:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中流砥柱:嬰兒潮世代的家庭代間支持類型分析
書刊名:人類發展與家庭學報
作者:黃秋華
作者(外文):Huang, Chiu-hua
出版日期:2016
卷期:17
頁次:頁50-66
主題關鍵詞:嬰兒潮世代代間支持類型潛在類型分析代間關係臺灣社會變遷基本調查Baby boomersIntergenerational support typesLatent class analysisIntergenerational relationshipsTaiwan social change survey
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:112
  • 點閱點閱:14
本研究關注嬰兒潮世代,探討其與老年父母、成年子女三代之間的代間支持類型,並分析影響代間支持類型之因素。運用2011年之「臺灣地區社會變遷基本調查計畫」第六期第二次調查家庭組資料進行分析,選取:1949年至1966年出生之樣本,並且「至少有一名父母存活」與「至少有一名成年子女」之嬰兒潮世代。研究發現:三代的代間支持類型,呈現出「由下奉養型」、「支持上下型」及「低交換型」樣貌。再者,成年子女的婚姻與工作狀況與嬰兒潮世代的家庭代間支持類型之關聯最爲顯著,而三代同住的居住安排則是增加了嬰兒潮世代提供老年父母支持協助的機率。
This study examined a typology of multigenerational support exchange of Baby Boomers, their aging parents and adult children. Using data from the 2011 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 6, Year 2, Family Questionnaire). In this study, subjects were born between 1949 and 1966, with at least one aging parent still alive and one adult child were analyzed. Latent Class Analyses was applied to develop intergenerational support types for (a) upward support, (b) support up and down, and (c) low exchange. The Baby Boomers whose adult children were single, or unemployed have a higher probability of falling into the "support up and down" type. While the Baby Boomers live with their aging parents and adult children, it increases the likelihood to become the "upward support" type.
期刊論文
1.伊慶春(2014)。臺灣家庭代間關係的持續改變:資源規範的交互作用。社會學研究,3,189-215。  延伸查詢new window
2.Asao, Y.(2007)。Asao Outlook on the Retirement Process of Dankai No Sedai, or the Japanese Baby-boom Generation。Japan Labor Review,4(4),121-137。  new window
3.Dykstra, P. A.、Fokkema, F.(2011)。Relationships between Parents and Their Adult Children A West European Typology of Late-life Families。Ageing & Society,31(4),545-569。  new window
4.Fingerman, K. L.、Pillemer, K. A.、Silverstein, M.、Suitor, J. J.(2012)。The Baby Boomers' Intergenerational Relationships。The Gerontologist,52(2),199-209。  new window
5.Igarashi, H.、Hooker, K.、Coehlo, D. P.、Manoogian, M.(2013)。My nest is full: Intergenerational relationships at midlife。Journal of Aging Studies,27,102-112。  new window
6.Mcllvane, J. M.、Ajrouch, K. J.、Antonucci, T. C.(2007)。Generational Structure and Social Resources in Mid-life Influences on Health and Well-being。Journal of Social Issues,63(4),759-773。  new window
7.Schoeni, R. F.、Freedman V. A.、Martin, L. G.(2008)。Why is Late-Life Disability Declining?。The Milbank Quarterly,86,47-89。  new window
8.Szydlik, M.(2008)。Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict。Journal of Comparative Family Studies,39(1),97-114。  new window
9.Van Gaalen, R. I.、Dykstra, P. A.(2006)。Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: A latent class analysis。Journal of Marriage and Family,68(4),947-960。  new window
10.Lin, Ju-Ping、Yi, Chin-Chun(2013)。A comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia。International Sociology,28(3),297-315。  new window
11.Park, Keong-suk、Phua, Voonchin、McNally, James、Sun, Rongjun(2005)。Diversity and Structure of Intergenerational Relationships: Elderly Parent-Adult Child Relations in Korea。Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology,20(4),285-305。  new window
12.Allen, Katherine R.、Blieszner, Rosemary、Roberto, Karen A.(2000)。Families in the Middle and Later Years: A Review and Critique of Research in the 1990s。Journal of Marriage and Family,62(4),911-926。  new window
13.Lin, I. F.、Goldman, N.、Weinstein, M.、Lin, Y. H.、Gorrindo, T.、Seeman, T.(2003)。Gender differences in adult children's support of their parents in Taiwan。Journal of Marriage and Family,65(1),184-200。  new window
14.Hogan, Dennis P.、Eggebeen, David J.、Clogg, Clifford C.(1993)。The Structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in American Families。American Journal of Sociology,98(6),1428-1458。  new window
15.Mancini, J. A.、Blieszner, R.(1989)。Aging parents and adult children: Research themes in intergenerational relations。Journal of Marriage and the Family,51,275-290。  new window
16.Pruchno, R.(2012)。Not your mother's old age: Baby Boomers at age 65。Gerontologist,52(2),149-152。  new window
17.Pillemer, K.、Suitor, J. J.(2002)。Explaining Mothers' Ambivalence toward Their Children。Journal of Marriage and Family,64(3),602-613。  new window
18.薛承泰(20031200)。臺灣地區人口特質與趨勢:對社會福利政策的幾個啟示。國家政策季刊,2(4),1-22。  延伸查詢new window
19.Lowenstein, A.、Daatland, S. O.(2006)。Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study。Ageing & Society,26(2),203-223。  new window
20.Yi, Chin-chun、Lin, Ju-ping(2009)。Types of Relations between Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms Accounting for Various Relational Types。Journal of Comparative Family Studies,40(2),305-324。  new window
21.Lin, Ju-ping、Yi, Chin-chun(2011)。Filial Norms and Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents in China and Taiwan。International Journal of Social Welfare,20(S1),S109-S120。  new window
22.葉光輝(19980600)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究:孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,83,121-168。  延伸查詢new window
23.李瑞金、盧羿廷(20050600)。嬰兒潮世代婦女老年生活準備之初探與因應。社區發展季刊,110,111-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Lin, Ju-Ping、Chang, Tse-Fan、Huang, Chiu-Hua(2011)。Intergenerational Relations and Life Satisfaction among Older Women in Taiwan。International Journal of Social Welfare,20(S1),S47-S58。  new window
研究報告
1.林如萍(2015)。嶄新的老年圖像?嬰兒潮世代的家庭代間關係與老年生活規畫 (計畫編號:MOST 103-2410-H-003-072)。  延伸查詢new window
2.國家發展委員會(2014)。中華民國人口推計(103至150年)。臺北:中華民國國家發展委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2012)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第六期第二次調查計畫執行報告。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cochran, L.、Rothschadl, A. M.、Rudick, J. L.(2009)。Leisure Programming for Baby Boomers。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
2.Whitbourne, S. K.、Wills, S. L.(2006)。The Baby Boomers Grow up: Contemporary Perspectives on Midlife。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
3.王濟川、郭志剛(2004)。Logistic迴歸模型:方法及應用。臺北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱皓政(20080000)。潛在類別模式:原理與技術。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃俊傑(20060000)。戰後臺灣的轉型及其展望。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部戶政司(2013)。內部百年人口歷年資料,http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部(2009)。老人狀況調查,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_ist_no=312&fod_list_no=4696。  new window
3.American Association of Retired Persons(2001)。In the Middle A Report on Multicultural Boomers Coping with Family and Aging Issues,http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/in_the_middle.pdf。  new window
4.Seoul National University Institute on Aging(2011)。Korean Baby Boomers in Transition,https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/publications/studies/2011/mmi-korean-boomers-.pdf。  new window
5.孔祥明(2006)。臺灣「家庭社會學」研究之回顧與展望,臺中市:臺中東海大學社會科學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hagestad, Gunhild O.,Herlofson, Katharina(2007)。Micro and Macro Perspectives on Intergenerational Relations and Transfers in Europe,http://www.un.org/esa/population/meetings/EGMPopAge/EGMPopAge_17_GHagestad.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.林如萍(2012)。臺灣家庭的代間關係與互動類型。臺灣的社會變遷1985-2005:婚姻與家庭,臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一。臺北市:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Alwin, D. F.(2011)。Demographic Transitions and Life-Span Development。Handbook of lifespan development。New York:Springer Publishers。  new window
3.Amato, P. R.(2005)。Family change: Decline or resilience?。Sourcebook of Family Theory and Research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
4.Bengtson, V. L.、Schrader S. S.(1982)。Parent-Child Relations。Research Instruments in Social Gerontology。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
5.Hanson, S. M.、Sauer, W. J.(1985)。Children and Their Elderly Parents。Social Support Networks and the Care of the Elderly。New York:Springer。  new window
6.Lin, J. P.(2015)。Life Satisfaction Among Older Adults in Taiwan: The Effects of Marital Relations and Intergenerational Relations。Successful Aging: Asian Perspectives。New York:Springer。  new window
7.伊慶春、章英華(2008)。父系家庭的持續與變遷:臺灣家庭社會學研究,1960-2000。群學爭鳴:臺灣社會學發展史,1945-2005。臺北:群學。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bengtson, V. L.、Elder, G. H.、Putney, N. M.(2005)。The life course perspective on ageing: Link lives, timing, and history。The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Attias-Donfut, C.、Wolff, F. C.(2000)。The Redistributive Effects of Generational Transfers。The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies。London:Routledge。  new window
10.Attias-Donfut, C.、Arber, S.(2000)。Equity and Solidarity Across the Generations。The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Aging Societies。London:Routledge。  new window
11.Faust, K.、McKibben, J.(1999)。Marital Dissolution: Divorce Separation, Annulment, and Widowhood。Handbook of Marriage and the Family。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
12.葉光輝(1997)。台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
13.葉光輝、劉長萱(2002)。問題的潛在類別分析。社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE