此文主旨在探討戴君仁《易》學關懷主旨及其論述《易》學史問題所展現之主要思想內容。研究方法主要採用文獻考述分析法，以《戴靜山先生全集》中所收錄之《易》學著述為主要探討範圍，並透過比較歷代重要《易》學著述，並結合戴先生所處時代之學術思潮，進行探討。此文研究結果指出戴君仁是以儒學作為其學術基本關懷，重視經典啟迪人心義理思維的價值。戴君仁相當重視《易傳》，從格言訓戒及哲學義理兩個面向探討《易傳》的義理內涵。他並從三個層面探討歷代《易》學的發展，包括批判象數《易》學在今日已無學習價值。對於圖書之學，則是先貶斥其為象數支流，後又發現圖書學可從哲學範疇論析宋人宇宙本體等相關思想，從而重提其價值。戴君仁最重視儒理《易》學，批評王弼援《老》解《易》，推崇《伊川易傳》為最純正的儒理；並認為朱子能採求真的科學態度解《易》，接受圖書學派闡發其宇宙論思想。戴君仁之所以對《易》學史進行介紹論述，乃企圖從《易經》中找出符合西方科學及哲學思潮的概念。透過戴君仁的《易》學研究，可初步了解臺灣《易》學在儒學發展史中重新尋求之定位，也將啟發學者關注戰後臺灣重新關注儒學義理的現象，對於儒學史在臺灣的發展認識也有相當重要的幫助

This paper is mainly to explore Dai Jun Ren's thoughts of ＂The Book of Changes＂ through literature analysis. This paper takes ＂Dai Jing Shan Xian Shan Quan Ji＂ as the scope of discussion. The results indicate that Dai explained ＂The Book of Changes＂ by Confucainism, and paid attention on the morality to inspire people. He emphasized the maxims and philosophies to explore the thought of Yi-Chuan. Dai explored the academic history of ＂The Book of Changes＂. He was the most exclusive of image-number system and he thought it does not have the value of learning. He origninally also thought the Hetu Luoshu was one of image - number system, but later he changed his mind. He thought that the Hetu Luoshu was important because it contained ontological philosophical ideas. Dai emphasized on Confucianism, criticized Wang Bi, respceted Cheng Yi, and thought Zhu Xi could use scientific thinking to explain ＂The Book of Changes＂, and expounded cosmological thinking. Dai was influenced by Western thoughts and scientific thinking, Dai tried to find the meaning of modernization from the traditional academic thought. Through the study of Dai, we can initially understand the development of ＂The Book of Changes＂ in Taiwan