臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：集團企業及其分子公司之績效：台灣的實證研究
作者：陳建男 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chien-Nan Chen
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：商學研究所
指導教授：朱文儀
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2008
主題關鍵詞：集團企業；集團子公司；集團效應；績效；新興經濟體；business group；group-affiliated company；group effects；performance；emerging economy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
台灣自1980年代末期以來，經濟上大幅自由開放的結果，造就了大型集團企業的快速成長，集團企業在台灣經濟中的地位也日益重要。這不僅是台灣地區的特殊現象，在許多以經濟自由化、政治民主化作為成長引擎的新興經濟體中，集團企業往往被視為是新興國家經濟發展動力的主要來源，主導著經濟活動的發展。因此，近年來，關於新興經濟體中集團企業的績效表現受到許多學者的關注，已成了策略管理研究中重要的研究議題之一。
本論文藉由三個實證研究，以三個不同的途徑來檢視台灣地區的集團企業及其分子公司的績效表現。第一個研究著重於分析「集團層次」的績效，關注集團企業的結構特徵與集團績效之間的關係。研究結果顯示，在台灣，集團企業的資源集中度對於集團獲利能力有正向顯著的影響；而高度多角化的集團企業其獲利能力有比低度多角化的集團企業來得要低的傾向。
第二個研究著重於不同組織形式之企業經營績效的比較。研究結果顯示，在台灣，隸屬集團之企業，其獲利能力明顯高於非隸屬集團之獨立企業；集團整體的規模成長明顯高於非隸屬集團之獨立企業，而集團整體的償債能力明顯低於非隸屬集團之獨立企業。表示除了獲利能力之外，集團企業在規模擴張以及財務綜效的發揮上都相當明顯。但集團的管理有其難度，研究結果顯示，集團整體的效率不若核心公司以及非隸屬集團之獨立企業。
第三個研究則針對集團企業當中的子公司績效進行探討。研究結果顯示，子公司所屬集團所能提供的無形資源愈多、擁有的財務資源愈豐富，則子公司的績效表現愈佳；子公司本身所擁有的財務資源愈豐富，則子公司的績效表現愈佳；集團內地位愈高的子公司，績效表現愈佳；而集團成員之間的商品交易，對於子公司績效亦有正向的影響。表示集團效應對於集團成員有正向的影響作用，且集團的內部產品市場具某種程度的效率性。
結合以上實證結果，我們可以了解台灣地區集團企業及其分子公司的經營績效和相關影響因素。整體而言，在本研究的分析期間，台灣地區的制度系絡，是適於集團企業的生存與發展的。
Since the late 1980s, associated with the significant economic liberalization and privatization, large business groups in Taiwan grow fast and play a dominant role in Taiwan’s economy. Business groups are often seen as the main driver of economic development in many developing economies such as Korea, India, Chile, and so on. They dominate the development of economic activities. Therefore, in recent years, the performance of diversified business groups in emerging economies gained increased attention in academy research, and has became a central research topic in management literatures.
The thesis examined the performance of bussiness groups and group-affiliated companies in Taiwan by conducting three empirical studies with related but different focuses. Study 1 focuses on the group-level performance, to investigate the relationship between the structural chacteristics and performance of business group. The empirical results suggest that resource concentration is positively associated with group profitability. In addition, highly diversified business groups perform worse than limited diverisifiers.
Study 2 focuses on the performance comparison between different organization forms. The empirical results show that the profitability of firms affiliated with business groups is significantly higher than that of independent, non-group-affiliates. Meanwhile, business groups and group-affiliates both show a significantly higher level of growth in size, and a higher level of lending capacities than non-affiliates. In addition to profitability, it is also found that business groups do demonstrate expansion capability and financial synergies. However, they also have low operating efficiency, implying that managing business groups is more difficult than managing independent firms.
Study 3 examines the performance of group-affiliated companies. We found that, when business groups own more intangible and financial resources, the better the performance of the group-affiliated companies. Similarly, at the affiliate-level, those affiliated companies that own more financial resources significantly outperform those affiliates with limited financial resources. In terms of status, it is found that group members with higher status within a group outperform those with lower status. In addition, internal transactions within a group are positively associated with group-affiliates’ performance. All these imply the existence of a positive group-effect and an efficient internal product market among Taiwanese business groups.
Given all the empirical results of the above, this dissertation aims to provide us a picture on the performance and related antecedence factors of business group and group-affiliated companies in Taiwan. Overall, Taiwan’s institutional contex is suitable for the survival and development of business groups during our analysis period.
于宗先與王金利，2003，一隻看得見的手，聯經：台北。
中華徵信所，2004，台灣地區集團企業研究，中華徵信所，台北。
中華徵信所，2005，台灣地區集團企業研究，中華徵信所，台北。
中華徵信所，2006，台灣地區集團企業研究，中華徵信所，台北。
中華徵信所，2007，台灣地區集團企業研究，中華徵信所，台北。
王元章，2001，內部人持股、風險、股利、負債、投資與公司價值，證券市場發展季刊，13卷3期，頁26-69。new window
田弘茂、李存修、林建甫、葉銀華與王文宇，2000，上市(櫃)公司發生財務危機之案例分析與因應措施之研究，台灣證券交易所委託專案。
安士敦與瞿宛文，2003，超越後進發展：台灣的產業升級策略，聯經：台北。
吳坤明，2004，財務報表可信嗎？加速推動半年度合併報表，管理雜誌，第361期，頁52-56。
周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏，1996，家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究，中國財務學刊，4卷第1期，頁115-139。
邱皓政，2005，量化研究法(二)：統計原理與分析技術，台北：雙葉。
洪世章與陳忠賢，2000，台灣企業集團的發展是漸趨同形嗎？臺大管理論叢，11卷1期，頁73-101。
洪榮華、陳香如與林慧珍，2007，公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及公司績效之影響－研發密集產業之實證，中山管理評論，15卷1期，頁37-60。new window
商訊文化，2006，大陸台商1000大，臺北：商訊文化。
喬友慶、于卓民與林月雲，2001，國際化程度與產品差異化能力對廠商績效之影響－台灣大型製造廠商之實證研究，管理學報，19卷5期，頁811-842。new window
經濟部統計處，1998，企業多角化調查報告，經濟部統計處編印，台北。
葉銀華，2004，透視上市公司－聰明選股，遠離地雷，台北：先覺出版。
葉銀華、許培基、王健安與李佩恩，2003，台灣集團企業治理機制之研究，行政院經濟建設委員會委託專案。
葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩，2002，公司治理與評等系統，台北：商智文化。
劉正田，2002，無形資產、成長機會與股票報酬關係之研究，會計評論，35期，頁1-29。new window
瞿宛文與洪嘉瑜，2002，自由化與企業集團化的趨勢，台灣社會研究季刊，47期，頁33-83。
蘇怡如，2002，台灣集團企業多角化程度之探討，成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
Amit, R., & Livant, J. 1988. Diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1): 154-166.
Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Arnold, D. J., & Quelch J. A. 1998. New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1): 7-20.
Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231-1241.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Barney, J. B. 2002. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage.Pearson Education.
Berger, P., & Ofek, E. 1995. Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1): 39-65.
Bettis, R. A., & Hall, W. K. 1982. Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk, and accounting determined return. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2): 254-264.
Bettis, R. A., & Mahajan, V. 1985. Risk return performance of diversified firms, Management Science, 31(7): 785-799.
Brush, T.M., Bromiley, P., & Hendrickx, M., 2000. The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 455-472.
Campbell, A., Goold, M., & Alexander, M. 1995. Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Business Review, 73(2): 120-132.
Caves, R. E., 1981. Diversification and seller concentration: Evidence from change, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(2): 289-293.
Chakrabarti, A., Singh, K., & Mahmood, I. 2007. Diversification and performance: evidence from East Asian firms. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2): 101-120.
Chandler, A. D. 1962, Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprises, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chandler, A. D. 1990. Scale and Scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Chang, S. J. 2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 238-253.
Chang, S. J., & Choi, U. 1988. Strategy structure and performance of Korean business group. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2): 141-158.
Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 429-448.
Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. 2002. How much does the business group matter in Korea? Strategic Management Journal, 23: 265-274.
Chang, Y., & Thomas, H. 1989. The impact of diversification strategy on risk-return performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3): 271-284.
Chatterjee, S. B. 1986. Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2): 119-139.
Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. 1991. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 33-48.
Choi, J. P., & Cowing, T. G. 1999. Firm behavior and group affiliation: The strategic role of corporate grouping for Koren firms. Journal of Asian Economics, 10(2): 195-209.
Choi, J. P., & Cowing, T. G. 2002. Diversification, concentration and economic performance: Korean business groups. Review of Industrial Organization, 21(3): 271-282.
Chu, W. 1999. The changing pattern of diversification strategy of business groups in Taiwan. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, International Issue: 689-712.
Chu, W. 2004. Are group-affiliated firms really more profitable than nonaffiliated? Small Business Economics, 22(5): 391-405.
Chung, C. N. 2004. Institutional transition and cultural inheritance: Network ownership and corporate control of business groups in Taiwan, 1970s–1990s. International Sociology, 19(1): 25-50.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000a. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics, 58: 81-112.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000b. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2741-2771.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(4): 386-405.
D'' Aveni, R., & Ravenscraft, D. 1994. Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance? Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1167-1206.
Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Rasheed, A. M. A. 1991. Diversification and performance: Critical review and future directions. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5): 529-558.
Dawar, N., & Frost, T. 1999. Competing with giants: Survival strategies for local companies in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(2): 119-129.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8): 711-727.
Dess, G. G., Gupta, A., Hennart, J. F., & Hill, C. W. L. 1995. Conducting and integrating strategy research at the international, corporate, and business levels: Issues and directions. Journal of Management, 21(3): 357-393.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160.
Dubofsky, P., & Varadarajan, P. 1987. Diversification and measures of performance: Additional empirical evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3): 597-608.
Dundas K. N. M., & Richardson P. R. 1980. Corporate strategy and the concept of market failure. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2): 177-188.
Dundas K. N. M., & Richardson P. R. 1982. Implementing the unrelated product strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4): 287-301.
Dunne, P., & Hughes, A., 1994. Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s, Journal of Industrial of Economics, 42(2): 115-140.
Eisenhardt, K., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
Eisenhardt, K., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
Eisenhardt, M. K., & Martin, A. J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 1105-1121.
Encarnation, D. 1989. Dislodging multinationals: In¬dia''s comparative perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Fauver, L., Houston, J., & Naranjo, A. 2003. Capital market development, international integration, legal systems, and the value of corporate diversification: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1): 135-157.
Geiger, S. W., & Hoffman, J. J. 1998. The impact of the regulatory environment and corporate level diversification on firm performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(4): 439-453.
Gertner, R. H., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. 1994. Internal versus external capital markets, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 1211-1230.
Gill, S. 1999. The pathology of corruption. New Delhi: Harper/Collins.
Govindarajan, V. 1988. A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4): 828-853.
Granovetter, M. 1994. Business groups. In Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage, 453-75.
Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P. & Thomas, H. 1988. Diversity, diversification and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972-84. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4): 771-801.
Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Guillén, M. F., 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view, Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 362-380.
Gunduz, L., & Tatoglu, E. 2003. A comparison of the financial characteristics of group affiliated and independent firms in Turkey. European Business Review, 15(1): 48-54.
Gupta, A. K., 1987. SBU strategies, corporate-SBU relations, and SBU effectiveness in strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3): 477-500.
Hawawini G., Subramanian, V., & Verdin, P. 2003. Is performance driven by industry- or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 24(1):1-16.
Hill, C. W. L. 1995, Diversification and economic performance: Bring structure and corporate management back into the picture. In Rumelt, R., Schendel D., and Teece, D. (Eds), Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Harvard Business School Press, 297-321.
Hill, C. W. L., Hitt, M. A. & Hoskisson, R. E. 1992. Cooperative versus competitive structure in related and unrelated firms. Organization Science, 3(4): 501-521.
Hoskisson, R. E. 1987. Multidivisional structure and performance: The contingency of diversification strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4): 625-644.
Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. 1990. Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: A review and critique of theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management, 16 (2): 461-509.
Hoskisson, R. E., & Turk, T. 1990. Corporate restructuring: Governance and control limits of the internal capital market. Academy of Management Review, 15(3): 459-477.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 249-267.
Jacquemin, A. P. & Berry, C. H. 1979. Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4): 359-369.
Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2): 323-329.
Keister, L. A. 1998. Engineering growth: business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 404-440.
Khanna T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 41-51.
Khanna T., & Palepu, K. 2000a. The future of business groups in emerging markets: long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 268-85.
Khanna T., & Palepu, K. 2000b. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2): 867-891.
Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1): 45-74.
Khanna, T., Palepu, K., & Sinha, J. 2005. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6): 63-76.
Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Wan, W. P. 2004. Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7): 613-636.
Kock, C. J., & Guillén, M. F. 2001. Strategy and structure in developing countries: Business groups as an evolutionary response to opportunities for unrelated diversification. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1): 77-113.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471-517.
Leff, N. H. 1976. Capital markets in the less developed countries: The group principal. In R. McKinnon (Ed.), Money and finance in economic growth and development. New York: Dekker, 97-122.
Leff, N. H. 1978. Industrial organizations and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(4): 661-675.
Lewellen, W. 1971. A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. Journal of Finance, 26(2): 521-537.
Li, M., & Wong, Y. Y. 2003. Diversification and economic performance: An empirical assessment of Chinese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(2): 243-265.
Liebeskind, J. P. 2000. Internal capital markets: Benefits, costs, and organizational arrangements. Organization Science, 11(1): 58-76.
Lieu, P. T., & Chi, C. W. 2006. How much does industry matter in Taiwan? International Journal of Business, 11(4): 387-402.
Lincoln, J. R., Gerlach, M. L., & Ahmadjian, C. L. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61(1): 67-88.
Lins, K., & Servaes, H. 1999. International evidence on the value of corporate diversification. Journal of Finance, 54(6): 2215-2239.
Lins, K., & Servaes, H. 2002. Is corporate diversification beneficial in emerging markets? Financial Management, 31: 5-31.
Lubatkin, M. A., & O'' Neill, H. M. 1987. Merger strategies and capital market risk. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4): 665-684.
Lubatkin, M., & Chatterjee, S. 1994. Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply? Academy of Management Journal, 37(1): 109-136.
Luo, X., & Chung, C. N. 2005. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 404-439.
Markides, C. C. 1995. Diversification, restructuring and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2): 101-118.
Markides, C. C. 1992. Consequences of corporate refocusing: Ex ante evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2): 398-412.
Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. 1994. Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 149-165.
McGahan, A. M., & Porter, M. E. 1997. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, 18(Special Issue): 15-30.
Merit, G., Kyj, L., Welsh, C., & Merit, I. 2000. A comparison of the financial characteristics of Japanese "keiretsu-affiliated" and "independent" firms. Multinational Business Review, 8 (2): 26-30.
Michel, A., & Shaked, I. 1984. Does business diversification affect financial performance? Financial Management, 13(4): 18-25.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. 1992. Economics, organization, and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Montgomery, C. A. 1985. Product-market diversification and market power. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4): 789-798.
Montgomery, C. A. 1994. Corporate diversification. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(3): 163-178.
North, C. D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palepu, K. 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance, and the entropy measure of diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 239-255.
Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. 2000. Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2): 155-174.
Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2): 492-528.
Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of Growth of the Firm. John Wiley: New York.
Peteraf, M. A., 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179-191.
Porter, M. E. 1987. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65 (13): 43-59.
Ramanujam, V., & Varadaraja, P. 1989. Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6): 523-551.
Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Petitt, B. S. P. 2004. Who drives unrelated diversification? A study of Indian manufacturing firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 403-423.
Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. F. 1995. A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4): 277-299.
Rumelt R. P., Schendel, D. E., & Teece, D. J. 1994. Fundamental issues in strategy. Harvard Business School Press, 9-53.
Rumelt, R. 1991. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3): 167-185.
Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3: 359-369.
Scherer, F. M., 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
Schmalensee R. 1985. Do markets differ much? American Economic Review, 75(3): 341-351.
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seth, A. 1990. Sources of value creation in acquisitions: An empirical investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6): 431-446.
Sharma, A., & Kesner, I. 1996. Diversifying entry: Some ex ante explanations for postentry survival and growth, Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 635-677.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1992. Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach, Journal of Finance, 47(4): 1343-1366.
Tanriverdi, H., & Venkatraman, N. 2005. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 97-119.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533.
Teece, D.J. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1): 39-63.
Thompson, J. D., 1967. Organizations in Action: Theory and Practice, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Trautwein, F. 1990. Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4): 283-295.
Tsai, W. 2000. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9): 925-939.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269-296.
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1-33.
Yeh, Y. H. 2005. Do controlling shareholders enhance corporate value? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2): 313-325.
Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2(1/2): 21-48.
Yin, X., & Zajac, E. J. 2004. The strategy/governance structure fit relationship: theory and evidence in franchising arrangements. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4): 365-383.
Yiu, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. 2005. Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. The Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 183-206.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：873（臺灣：865，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67702229
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上