| 期刊論文| 1. | 邱文聰(20080600)。被忽略的(立法)事實：探詢實證科學在規範論證中的可能角色兼評釋字第584號解釋。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，37(2)，233-284。 延伸查詢 | | 2. | 廖元豪(20080300)。高深莫測，抑或亂中有序？--論現任大法官在基本權利案件中的「審查基準」。中研院法學期刊，2，211-274。 延伸查詢 | | 3. | 黃昭元(20130600)。大法官解釋審查標準之發展(1996~2011)：比例原則的繼受與在地化。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，42(2)，215-258。 延伸查詢 | | 4. | 王鵬翔、張永健(20150900)。經驗面向的規範意義--論實證研究在法學中的角色。中研院法學期刊，17，205-294。 延伸查詢 | | 5. | Troutman, C. Michael、Shanteau, James(1977)。Inferences based on nondiagnostic information。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，19，43-55。  | | 6. | 王泰升(2011)。四個世代形塑而成的戰後台灣法學。臺大法學論叢，40(特刊)，1367-1428。 延伸查詢 | | 7. | 林超駿(20140400)。初論法庭之友與美國最高法院--兼評大審法草案相關規定。月旦法學，227，198-231。 延伸查詢 | | 8. | Anderson, Helen A.(2015)。Frenemies of the Court: The Many Faces of Amicus Curiae。University of Richmond Law Review，49，361-416。 | | 9. | Bernstein, David E.(2008)。Expert witnesses, Adversarial Bias, and the (Partial) Failure of the Daubert Revolution。Iowa Law Review，93，451-490。 | | 10. | Bernstein, David E.(2013)。The Misbegotten Judicial Resistance to the Daubert Revolution。Notre Dame Law Review，89，27-70。 | | 11. | Brown, Harvey、Davis, Melissa(2014)。Eight Gates for Expert Witnesses: Fifteen Years Later。Houston Law Review，52，1-299。 | | 12. | Cheng, Edward K.、Yoon, Albert H.(2005)。Does Frye or Daubert Matter? A Study of Scientific Admissibility Standards。Virginia Law Review，91(2)，471-513。 | | 13. | Davis, Kenneth Culp(1986)。Judicial, Legislative, and Administrative Lawmaking: A Proposed Research Service for the Supreme Court。Minnesota Law Review，71，1-18。 | | 14. | Cross, Frank B.、Spriggs, James F. II、Johnson, Timothy R.、Wahlbeck, Paul J.(2010)。Citations in the U.S. Supreme Court: An Empirical Study of Their Use and Significance。University of Illinois Law Review，2010，489-576。 | | 15. | Faigman, David L.(2008)。Scientific Realism in Constitutional Law。Brooklyn Law Review，73，1067-1101。 | | 16. | Faigman, David L.(2010)。Evidentiary Incommensurability: A Preliminary Exploration of the Problem of Reasoning from General Scientific Data to Individualized Legal Decision-Making。Brooklyn Law Review，75，1115-1136。 | | 17. | Grofman, Bernard(2013)。Devising A Sensible Trigger for Section 5 of the Voting Right Act。Election Law Journal，12，332-337。 | | 18. | Kearney, Joseph D.、Merrill, Thomas W.(2000)。The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on the Supreme Court。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，148，743-855。 | | 19. | Krafka, Carol、Dunn, Meghan A.、Johnson, Molly Treadway、Cecil, Joe S.、Miletich, Dean(2002)。Judge and Attorney Experiences Practices, and Concerns Regarding Expert Testimony in Federal Civil Trials。Psychology, Public Policy, and Law，8(3)，309-332。 | | 20. | Morawetz, Nancy(2013)。Convenient Facts: Nken v. Holder, the Solicitor General, and the Presentation of Internal Government Facts。New York University Law Review，88，1600-1664。 | | 21. | Orr Larsen, Allison(2012)。Confronting Supreme Court Fact Finding。Virginia Law Review，98，1255-1312。 | | 22. | Larsen, Allison Orr(2014)。The Trouble with Amicus Facts。Virginia Law Review，100，1757-1818。 | | 23. | Posner, Richard A.(1998)。Against Constitutional Theory。New York University Law Review，73，1-22。 | | 24. | Rolong, Angelica(2014)。Access Denied: Why the Supreme Court's Decision in Shelby County v. Holder May Disenfranchise Texas Minority Voters。Texas Tech Law Review，46，519-560。 | | 25. | Rustad, Michael、Koenig, Thomas(1993)。The Supreme Court and Junk Social Science: Selective Distortion in Amicus Briefs。North Carolina Law Review，72，91-162。 | | 26. | Sanders, Joseph(2003)。The Merits of the Paternalistic Justification for Restrictions on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence。Seton Hall Law Review，33，881-941。 | | 27. | Schauer, Frederick、Spellman, Barbara A.(2013)。Is Expert Evidence Really Different?。Notre Dame Law Review，89(1)，1-26。 | | 28. | Smith, H. David、Stasson, Mark F.、Hawkes, William G.(1998)。Dilution in Legal Decision Making: Effect of Non-Diagnostic Information in Relation to Amount of Diagnostic Evidence。Current Psychology，17，333-345。 | | 29. | Faigman, David L.(2013)。The Daubert Revolution and the Birth of Modernity: Managing Scientific Evidence in the Age of Science。University of California Davis Law Review，46(3)，893-930。 | 圖書| 1. | 吳庚、陳淳文(2013)。憲法理論與政府體制。臺北：吳庚。 延伸查詢 | | 2. | 陳瑞麟(20100000)。科學哲學：理論與歷史。臺北：群學。 延伸查詢 | | 3. | Beecher-Monas, Erica(2007)。Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。 | | 4. | Dixon, Lloyd、Gill, Brian(2001)。Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases Since the Daubert Decision。Santa Monica, CA：RAND Corp。 | | 5. | Faigman, David L.(2004)。Laboratory of Justice: The Supreme Court's 200-year Struggle to Integrate Science and the Law。New York, NY：Henry Holt and Company。 | | 6. | Freckelton, Ian、Selby, Hugh(1993)。Expert Evidence。London：Sweet & Maxwell。 | | 7. | Gilson, Cedric Charles(2012)。The Law-Science Chasm: Bridging Law's Disaffection with Science as Evidence。New Orleans, LA：Quid Pro Books。 | | 8. | Jasanoff, Sheila(1995)。Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America。Harvard University Press。 | | 9. | Monahan, John、Walker, Laurens(2010)。Social Science in Law: Cases and Materials。New York, NY：Foundation Press。 | | 10. | Posner, Richard A.(2013)。Reflection On Judging。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。 | | 11. | Schauer, Frederick(2009)。Thinking Like A Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning。Harvard University Press。 | | 12. | Stableford, Brian M.(2006)。Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia。New York, NY：Routledge。 | |