:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:比較研究與教育政策--實習教師制度及中小學教評會制度評析
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:王家通
作者(外文):Wang, Chia-tung
出版日期:1999
卷期:15
頁次:頁65-89
主題關鍵詞:比較研究教育政策實習教師教師評審委員會Comparative studyEducational policyStudent teacherCommittee of teacher appraisement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:186
     本文主要目的在於透過實習教師制度及中小學教評會制度的比較評析,說明在教 育政策的制定過程中,比較研究所佔的重要地位。   首先本文透過上述兩種制度的法令分析及實施現況的說明,以呈現這兩項制度的問題 所在及其不合理之處,然後針對這些問題及不合之處,將德、美、日、英等國的做法與我 國相互對照及比較討論,以瞭解我國的特殊性;再進一步從比較討論中,闡明我國制度之 所以產生問題的原因所在。   根據本文分析發現,我國師資培育雖然想模仿德國實施嚴格的兩階段資格檢定與實習 制度,但都缺乏德國制度的精神所在及教師中心等配套措施,以致實施結果只是有名無實 。至於另一個例子-教評會制度,卻完全無視於外國經驗,亦未仔細研究其可行性,即閉 門造車,冒然實施,以至於窒礙難行。   最後本文根據研究結果,提出三項建議:第一,乾脆取消現行實習教師制度而改採美 日兩國的初任教師研習制度;第二,修法重新規定教評會每年至少必須舉行一至二次的共 同招師制度,將過去的介聘精神納入其中;第三,今後新教育政策之擬定,必須先做深入 的比較研究,然後仔細規畫,並充分討論。
     The purpose of this article is to clarify the important position of comparative study in formulation and decision making of new educational policy, through critical comparative analysis of the systems of student teacher and teacher appraisement in this country.   At first, this article made a critical analysis of the regulations about above mentioned two systems, and pointed out their unreasonable articles. Then by the comparative study of the systems in Germany, United States, Japan and England, we have cleared the exceptional features in these two systems.   According to comparative analysis in this article, we discovered that although the teacher education in this country is devoted to imitate the German model, yet it lacks the spirit of German system and its necessary measures. For example, we have not enough teacher centers, as a sesult, it becomes only in name but not in eality. On the other hand, the system of teacher appraisement, has not noly completely disregarded of the experience in other countries, but also never made a careful study about its feasibility. So at last, it becomes difficult to put into practice effectively.   At last, on the basis of this study, the researcher suggests three recommenda- tions:1.to give up the German model of student teacher system, and to adopt the USA and Japanese beginning teacher's inservice-study system; 2.to revise the regulations, and stipulate that the committee of teacher appraisement must at least have two times of the combined recruit of teachers every year; 3.in future, before the decision making of new educationall policy, it must have a careful comparative study with other countries.
期刊論文
1.王家通(1992)。教師工作權未能保障的原因在那裡。師說,47。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡清華(1998)。美國中小學教師聘約內涵之評述。我們的教育,7。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(1997)。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Leonard, Martin(1988)。The 1988 Education Act: A tactical guide for schools。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
2.王家通(1987)。比較教育學導論。高雄市:復文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Parkay, F. W.(1995)。Becoming a Teacher。Boston, Mass:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
4.日本國立教育研究所(1980)。教師教育の現狀と改革。  延伸查詢new window
5.李園會(1988)。初任者研修制度之研究。台北:台灣書房。  延伸查詢new window
6.兼子仁(1995)。教育小六法。東京:學陽書房。  延伸查詢new window
7.高木英明(1993)。比較教育行政試論。東京:行路社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Leighton, P.(1992)。Schools and Employment Law。London:Cassell。  new window
9.Ornstein, Allan C.、Lunenburg, Frederick C.(1991)。Educational Administration: Concepts and Practices。Belmont, California:Wadsworth Publishing Company。  new window
單篇論文
1.吳京(1998)。一月五日在立法院教育委員會報告文。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.歐用生(1994)。日本的實習教師制度。各國實習教育制度比較。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.王家通(1996)。我國師資培育制度的比較教育學分析。師資培育的新課題。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.牧昌見(1990)。初任者研修制度。教職研修總合特集 No. 64:初任者研修讀本。東京:教育開發研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.湯維玲(1994)。美國實習教師制度。各國實習教師制度之比較。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊深坑(1994)。德國實習教師制度。各國實習教師制度之比較。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bolam, R.(1987)。Induction of Beginning Teachers。The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education。Pergamon Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE