:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從櫥窗到花車:菲律賓政黨體系轉變之剖析
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:翁俊桔呂炳寬 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Chun-chiehLu, Bing-kuan
出版日期:2018
卷期:36:1
頁次:頁179-228
主題關鍵詞:後馬可仕時期政黨體系民主轉型總統花車模式歷史制度主義Post-Marcos eraParty systemDemocratic transformationPresidential bandwagonHistorical institutionalism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:203
  • 點閱點閱:24
政黨政治在菲律賓已經存續超過一個世紀,其不僅是菲國人民參與政治的主要管道,而且也是該國民主發展的關鍵機制。這套機制雖然在「馬可仕時期」曾經被迫停擺,但是在「人民力量革命」的衝撞下,政黨又再度恢復其功能。不過,「民主轉型」(後馬可仕時期)後的菲律賓,似乎不再是過去兩黨輪替的政黨體系型態,取而代之的是多黨林立的現象;該情形並不符合憲政學理的常軌。對此,相關學者認為1987年憲法的頒行似乎是最重要的關鍵,惟該部憲法到底是如何導致菲國的政黨體系轉變呢?雖然沒有取得定論,但是他們卻一致發現「恩從關係」的現象始終充斥其間。基於此,本文除了援引日本學者粕谷祐子(Yuko Kasuya)教授的「總統花車模式」作為印證的基礎外,也嘗試從歷史制度主義的觀點,進一步探討菲國的總統選舉與政黨體系轉變的邏輯關係。
Party politics of the Philippines is known to have been in existence for more than one century. Not only is it the main channel for people to participate in politics, but it is the key mechanism for safeguarding democratic development as well. Although the democratic politics in the Philippines was once suspended during the "Marcos period", the function of party politics had been restored after the "people's power revolution". However, during post-Marcos era, the party system in the Philippines was transferred from a bipartisan rotation pattern to a multi-party pattern. It was true that such a situation did not conform to [the] constitutional theory in the usual way. With regard to the multi-party political practice, some professional scholars believe that the Constitution promulgated in 1987 should be the crucial factor, though there is still no definite answer to the question of how the Constitution resulted in the transformation of the party system. Despite all the arguments, these scholars consistently found that the "patron-client relationship" was present through all political circumstances that followed. In view of this, this article cites the idea of [a] "Presidential Bandwagon" by Japanese scholar Kasuya Yuko as the basis of further study and aims at exploring the logical relationship between the presidential election and the transformation of the party system in the Philippines from the perspective of historical institutionalism.
期刊論文
1.Mahoney, James(2001)。Path-Dependent Explanation of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective。Studies in International Development,36(1),111-141。  new window
2.陳恆鈞、江慧萍(20100900)。樂生事件與新莊捷運線制定之因果關係分析:路徑依賴觀點。東吳政治學報,28(3),129-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Thelen, Kathleen(1999)。Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics。Annual Review of Political Science,2(1),369-404。  new window
4.Ufen, Andreas(2008)。Political Party and Party System Institutionalization in Southeast Asia: Lessons for Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand。Pacific Review,21(3),327-350。  new window
5.徐斯勤(20011200)。新制度主義與當代中國政治研究--理論與應用之間對話的初步觀察。政治學報,32,95-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Krasner, Stephen D.(1984)。Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics。Comparative Politics,16(2),223-246。  new window
7.Hutchcroft, Paul D.(1991)。Oligarchs and Cronies in the Philippine State: the Politics of Patrimonial Plunder。World Politics,43(3),414-450。  new window
8.黃宗昊(20100900)。歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構。問題與研究,49(3),145-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Choi, Jungug(2001)。Philippine Democracies Old and New: Elections, Term Limits, and Party System。Asian Survey,41(3),488-501。  new window
10.Butwell, Richard(1970)。The Philippines under Marcos。Current History,58(344),182-211。  new window
11.Hall, Peter、Taylor, Rosemary(1996)。Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism。Political Studies,45,936-957。  new window
12.Johnson, Juliet(2001)。Path Contingency in Post-Communist Transformations。Comparative Politics,33(3),253-279。  new window
13.Ligeralde, RicaMelanie D.(1997)。Democracy in the Philippines: A Political Culture Approach。Asian Profile,25(2),123-133。  new window
14.Manacsa, Rodelio Cruz、Tan, Alexander C.(2005)。Manufacturing Parties: Re-examining the Transient Nature of Philippine Political Parties。Party Politics,11(6),748-765。  new window
15.Overholt, William H.(1986)。The Rise and Fall of Ferdinand Marcos。Asian Survey,26(11),1137-1163。  new window
16.Pierson, Paul(2000)。Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics。American Political Science Review,49(2),251-267。  new window
17.呂炳寬、張峻豪(20091200)。制度深化或制度演化--我國中央與地方政府覆議權的比較。臺灣民主季刊,6(4),169-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.翁俊桔(20081000)。菲律賓選舉民主的轉變:「質變」亦或「形變」?。臺灣東南亞學刊,5(2),65-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.翁俊桔、顧長永(20120600)。菲律賓2010年總統大選評析。亞太研究論壇,56,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.蘇子喬、王業立(20100900)。為何廢棄混合式選舉制度?--義大利、俄羅斯與泰國選制改革之研究。東吳政治學報,28(3),1-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.王鼎銘、郭銘峰、黃紀(20080900)。選制轉變過程下杜佛傑心理效應之檢視:從日本眾議院選制變革的經驗來觀察。問題與研究,47(3),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.蘇子喬(20101200)。臺灣憲政體制的變遷軌跡(1991~2010):歷史制度論的分析。東吳政治學報,28:(4),147-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.吳玉山(20011200)。制度、結構與政治穩定。政治學報,32,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Mahoney, James W.(2000)。Path Dependence in Historical Sociology。Theory and Society,29(4),507-548。  new window
25.Hawes, Gary(1989)。Aquino and Her Administration: A View from the Countryside。Pacific affairs,62(1),9-28。  new window
26.Thompson, Mark R.(1996)。Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Perspective。Comparative Politics,28(2),179-206。  new window
學位論文
1.Ando, Hirofumi(1971)。Election in the Philippines: Mass-elite Interaction through the Electoral Process, 1946-1969(博士論文)。University of Michigan。  new window
圖書
1.Shugart, Matthew Soberg、Carey, John M.、曾建元、羅培凌、何景榮、謝秉憲、陳景堯、王心儀(2002)。總統與國會:憲政設計與選舉動力。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Co, Edna E. A.、Tigno, Jorge V.、Lao, Maria Elissa Jayme、Sayo, Margarita A.(2005)。Philippine Democracy Assessment: Free and Fair Elections and the Democratic Role of Political Parties。Pasig City:Friedrich Ebert Stiftung。  new window
3.Kasuya, Yuko(2009)。Presidential Bandwagon: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines。Anvil Publishing, Inc.。  new window
4.Busto, Arellano V.(1997)。Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines。Manila:A. V. B. Printing Press。  new window
5.顧長永(2005)。東南亞政治學。臺北:巨流圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hicken, Allen(2009)。Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.劉聖中(2010)。歷史制度主義:制度變遷的比較歷史研究。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.North, Douglass C.、劉瑞華(1994)。制度、制度變遷與經濟成就。臺北:時報文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳鴻瑜(1980)。菲律賓的政治發展。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳鴻瑜(2003)。菲律賓史:東西文明交會的島國。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳鴻瑜(2006)。東南亞各國政府與政治。臺北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Duverger, Maurice(1963)。Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State。New York:Wiley。  new window
13.Liang, Dapen(1971)。Philippine Parties and Politics。San Francisco:The Gladstone Company。  new window
14.Skowronek, Stephen(1982)。Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administration。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Timberman, David G.(1991)。A Changeless Land: Continuity and Change in Philippines Politics。Singapore:ISEAS。  new window
16.Lijphart, Arend(1984)。Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries。Yale University Press。  new window
17.金應熙、劉迪輝(1990)。菲律賓史。河南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Majul, Cesar Adib(1996)。The Political and Constitutional Ideas of the Philippine Revolution。University of the Philippines Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.王業立、黃豪聖(2000)。選舉制度與政黨轉型:一個新制度論的分析架構。政治制度。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Thelen, Kathleen、Steinmo, Sven(1992)。Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics。Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Lande, Carl(1968)。Parties and Politics in the Philippines。Six Perspectives on the Philippines。Manila:Bookmark Inc.。  new window
4.Peters, B. Guy、Pierre, Jon(2007)。Concluding Discussion。Institutionalism。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE