:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:非核家園的民眾意向:網路輿論的大數據分析
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:殷志偉劉正
作者(外文):Ying, Chee WeiLiu, Jeng
出版日期:2020
卷期:27:2
頁次:頁49-92
主題關鍵詞:蔡英文民進黨以核養綠政治情緒Tsai Ing-wenDemocratic Progressive PartyGo green with nuclearPolitical emotion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:76
  • 點閱點閱:5
期刊論文
1.Marcus, George E.、Mackuen, Michael B.(1993)。Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns。American Political Science Review,87(3),672-685。  new window
2.徐火炎(20041100)。臺灣結、中國結與臺灣心、中國情:臺灣選舉中的符號政治。選舉研究,11(2),1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ho, Ming-sho(2014)。The fukushima effect: Explaining the resurgence of the anti-nuclear movement in Taiwan。Environmental Politics,23(6),965-983。  new window
4.陳憶寧(20141200)。福島危機中臺灣民眾對核能的風險感知與態度:政黨傾向、核能知識、信任與科學傳播的角色。中華傳播學刊,26,223-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳陸輝、陳映男(20161100)。政治情緒對兩岸經貿交流的影響:以臺灣的大學生為例。選舉研究,23(2),55-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉嘉薇(20170300)。網路統獨的聲量研究:大數據的分析。政治科學論叢,71,113-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Shih, Fang-Long(2012)。Generating power in Taiwan: Nuclear, political and religious power。Culture and Religion,13(3),295-313。  new window
8.陳雅玫(20161200)。學生臉書使用與政治參與:以太陽花學運為例。中國行政評論,22(4),61-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.顧以謙、劉邦揚(20181200)。檢察機關網路聲量與情緒分析--大數據分析。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊,19,22-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳陸輝(20181100)。情緒政治與2016年總統選舉。選舉研究,25(2),31-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.江彥生、陳昇瑋(20161200)。簡介「計算社會學」:一個結合電腦與數位科技的新興社會學研究。臺灣社會學,32,171-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李冠成(20200300)。政治情緒與選舉參與:2012年和2016年臺灣總統選舉的經驗分析。人文及社會科學集刊,32(1),81-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.劉振隆、郭庭瑜、黃湋宸、蔡佳潔(20180800)。以社群大數據為基礎之臺灣民眾國外旅遊概況與觀光行為模式。觀光與休閒管理期刊,6(特刊),13-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉振隆、張愷珉、吳芷軒、于采玉、李彥君、黃鈺珊(20180800)。政府資料開放平臺之PM2.5即時監測資料分析。管理資訊計算,7(特刊1),1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Ansolabehere, Stephen、Hersh, Eitan(2012)。Validation: What Big Data Reveal about Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate。Political Analysis,20(4),437-459。  new window
16.Barber, Michael、Pope, Jeremy(2018)。Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America。American Political Science Review,113(1),38-54。  new window
17.Ince, Jelani、Rojas, Fabio、Davis, Clayton(2017)。The Social Media response to Black Lives Matter: How Twitter Users Interact with Black Lives Matter through Hashtag Use。Ethnic and Racial Studies,40(11),1814-1830。  new window
18.Jobin, Paul(2018)。Some 40 Years to Clean Up Fukushima: A View from Ongoing Court Battles。Georgetown Journal of Asian Affairs,4(2),73-81。  new window
19.Keller, Michelle、Park, Hannah J.、Cunningham, Maria、Fouladian, Joshua、Chen, Michelle、Spiegel, Brennan M. R.(2017)。Public Perceptions Regarding Use of Virtual Reality in Health Care: A Social Media Content Analysis Using Facebook。Journal of Medical Internet Research,19(12),1-12。  new window
20.Sears, David O.、Funk, Carolyn L.(1991)。The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,24,1-91。  new window
21.Markandya, Anil、Paul, Wilkinson(2007)。Electricity Generation and Health。Lancet,370,979-990。  new window
22.Pomputius, Ariel(2019)。Can You Hear Me Now? Social Listening as a Strategy for Understanding User Needs。Medical Reference Services Quarterly,38(2),181-186。  new window
23.Shyu, Huoyan(2008)。Populism in Taiwan: The Rise of a Populist-Democratic Culture in a Democratising Society。Asian Journal of Political Science,16(2),130-150。  new window
24.Wang, Feng、Mack, Elizabeth、Maciewjewski, Ross(2017)。Analyzing Entrepreneurial Social Networks with Big Data。Annals of the American Association of Geographers,107(1),130-150。  new window
25.King, Gary、Pan, Jennifer、Roberts, Margaret E.(2013)。How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression。American Political Science Review,107(2),326-343。  new window
26.劉嘉薇(20141200)。民眾政黨認同、媒介選擇與紅衫軍政治運動參與。政治學報,58,101-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.何季倫、鄭宇庭(20181200)。透過社群輿情分析探討餐飲類口碑操作方式--以咖啡廳產業為例。數據分析,13(6),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.蕭乃沂、陳敦源、廖洲棚、楊立偉、呂俊宏(2015)。政府應用巨量資料精進公共服務與政策分析之可行性研究 (計畫編號:NDC-MIS-103-003)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Madsbjerg, Christian(2017)。Sensemaking: The power of the humanities in the age of the algorithm。New York, NY:Hachette Books。  new window
2.周桂田(2017)。氣候變遷社會學--高碳社會及其轉型挑戰。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Salganik, Matthew J.(2018)。Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age。Princeton University Press。  new window
4.馬英九基金會、長風基金會(2019)。以核養綠:台灣能源新願景。新北市:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Ansolabehere, Stephen、Konisky, David(2014)。Cheap and Clean--How Americans Think about Energy in the Age of Global Warming。London:MIT Pres。  new window
其他
1.何明修(2018)。拋棄民意直球對決的迷思:公投選舉後的省思,https://www.voicettank.org/single-post/2018/11/28/mass-movement-and-referendum。  延伸查詢new window
2.林宗弘(2018)。攸關利益!年改與農業韓流是民進黨敗選的最重要原因,https://twstreetcorner.org/2018/11/29/linthunghong-5/。  延伸查詢new window
3.王宏恩(2018)。用主成分分析綜觀十個公投案,voicettank.org/single-post/2018/11/29/referendums-data-PCA。  延伸查詢new window
4.林婷嫻,張語辰(2018)。斷開中文的鎖鍊!自然語言處理(NLP),https://research.sinica.edu.tw/nlp-natural-language-processing-chinese-knowledge-information/。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃益中(2018)。低電價、低綠能:非核家園只能「用肺發電」?,opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/8143/3181289。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡卉荀,李翰林(2018)。不用核電=空污增加?破解迷思Q&A,cet-taiwan.org/publication/issue/content/3277。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡中岳(2018)。擁核可以 但不要造謠,e-info.org.tw/node/212858。  延伸查詢new window
8.IPCC(1995)。IPCC Second Assessment Climate Change 1995,ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/06/2nd-assessment-en.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.趙家緯(20180000)。邁向轉型時代--破除「以煤易核」、「犧牲生態」與「成本昂貴」的三重迷思。轉給你看:開啟臺灣能源轉型。臺北:秀威資訊。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Clarke, Lee(2010)。The Nuclear Option。Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Sutter, Robert、Yao, Alvin Yuan-Ming(2016)。Taiwan: Commitment to a Nuclear-Free Future。Nuclear Debates in Asia: The Role of Geopolitics and Domestic Processes。Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE