:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:服飾與禮儀:〈離騷〉的服飾中心說
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:李豐楙 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Fong-mao
出版日期:1999
卷期:14
頁次:頁1-49
主題關鍵詞:服飾禮儀巫俗AttireRitualsShamanistic culture
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(3) 專書(7) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:121
     對於屈原<離騷>的研究,歷來已多注意衣飾的重要性,本篇則從《山海經》等說 明「服」、「初服」、「非世俗之所服」的服字用例,就是服飾、服佩的意義。而在各種香 草象徵服飾的藝術手法中,廣泛引用文獻及出土文物證明當時楚人的服佩習慣,確有被衣、 帶劍、佩珠及戴高冠的君子之服。屈原採用香草服飾隱喻其修習才德,在此提出凡經三變的 三階段說:即初服、成年入仕之服及昇天的巫者之服,分別象徵不同階段的禮儀及祭儀服飾 。並從文脈證明「好修」一詞為一篇的綱領,象徵屈原對於美與善的堅持。因此提出「不變 」為主題,用以對照「變」,本研究認為屈原使用香草的變質以隱喻小人的變節,這種諷諭 手法對於子蘭、子椒的諷刺,乃與當時楚國王室以香草命名的習慣有關。故綜合相關論證, ,嘗試從「常與非常」的服飾患維,提出《離騷》的服飾中心說。
     Previous study of Ch'u Yuan's "Li-sao" already recognized the significance of attire. This paper takes Shan-hai-ching and other sources as examples to explicate that fu, ch'u-fu and the unworldly fu all refer to men's attire. It has been proved by historical documents and archaeological artifacts that, among the various artistic techniques of symbolizing men's attire by fragrant grass, the Ch*u people in Ch'li Yuan's time did have the habit of wearing fine apparel, swords, precious stones and high top hats which represented the attire of a gentleman. To explain how Ch'u Yiian employed images of fragrant grass attire as metaphors for self-cultivation, this paper proposes a theory of three stages, or three changes, which are the novice's attire (ch'u-fu), the adult's official attire, and the shaman's attire of ascending to heaven, to symbolize attire for ritual ceremony and memorial ceremony in different stages. The author argues that the term "hao-hsiu" (refined cultivation) is the motif of "Li-sao" which symbolizes Ch'u Yuan's insistence on goodness and beauty. As a contrast to "change," "constancy" is indeed the theme of "Li-sao". The fact that Ch'li Yiian employed the changes of fragrant grass as a metaphor for inferior men's moral repentance, to satirize Tzu-lan and Tzu-chiao, is related to the tradition of naming of the Ch'u royal family with names of fragrant grass. By way of the "constancy" and "inconstancy" of the attire theory and other related arguments, the author concludes that attire is the core of "Li-sao."
期刊論文
1.李豐楙(19811200)。服飾、服食與巫俗傳說--從巫俗觀點對楚辭的考察之一。古典文學,3,71-99。  延伸查詢new window
2.李豐楙(1981)。「山海經」靈異動物之研究。中華學苑,24/25,1-25。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李豐楙(1994)。崑崙、登天與巫俗傳統。臺北:萬卷樓圖書。54-102。  延伸查詢new window
2.游國恩(1977)。楚辭女性中心說。臺北。191-202。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.龔詩文(1997)。中國早期植物紋飾研究(碩士論文)。台北藝術大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李豐楙(1978)。翁方綱及其詩論。臺北:嘉新水泥公司文化基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.高誘。呂氏春秋。臺北市:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.加藤秀俊、彭德中(1989)。餘暇社會學:探討大眾休閒生活的衍變與趨向。臺北:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.李大明(1994)。漢楚辭學史。成都。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃中模(1990)。現代楚辭批評史。武漢。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉向、向宗魯(1978)。說苑。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾布川寬(1981)。崑崙山への昇仙--古代中國人が描いた死後の世界。東京:中央公論社。  延伸查詢new window
8.宋公文、張君(1995)。楚國風俗志。武漢:湖北教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.李豐楙(1996)。憂與遊:六朝隋唐遊仙詩論集。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.湖北省博物館(1989)。曾侯乙墓。北京:文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.裴明相(1986)。楚人服飾考。楚文化覓蹤。鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
12.王夢鷗(1987)。從士大夫文學到貴遊文學。傳統文學論衡。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.金耀基(1993)。儒家學說中的個體與群體—一個關係角度的詮釋。中國社會與文化。香港。  延伸查詢new window
14.Heller, Agnes(1993)。日常生活。日常生活。重慶。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃中模(1990)。中日學者屈原問題論爭集。濟南:山東教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.何錡章(1976)。離騷考辨。離騷天問考辨。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.蕭兵(1990)。南國的巫覡文化與楚辭。楚辭文化。北京。  延伸查詢new window
18.藤野岩友(1951)。巫系文學論。巫系文學論。東京。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳夏生(1980)。中國結。中國結。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(東漢)王逸。楚辭章句。  延伸查詢new window
2.李豐楙(1997)。中國服飾文化的「常與非常」結構,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(戰國楚)屈原(1975)。楚辭,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.史記。  延伸查詢new window
5.韓非子。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wilhelm, Helmut、劉紉尼(1976)。學者的挫折感:論「賦」的一種型式。中國思想與制度論集。臺北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE