中文部分
朱美珍、余仁朋、白玉華、李家璐、王士賓、盧建良（2009）。非選擇題型之微積分評量系統建置與其學習績效探究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。
考選部（2010）。國家考試電子計算器措施。2010年11月20日，引自
http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/content/wfrmContentLink.aspx?menu_id=162&sub_menu_id=1221
何榮桂（1997）。從「測驗電腦化與電腦化測驗」再看網路化測驗。測驗與輔導，144，2972-2974。
何榮桂（1998）。從教育部之資訊教育推展策略看未來中小學資訊教育的 遠景。資訊與教育，68，2-13。
余民寧（1993）。試題反應理論介紹 (二) ：基本概念與假設。研習資訊， 1（9），5-9。
余民寧（1997）。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。台北: 心理。
余民寧（2009）。試題反應理論IRT及其應用。台北: 心理。
呂溪木（1983）。從國際科展看我國今後科學教育發展的方向。科學數育月刊，64，13-19。
李淑娟（2003）。符合SCORM2004與試題結構理論之電腦化適性測驗系 統及動畫補救教學模組－以國小數學領域五年級能力指標幾何為例。（未發表的碩士論文）。台中：亞洲大學資訊工程學系。
李隆生（2000）。大學生對數學和微積分的認知。數學傳播，3（24），84-86。
辛靜宜、林珊如、葉秋呈（2005）。五年制專科學生微積分學習動機與策略之初期研究微積分的學習動機與學習策略之研究。南大學報，39（2），65-82。吳慧珉、張育蓁、林宏昇(2012)。結合知識結構之Q矩陣設計於DINA模
式之估計成效探究。測驗統計年刊，12，1-30。
姜善鑫(1998)。地理科迷思概念探討。發表於國民中學學生概念學習學術 研討會。台北市，台灣大學教務處教育學程中心。
施慶麟（2007）。題組與多向度電腦適性測驗之選題策略的比較。（未發表的博士論文）。嘉義：國立中正大學心理所。張道治（2005）。EO44工程科學基礎教育中心之建置計畫。2006年12月20日，引自www. dyu. edu.tw/~ mfht206/project1.htm
許家驊（2001）。國小三年級數學多階段動態評量之研究。（未發表的博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育學系。教育部統計處（2012）。大學部以上學生人數排名前十大系所。2013年5月30日，取自http://www.edu.tw
梁淑坤（1996）。研究與教學合一：以分析『一元二次方程式』的錯誤為一個例子。嘉義師院學報，10，456 - 472。
郭伯臣、謝友振、張峻豪、蔡坤穎（2005）。以結構理論為基礎之適性測驗與適性補救教學線上系統。台灣數位學習發展研討會，2005年5月6 -7日，國立台灣師範大學。
郭重吉（1988）。從認知觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學院學報，130，335-363。
郭嘉聲（2011）。高中學生複數概念學習之錯誤類型分析與研究。(未發表的碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學數學系。
陳宏璋（2003）。線上適性測驗系統之建置－以中華大學英語字彙測驗為例。（未發表的碩士論文）。新竹：中華大學資訊管理學系(所)。
陳怡如、陳雁芳（2004)。知識結構分析數學教材之歷程探究，測驗統計簡訊，63，1-15 。台中市。台中師範學院。
黃珮璇、王暄博、郭伯臣、劉湘川（2006）。國小數學科電腦化適性診斷測驗強韌性探究。2006年電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會，2006年3月23-24日，國立新竹教育大學。
楊智為、張雅媛、郭伯臣、許天維（2006）。以試題結構理論為基礎之適性測驗選題策略強韌性探究。2006 數位科技與創新管理國際研討會，2006 年 4 月1 日，華梵大學。
鄭百恩（2007）。Excel輔助微積分學習之教學實驗研究。(未發表的碩士論文）。彰化：國立彰化師範大學數學系所。
蕭金土(1995)。國小數學學習障礙學生的鑑定、學習問題診斷及學習策略教學效果之研究。(未發表的博士論文）。台北市：國立政治大學教育研究所。譚寧君（1998）。高年級面積教材分析。載於台灣省國民學校教師研習會編印：國民小學數學科新課程概說（高年級），214-229。
英文部分
Adnanes, M., & Ronning, W. M. (1998). Computer-networks in education – a better way to learn ? Journal of compute assisted learning, 14(2), 148-157.
Baek, S. G., & Kim, K. J. (2003). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment Based Instruction on Children’s Learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 189-198.
Bransford, J. C., Delclos, J. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, 479–496.
Budoff, M., & Corman, L. (1974). Demographic and psychometric factors related to improved performanceon the Kohs learning potential procedure. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 578-585.
Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment, 173-195.
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 367-407). New York: Macmillan.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data. Teachnical report No. 361. Nation Inst. Of Child Health and Human Development, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 26973).
Chang, K. E., Liu, S. H., & Chen, S. W. (1998). A testing system for diagnosing
misconceptions in DC electric circuits. Computer & Education, 31, 195-210.
Chi, T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice, 3-27.
Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G. (1995, April). New Algorithms for Item Selection and Exposure Control with Computerized Adaptive Testing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
Economides, D. I., & Chatzopoulou, A. A. (2010). Adaptive assessment of student’s knowledge in programming courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 258-269.
Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: realising potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15-32.
Erin, C., Douglas, F., & Lynn, S. F. (2008). The Predictive Validity of Dynamic Assessment: A Review, Journal of Special Education. 41(4), 254-270.
Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instrument, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Gleason, A. M., Hughes H. D., & Brettschneider C. (1990). Harvard Consortium. In T. W.Tucker (Ed.) Priming the Calculus Pump: Innovations and Resources, MAA Notes 17, 241.
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bullentin, 124, 75-111.
Guthke, J. & Beckmann, J.F. (2000). The learning test concept and its application in practice. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: prevailing models and applications, 17-70.Haripersad R. (2011). Deep and surface learning of elementary calculus
concepts in a blended learning environment. International Journal of mathematics and computers in simulation, 4(5), 291-298.
Haripersad R. & Naidoo R. (2008). Errors made by First Year Students in an Integral Calculus Course using Web-Based Learning. Proceedings of the
7th WSEAS International Conference on circuits, systems, electronics, control and signal processing (CSECS'08), 303-316.
Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psycho- educational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 411–422.
Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and Teaching with Understanding. In Grouws, D. A. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 65-97. New York: Macmillan.
Hughes H. D. (1991). Visualization and Calculus Reform. In W. Zimmermann & S.Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, MAA Notes No. 19,121–126.
Interactive Mathematics Miscellany and Puzzles (2013). What Is Calculus?. Retrieved April 25,2013, from http://www.cut-the-knot.org/WhatIs/ WhatIs Calculus. shtml
Jacobs, E. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22, 217-226.Jitendra A. K., & Kameenui E. J. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysis. Remedical and Special Education, 14(5), 6-18.
Koirala, H. P. (1997). Teaching of Calculus for students’ conceptual understanding. The Mathematics Educator, 2(1), 52-62.
Lajoie, S.P. (2003). Transitions and trajectories for studies of expertise. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 21-25.
Lidz, C. S. (2009). Dynamic Assessment in School Psychology, Communiqué, October 2009, 38(2), 16-18.
Lund, K. (2005). The role of the assessor-student interaction in individual dynamic assessment with low and high achievers. EARLI (European Association for Research, Learning and Instruction), 11th Biennial International Conference, University of Cyprus. Nicosia, Cyprus. August 23-27, 2005.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States.
Marja, H. P., & Monica, W. U. (2005). Mathematics standards and curricula in the Netherlands. ZDM, 37(4), 287-307.
Nirmalakhandan, N. (2007). Computerized Dynamic Assessment. International Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal September, 3-7.
Nirmalakhandan, N. (2009). Use of Computerized Dynamic Assessment to Improve Student Achievement: Case Study. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(2), 75-80.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Boston, MA : Springer Science + Business Media, B.V.
Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 159-174.
Schwarzenberger, R. L. E. (1984), The importance of mistakes: the 1984 presidential address, The Mathematical Gazette, 68 (445), 159–172.
Shermis, M. D., & Fulkerson, J. (1996). Computerized adaptive math tests for elementary talent development selection. Roeper Review, 19(2), 91-95.
Smit, M. (2010). Educational psychologists’ views on the relevance of dynamic assessment for their practice, Supervisor: Lynette Collair, December 2010.Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Educational Psychology (M. Ed Psych.) At Stellenbosch University.
Stick, M. E. (1997). Calculus reform and graphing calculators: a university view. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 356.
Stoney, S., & Wild, M. (1998). Motivation and interface design: maximizing learning opportunities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 40-50.
Tao, Y. H., Wu, Y. L., & Chang, H. Y. (2008). A Practical Computer Adaptive Testing Model for Small-Scale Scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 259- 274.
Tarmizi R. A. (2010). Visualizing Students’ Difficulties in Learning Calculus.
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 377–383.
Thorpe, P. K. (1999). A hierarchical linear modeling approach towards the dynamic assessment of mathematical conceptual learning. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9835543.
Ting, M. Y., & Kuo, B. C. (2012). Establish a Dynamic Assessment Test System for “Calculus” Using :Limit and Continuous Function" Unit as an Example. International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control. Taichung, Taiwan: National Taichung University of Education.
Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic Assessment of Young Children: Educational and Intervention Perspectives, Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 385-435.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wainer, H. (1983). On item response theory and computerized adaptive tests: The Coming Technological resolution in testing. Journal of College Admissions, 28(4), 9-16.
Wainer, H. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wang, T. H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54, 1157-1166.
Wauters, K., Desmet, P., & Van den Noortgate. (2010). Adaptive item-based learning environments based on the item response theory: possibilities and challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 549-562.
Wise, S. L., & Kingsbury, G. G. (2000). Practical issues in developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program. Psicológica, 21, 135-155.
Wu, H. M., Kuo, B. C., & Yang, J. M. (2012). Evaluating Knowledge Structure-based Adaptive Testing Algorithms and System Development. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 73-88.