、溫媺純(20080300)。5E學習環融入數學探究教學對國中生學習動機之影響。台灣數學教師(電子)期刊,13,1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.秦爾聰、劉致演、尤昭奇(20150400)。探討七年級學生在以臆測為中心的數學探究教學脈絡下其數學素養展現情形。臺灣數學教師,36(1),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭如雯(2009)。芬蘭與台灣高職教育之比較。學校行政,59,216-232。  延伸查詢new window
20.Cheung, K. C.(1988)。Outcomes of schooling: Mathematics achievement and attitudes towards mathematics learning in Hong Kong。Educational Studies in Mathematics,19(2),209-219。  new window
21.Cobb, P.、Wood, T.、Yackel, E.、Nicholls, J.、Wheatley, G.、Trigatti, B.、Perlwitz, M.(1991)。Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,22(1),3-29。  new window
22.Ma, X.、Xu, J.(2004)。Determining the causal ordering between attitude toward mathematics and achievement。American Journal of Education,110(3),256-280。  new window
23.Middleton, J. A.(1995)。A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(3),254-279。  new window
24.Morrone, A. S.、Harkness, S. S.、D'Ambrosio, B.、Caulfield, R.(2004)。Patterns of instructional discourse that promote the perception of mastery goals in a social constructivist mathematics course。Educational Studies in Mathematics,56(1),19-38。  new window
25.Reynolds, A. J.、Walberg, H. J.(1992)。A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school。Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),371-382。  new window
26.Singh, K.、Granville, M.、Dika, S.(2002)。Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement。The Journal of Educational Research,95(6),323-332。  new window
27.Simon, M. A.(1995)。Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(2),114-145。  new window
28.Ames, C.(1992)。Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation。Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271。  new window
29.Duda, Joan L.、Nicholls, John G.(1992)。Dimensions of Achievement Motivation in Schoolwork and Sport。Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),290-299。  new window
30.Dweck, Carol S.(1986)。Motivational Processes Affecting Learning。American Psychologist,41(10),1040-1048。  new window
31.Skemp, Richard R.(1976)。Relational understanding and instrumental understanding。Mathematics Teaching,77,20-26。  new window
32.Koller, O.、Baumert, J.、Schnabel, K.(2001)。Does Interest Matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics。National Council of Teachers of Mathematics,32(5),448-470。  new window
會議論文
1.Kilpatrick, J.(1987)。What constructivism might be in mathematics education。the Eleventh Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education。Montreal:PME。3-27。  new window
學位論文
1.余鴻穎(2006)。高職學生數學學習困擾與學習態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.National Research Council(1989)。Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
2.Borasi, R.(1992)。Learning mathematics through inquiry。Heinemann。  new window
3.Fernandez , C.、Yoshida, M.(2004)。Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc。  new window
4.Brophy, J. E.(1998)。Motivating students to learn。Boston。  new window
5.Lakatos, Imre(1976)。Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery。Cambridge。  new window
6.Pintrich, P. R.、Schunk, D. H.(2002)。The Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill。  new window
7.Baroody, A. J.、Coslick, R. T.(1993)。Problem solving, reasoning, and communication, K-8: Help children think mathematically。New York, NY:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
8.Mason, J.、Burton, L.、Stacey, K.(2010)。Thinking mathematically。Pearson Education Limited。  new window
9.Ernest, Paul(1991)。The Philosophy of Mathematics Education。London。  new window
10.Davis, P. J.、Hersh, R.、Marchisotto, E. A.(1995)。The Mathematical Experience。Birkhäuser。  new window
11.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1991)。Professional standards for teaching mathematics。National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
12.Jaworski, B.(1994)。Investigating mathematics teaching: a constructivist enquiry。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
13.Polya, G.(1954)。Mathematics and plausible reasoning, Volume 1: Induction and analogy in mathematics。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
14.教育部(2012)。「找對方向-技職不可限量」技職教育政策與發展。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
15.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
16.Dewey, John(1938)。Experience and Education。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
17.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
18.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
其他
1.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics,Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。,http://standards.nctm.org/document。  new window
圖書論文
1.Richards, J.(1991)。Mathematical discussion。Radical constructivism in mathematics。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
2.Ryan, R. M.、Deci, E. L.(2000)。When Rewards Compete with Nature: The Undermining of Intrinsic Motivation and Self-regulaton。Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
3.Kent, B.(1997)。The interconnectedness of Peirce's diagrammatic thought。Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce。Indianapolis, IN:Indiana University Press。  new window
4.Peirce, C. S.(1955)。The nature of mathematics。Philosophical writings of Peirce。New York, NY:Dover。  new window
5.Yerushalmy, M.(1993)。Generalization in Geometry。The geometric supposer: What it is a case of?。Hove:London:Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Franke, M. L.、Kazemi, E.、Battey, D.(2007)。Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing。  new window
7.Hannula, M. S.(2006)。Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions。Educational studies in mathematics。  new window
8.Wiliam, D.(2007)。Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and regulation of learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE