:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教育政策形成及制定過程之分析
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:林天祐麌志長張志毓余瑞陽邱春堂楊士賢
作者(外文):Lin, Tien-yuYu, Jyh-charngChang, Chih-yuYu, Jui-yangChiou, Chuen TangYang, Shu-shan
出版日期:1996
卷期:5
頁次:頁1-40
主題關鍵詞:教育政策
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(5) 專書(3) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:106
教育政策形成及制定過程分析的內容,包括政策問題的形成、政策制定的主體、政策制定的過程、以及影響的因素等四個部份。政策問題的形成,經過公共需求的產生、形成政策性問題、以及進行政策討論三個階段,利益團體、政治領導人物、民意代表、行政人員、示威抗爭活動、具體的統計數據、以及政治結構的改變等,是影響政策問題形成的重要因素。政策制定的主體包括行政、立法、司法三個機構,此三機構主動或被動制定教育政策。教育政策的制定歷經確定問題、政策擬定、以及法制化三個階段,在政策制定過程中,某些人、相關政府單位、部分民間團體、時事輿論、以及特定的事件,交互影響政策的內容及方向。理論與實際資料分析顯示,教育政策的形成與制定,是一個「多元對立」、「動態消長」的過程,在此一複雜過程中,政策制定常有「緩不濟急」、「我決定,你負責」、以及「政治導向」的現象。「實質民主化」、 「過程透明化」、「決定理性化」,是形成及制定教育政策者未來努力的方向。
The formation and formulation processes of educational poli-cies were examined. The formation of policy problems, the policy formulators, the formulating processes, and the factors affecting and effecting policy formation and formulation were analyzed in details. The formation of policy problems involves three stages, including the emerge of public needs, the acceptance as policy problems, and the agenda-setting processes. Interest groups, pol-itical leadership, representatives, government administrators, protest activities, and statistical indicators are important factors which affect and effect the formation of policy issues. The formulators, including administrative agencies, legislative agencies, and judicial agencies, proactively and reactively for-mulate educational policies. The policy formulation follow three stages: identifying problems, formulating policy proposals, and legitimating policies. Specific people, government agencies, concerned organizations, communications media, and special events contribute to shaping the policy content and orientation. The analyses show that the formation and formulation of educational policy is a ambivalent and mutually interchanging process. Which results delayed. off-responsibility. and politically-dominated decisions. In the pursuit of substantial inputs from the masses. more open process for formulating policies. and rationalized de-cision- making is highly desired.
期刊論文
1.周燦德(1994)。影響教育決策的政治作為--法制化歷程初探。師鐸,10,8-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1995)。司法解釋。法令月刊,46(7)。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1995)。司法解釋。法令月刊,46(8)。  延伸查詢new window
4.Walker, J. L.(1977)。Setting the agenda in the United States Senate: A theory of problem selection。British Journal of Political Science,7,423-446。  new window
5.Woo, J. H.(1991)。Educational and economic growth in Taiwan: A case of successful planning。World Development,19(8),1029-1044。  new window
6.Lipsky, Michael(1968)。Protest as a Political Resource。The American Political Science Review,62(4),1144-1158。  new window
會議論文
1.林天祐(1995)。學校教師會與學校行政:競爭與合作?。現代教育論壇:教師組織定位與展望研討會。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dye, T. R.、Zeigler, H.(1993)。The irony of democracy。Monterey, California:Wadsworth Publishing Co.。  new window
2.Peters, B. G.(1993)。American public policy。Chatham, NJ:Chatham House。  new window
3.Patton, C. V.、Sawick, D. S.(1993)。Basic method of policy analysis and planning。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.張鈿富(1996)。教育政策分析。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Truman, David B.(1951)。The Governmental Process。New York:Knopf。  new window
6.Stevenson, H. W.、Stigler, J. W.(1992)。The learning gap。New York:Summit Book。  new window
7.Cobb, Roger W.、Elder, Charles D.(1983)。Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building。Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
8.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。行政院教育改革審議委員會第一期諮議報告量。臺北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.Almond, G. A.、Powell, G. B. Jr.(1966)。Comparative politics: A developmental approach。Boston, MA:Little, Brown。  new window
10.Anderson, J. E.(1994)。Public policymaking。Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
11.Anderson, J. E.、Brady, D. I.、Bullock, C.(1984)。Public policy and politics in the United States。Monterey, CA:Brooks/Coles。  new window
12.Eyestone, R.(1978)。From social issues to public policy。New York:Wiley。  new window
13.Light, Paul(1982)。The President's agenda。Baltimore, Maryland:John Hopkins University Press。  new window
14.Linksy, M.(1986)。Impact: How the press affects Federal policy making。New York:Norton。  new window
15.Nelson, B. J.(1984)。Making an issue of child abuses。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
16.Orlosky, D. E.、McCleary, L. E.、Shapiro, A.、Webb, L. D.(1984)。Educational administration today。Columbus, Ohio:Charles E. Merrill。  new window
17.Portney, K. E.(1906)。Approaching public policy analysis: An introduction to policy and program research。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
18.Sinclair, Barbara(1989)。The transformation of the U.S. Senate。Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
19.Dye, Thomas R.(1995)。Understanding Public Policy。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
20.謝文全(1984)。教育行政制度比較研究。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.馬驥傑(19960608)。教育任用條例第二十一條第二項違憲,大法官會議宣布失效。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Shapiro, Robert Y.、Jacobs, Lawrence R.(1989)。The relationship between public opinion and public policy: A review。Political behaviour annual。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
2.林天祐。學校家長關係。有效能的學校。臺北市:國立教育資料館。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Latham, E.(1956)。The group basis of politics。Political behavior。New York:Free Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE