:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:性別教育機會均等的分析、檢討與實踐
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:林生傳
作者(外文):Lin, Sheng-chuan
出版日期:1999
卷期:15
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:性別性別角色兩性教育機會均等兩性平等兩性平權教育SexGenderSex equitySex roleEducational opportunitySex-free educationSex-equity education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:150
  • 點閱點閱:264
     本文主旨在分析性別教育機會均等的理念,檢討我國性別教育機會均等的實況, 並據以建構兩性平權教育以求實踐。首先,釐清性別的社會學概念,並追溯性別教育機會 不均等的源由。其次,論述教育機會均等的真諦,據以檢視我國性別教育機會的實際情況 ,分別依入學機會、結果及教育歷程逐予評析,探討性別教育機會不均等的原因與癥結。 最後,建構兩性平權教育並提出如何促進兩性教育機會均等作結。   「性別」教育機會均等的性別是一種社會建構,也是一種文化專斷,在社會結構中影 響教育的機會。性別的教育機會均等應由入學機會、教育的結果,尤須由教育歷程來檢視 。我國性別教育機會均等,由入學機會來分析,數量上比較,大體上男女已經相當地接近 ,惟由就讀科系的性別結構組成,則仍存有相當大的差距與明顯的階層化。從教育歷程來 檢視,無論家庭教育、社會教育與學校教育均可發現有許多不平等的事實與問題。因此, 兩性平權的教育必須能發揮:(一)發展的功能;(二)統整的功能;(三)平等的功能 。實踐兩性平權的學校教育則應把握下列要略:第一、設計兩性平權的課程;第二、慎選 教科書,活用教科書;第三、創新有效的教學方法與策略,增進兩性間的良性互動;第四 、利用學校的社會化,健全性別角色的發展;第五、建立推行兩性平權教育的機制;第六 、形成兩性平權的文化環境。
     This paper was aimed to conceptualize "gender" and "gender educational opportunity", to investigate the current status of gender educational opportunity, and to formulate a sex equity education for implementation. Firstly, assuming "sex" as a biological concept, while "gender" as a sociological construct. Gender construct was originally formulated in the agricultural society with a firm ground of functional appropriateness. As society evolved along as economic activity progressed, gender construct did not change accordingly and still stayed in its original point, thus causes a "cultural lag" and results in an inequality of education biased against the female. Secondarily, with formulation on educational opportunity equality as the criteria against which population composition by sex in different school levels was examined carefully. Since education expansion has been proceeding so fast over past half century that gender inequality to access to schools in the primary level and the secondary level is not a question of concern. Even in the third level, gender inequality in quantity is much diminished and doesn't post as a serious problem at all. However, gender segregation and stratification nevertheless remains there in the disproportional distribution by sex in areas of technological engineering, and medical science, etc. also at the master and doctorate programs which lead to higher-paid jobs.   Further, this problem of sex segregation and stratification never occurs in chance, rather it is a consequence of the educational process including socialization in the family, as well as in society at large, especially in the schooling. During which the female receives less attention, less encouragement, less reinforcement, less reward, and less resource. Based on this study, for realizing the female's potentiality actualization, it is concluded and recommended that during the schooling process:(1) to reconstruct curriculum and textbooks with elimination of the gender-biased knowledge and content; (2) to reform the promotion system for desegregating gender discrimination; (3) to improve teaching methods and strategies to facilitate constructive M-F interactions; (4) to manage well the school and the class as a social system for sex socialization appropriately and effectively which benefits both the female and the male; (5) to establish a system for enforcing gender-equity education policy; (6) to create a cultural milieu to support gender equity education.
期刊論文
1.Stromquist, N. P.(1993)。Sex-equity legislation in Education: the State as promoter of women's rights。Review of Educational Research,63(4),379-407。  new window
2.Mael, F. A.(1998)。Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic development。Review of Educational Research,68(2),101-129。  new window
3.Morrison, T. L.(1979)。Classroom structure, work involvement, and social climate in elementary school classrooms。Journal of Educational Psychology,71,471-477。  new window
4.Feingold, A.(1992)。Sex Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A New Look at an Old Controversy。Review of Educational Research,62(1),61-84。  new window
5.American Association of University Women(1992)。How schools short change girls. Sex-equity legislation in education。Review of Educational Research,63(4),379-407。  new window
6.Burns, A.、Homel, R.(1989)。Gender division of tasks by parents and their children。Psychology of Women Quarterly,13,113-125。  new window
7.Ebbeck, M.(1984)。Equity for boys and girls。Early childhood Development and Care,18(1/2),119-131。  new window
8.Perkins, D. N.、Simmons, R.(1988)。Patterns of Misunderstanding: An Integrative Model for Science, Math, and Programming。Review of Educational Research,58(3),303-326。  new window
9.Simpson, A. W.、Erickson, M. T.(1983)。Teacher's verbal and non-verbal communication patterns as a function of teacher race, student gender, and student race。American Educational Research Journal,20(2),183-198。  new window
10.莊明貞、林碧雲(1997)。國小社會科新課程性別角色偏見之分析--以第一、二冊為例。國民教育,38(1),7-20。  延伸查詢new window
11.Jones, M. G.、Wheatley, J.(1990)。Gender differences in teacher-students interactions in science classroom。Journal of Research in science Teaching,27(9),861-874。  new window
12.Levin, H. M.(1976)。Educational opportunity and Social inequality in Western Europe。Social Problems,24,148-172。  new window
13.Parsons, T.(1959)。The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American society。Harvard Educational Review,29(4),297-313。  new window
14.Pomerleau, A.、Bolduc, D.、Malcuit, G.、Cossette, L.(1990)。Pink or Blue: Environmental Gender Stereotypes in the First Two Years of Life。Sex Roles,22(5),359-367。  new window
15.Stromquist, Nelly P.(1989)。Determinants of Educational Participation and Achievement of Women in the Third World: A Review of the Evidence and a Theoretical Critique。Review of Educational Research,59(2),143-183。  new window
16.張春興、陳李綢(19770600)。國小男女生學業成績的性別差異與其教師性別差異的關係。教育心理學報,10,21-33。  延伸查詢new window
17.謝小芩(19920700)。性別與教育機會--以二所北市國中為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊(人文及社會科學),2(2),179-201。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃毅志(19900300)。臺灣地區教育機會之不平等性。思與言,28(1),93-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.歐用生(19851200)。我國國民小學社會科教科書意識型態之分析。新竹師專學報,12,91-125。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.莊明貞、林碧雲(19970621)。檢視國小社會科新版教科書性別角色之偏見。「新興課程領域一兩性教育」研討會,臺灣師範大學教育研究中心(舉辦) (會議日期: 1997/06/21)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳嘉麗(1997)。從性別角度看國中數理化教科書。性別與科學教育學術研討會。台北:國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林生傳(1998)。兩性平等教育教師應扮演的角色。中小學校兩性平等教育學術研討會,教育部主辦 (會議日期: 1998,5,25-27)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.方德隆(199805)。多元文化教育中性別意識之內涵。全國高中職教師兩性平等教育墾丁工作坊,教育部兩性平等教育委員會,高雄醫學院兩性研究中心 (會議日期: 1998,5),3-14。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Splauding, B. L.(1963)。Achievement creativity, and self-concept correlates of teacher-pupil transactions。Washington, DC:Office of education。  new window
2.教育部(1998)。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝臥龍、駱慧文、莊勝發(1995)。從課堂師生互動關係分析的觀點來探討學前兒童性別角色發展之研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊勝義(1989)。臺灣地區高級中等教育機會均等問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dreeben, R.(1968)。On What is Learned in School。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
2.Cockburn, C.(1991)。In the Way of Women - Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations。London, UK。  new window
3.Sadker, D. M.、Sadker, M. P.(1982)。Sex equity Handbook for schools。New York, NY:Longman。  new window
4.Anderson, C. A.(1967)。Theoretical Consideration in Educational Inequality。Urbana:University of Illinois Press。  new window
5.Grayson, D.(1987)。Gender-ethnic expectations and student expectations. A summary of the areas of disparity。Earlbam. IA:Graymail Foundation。  new window
6.Meehan, E.、Sevenhuijsen, S.(1991)。Equality Politics and Gender。NY:Sage Publication Ltd.。  new window
7.Meyer, W.、Lindstrom, D.(1969)。The distribution of teacher approved and disapproved of Head Start Children。Washington, D. C.:Office of Economic Opportunity。  new window
8.Miller, L. P.、Gordon, E. W.(1974)。Equality of Educational Opportunity。NY:AMS Press。  new window
9.Sadker, M. P.、Sadker, D. M.(1982)。Teachers, schools, and society 2nd ed。NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.Slavin, R. E.(1989)。School and Classroom Organization。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pub.。  new window
11.Tavris, Carol、Offir, Carole(1977)。The Longest War-Sex Differences in Perspective。NY:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.。  new window
12.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard、Bottomore, Tom(1977)。Reproduction in education, society and culture。Sage。  new window
13.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Equality and Achievement in Education。Westview Press。  new window
14.Gilbert, Lucia Albino(1993)。Two Careers/One Family: The Promise of Gender Equality。Newbury Park:London:New Delhi:Sage。  new window
15.Joyce, B.、Weil, M.(1996)。Models of Teaching。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
16.Klein, S. S.(1985)。Handbook for achieving sex equality through education。Baltimore:London:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
17.McCormick, T. M.(1994)。Creating the nonsexist classroom. A multiple approach。NY:Teachers College, Columbia Univ. Press。  new window
18.Streitmatter, Janice(1994)。Toward gender equity in the classroom。New York, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
19.Walby, Sylvia(1988)。Gender Segregation at Work。Philadelphia:NY:Open University Press。  new window
20.李元貞(1993)。體檢國小教科書--主題體檢:兩性觀。臺北市:臺灣教授協會。  延伸查詢new window
21.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。第三期諮議報告書。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
22.黃政傑(1988)。教育理想的追求。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.林生傳(19880000)。新教學理論與策略:自由開放社會中的個別化教學與後個別化教學。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Weber, Max、Gerth, Hans Heinrich、Mills, C. Wright(1946)。From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology。Oxford University Press。  new window
25.Bowles, Samuel、Gintis, Herbert(1976)。Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life。New York:Basic Books。  new window
其他
1.謝臥龍(19961101)。由教師發問的模式與技巧探討國中自然學科課堂中師生互動的性別偏見(國科會研究成果發表會)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sikes, J. N.(1972)。Differential behaviors of male and female teachers with male and female students。  new window
圖書論文
1.江芳盛(1997)。男女合校與教育機會均等的研究與啟示--以美國為例。社會變遷中的教育機會均等。台北:揚智。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.American Association of University Women(1993)。How schools short change girls。Sex-equity legislation in education。Washington, DC.。  new window
3.Anastasi, A.(1973)。Common fallacies about heredity, environment and human behavior。Handbook for achieving sex equity through education。Iowa City:Baltimore, Maryland:American College Testing Program。  new window
4.Diamond, Esther E.、Tittle, Carol Kehr(1985)。Sex equity in testing。Handbook for achieving sex-equity through education。Johns Hopkins Univ. Press。  new window
5.Kaminski, D.(1985)。Where are the female Einstein? The Gender Stratification of Math and Science。Schools and Society。Palo Alto:London:Mayfield Pub. Co.。  new window
6.Meyer, W.、Thompson, G.(1956)。Teacher interactions with boys as contrasted with girls。Psychological Studies of human development。NY:Appleton-Century Crafts。  new window
7.Moore, H. L.(1994)。Understanding Sex and Gender。Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology。London:Routledge。  new window
8.Stockard, J.(1980)。Why sex inequalities exist for students?。Sex in education。  new window
9.Williams, P.(1980)。Laws prohibiting sex discrimination in the schools。Sex equity in education。NY:Academic Press。  new window
10.林芳玫(1996)。媒體陽謀論--專業主義精英文化與商業力量對女性的三重歧視。兩性文化&社會。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE