:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Utilizing External-Knowledge in Means-Ends Analysis: A Comparative Study on Taiwanese and U.S. Cases Regarding Interdisciplinary Approaches to Constitutional Reasoning
書刊名:National Taiwan University Law Review
作者:賈文宇 引用關係
作者(外文):Chia, Wen-yu
出版日期:2018
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁1-51
主題關鍵詞:憲法臺灣憲法法院科際整合法學法律務實主義比例原則Constitutional lawTaiwan Constitutional CourtInterdisciplinary approachesLegal realismProportionality test
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:177
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.Mathews, Jud、Sweet, Alec Stone(2011)。All Things in Proportion? American Rights Review and the Problem of Balancing。Emory Law Journal,60(4),797-876。  new window
2.Wise, Judith(1998)。Dissent and The Militant Democracy: The German Constitution and The Banning of The Free German Workers Party。University of Chicago Law School Roundtable,5,301-343。  new window
3.Krotoszynski, Ronald J. Jr.(2004)。A Comparative Perspective on The First Amendment: Free Speech, Militant Democracy, and The Primacy of Dignity as A Prefered Constitutional Value in Germany。Tulane Law Review,78,1549-1608。  new window
4.廖元豪(20080300)。高深莫測,抑或亂中有序?--論現任大法官在基本權利案件中的「審查基準」。中研院法學期刊,2,211-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃昭元(20130600)。大法官解釋審查標準之發展(1996~2011):比例原則的繼受與在地化。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,42(2),215-258。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王泰升(20111000)。四個世代形塑而成的戰後臺灣法學。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,40(特刊),1367-1428。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李建良(20131101)。拒絕酒測與吊銷駕照的合理關聯與正當程序--釋字第699號解釋。臺灣法學雜誌,235,29-43。  延伸查詢new window
8.Loewenstein, Karl(1937)。Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights。American Political Science Review,31(3),417-432。  new window
9.Schlink, Bernhard(2012)。Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere but Here?。Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law,22(2),291-302。  new window
10.邱文聰(20080600)。被忽略的(立法)事實:探詢實證科學在規範論證中的可能角色兼評釋字第584號解釋。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,37(2),233-284。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.賈文宇(20170300)。司法違憲審查中的證據品質與事理觀點--從證據法角度出發的美國經驗與臺灣借鏡。中研院法學期刊,20,251-308。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Jacson, Vicki C.(1999)。Ambivalent Resistance and Comparative Constitutionalism: Opening up the Conversation on 'Proportionality', Rights and Federalism。University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law,1,583-639。  new window
13.Posner, Richard A.(1986)。Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution。Case Western Reserve Law Review,37(2),179-217。  new window
14.Aleinikoff, T. A.(1987)。Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing。Yale Law Journal,96,943-1005。  new window
15.Bliwise, R. J.(20031001)。Re-Affirming Affirmative Action。Duke Magazine。  new window
16.Cantor, N.(2013)。From Grutter to Fisher and Beyond: The Compelling Interest of Diversity in Higher Education。University of San Francisco Law Review,48,261-272。  new window
17.Choudhry, S.(2006)。So What Is the Real Legacy of Oakes? Two Decades of Proportionality Analysis under the Canadian Charter's Section 1。Supreme Court Law Review,34,501-535。  new window
18.Englich, B.、Mussweiler, T.、Strack, F.(2006)。Playing Dice with Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts' Judicial Decision Making。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,32(2),188-200。  new window
19.Guthrie, C.、Rachlinski, J. J.、Wistrich, A. J.(2009)。The Hidden "Judiciary" : An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice。Duke Law Journal,58,1477-1530。  new window
20.Kahan, Dan M.(2011)。Foreword: Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognition, and Some Problems for Constitutional Law。Harvard Law Review,125,1-77。  new window
21.Levine, J. M.(2006)。Stigma's Opening: Grutter's Diversity Interest(s) and the New Calculus for Affirmative Action in Higher Education。California Law Review,94,457-530。  new window
22.Macklem, P.(2006)。Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination。International Journal of Constitutional Law,4,488-516。  new window
23.Nourse, V.、Shaffer, G.(2009)。Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?。Cornell Law Review,95,61-138。  new window
24.Rachlinski, J. J.、Wistrich, A. J.、Guthrie, C.(2015)。Can Judges Make Reliable Numeric Judgments? Distorted Damages and Skewed Sentences。Indiana Law Journal,90,695-739。  new window
25.Saunders, Cheryl(20091200)。Towards a Global Constitutional Gene Pool。National Taiwan University Law Review,4(3),1-38。new window  new window
26.Schauer, F.(2011)。Harm(s) and the First Amendment。Supreme Court Review,2011,81-111。  new window
27.Schauer, F.(2011)。Is Legality Political?。William & Mary Law Review,53,481-506。  new window
28.Tversky, Amos、Kahneman, Daniel(1974)。Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty。Science,185(4157),1124-1131。  new window
29.Law, David S.、Chang, Wen-Chen(2011)。The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue。Washington Law Review,86(3),523-577。  new window
30.Mody, Sanjay(2002)。Brown Footnote Eleven in Historical Context: Social Science and the Supreme Court's Quest for Legitimacy。Stanford Law Review,54,793-829。  new window
31.Singer, Joseph William(1988)。Legal Realism Now。California Law Review,76(2),467-544。  new window
圖書
1.吳庚、陳淳文(2013)。憲法理論與政府體制。臺北:吳庚。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Nonet, Philippe、Selznick, Philip(2001)。Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law。Transaction Publishers。  new window
3.Tamanaha, Brian Z.(2001)。A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、賀麟(1998)。小邏輯。台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Beecher-Monas, Erica(2007)。Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Schauer, Frederick(2009)。Thinking Like A Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning。Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Martin, Michael(1997)。Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian。New York, NY:Peter Lang Publishing, Inc。  new window
8.Currie, David P.(1994)。The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Chang, Wen-Chen、Thio, Li-ann、Tan, Kevin Y. L.、Yeh, Jiunn-rong(2014)。Constitutionalism in Asia: Cases and Materials。Hart Publishing。  new window
10.Jackson, Vicki C.、Tushnet, Mark(2006)。Comparative Constitutional Law。Foundation Press。  new window
11.de Been, W.(2008)。Legal Realism Regained: Saving Realism from Critical Acclaim。Stanford, CA:Stanford Law Books。  new window
12.Erickson, R. J.、Simon, R. J.(1998)。The Use of Social Science Data in Supreme Court Decisions。Champaign, IL:University of Illinois Press。  new window
13.Gilson, C. C.(2012)。The Law-Science Chasm: Bridging Law's Disaffection with Science as Evidence。New Orleans, LA:Quid Pro Books。  new window
14.Ginsburg, T.、Dixon, R.(2014)。Comparative Constitutional Law in Asia。Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing。  new window
15.Kommers, Donald P.、Miller, Russell A.(2012)。The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany。Duke University Press。  new window
16.Monahan, J.、Walker, L.(2009)。Social Science in Law: Cases and Materials。New York, NY:Foundation Press。  new window
17.Šušnjar, D.(2010)。Proportionality, Fundamental Rights, and Balance of Powers。Boston, MA:Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃舒芃(20090000)。憲法中的釋義學與科際整合--論台灣憲法學繼受典範的變遷。變遷社會中的法學方法。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃舒芃(20090000)。社會科學研究的民主意涵--美國法律唯實論的民主觀及其啟示。變遷社會中的法學方法。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃舒芃(20090000)。數字會說話?--從大法官釋字第五八四號解釋談事實認定在規範違憲審查中的地位。變遷社會中的法學方法。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE