:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一個針對基礎數學學習者的線上評量與迷思概念導正工具
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 數理科技類
作者:李青春胡學誠
作者(外文):Lee, Ching-chuenHu, Shueh-cheng
出版日期:2009
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:數位學習線上輔助學習補救教學迷思概念E-learningOn-line assisted learningRemedial instructionMisconception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:1545
  • 點閱點閱:211
網路上關於國中數學教材的呈現方式偏重於循序單向的展示,以至於有些學生在瀏覽後只能似懂非懂。當學生點選課後評量來評鑑個人的學習成果,得到的回饋只是對或錯,但對於錯誤原因或迷思概念,欠缺適時且確切地指導。 針對上述問題,本研究主要目的是建立一個針對基礎數學學習者的線上評量與迷思概念導正工具。學習者在多項式四則運算的解題過程中,如果解題步驟中出現錯誤,系統能即時告知錯誤的原因,以導正學生的認知過程,可作爲補救教學的輔助工具。 爲評估線上評量與迷思概念導正工具對學習者進行補救教學的成效,研究之樣本爲臺中縣立大甲國民中學二個一年級班級,一班爲實驗組另一班爲控制組,實施爲期五週共十小時的補救教學。每週於補救教學結束後,進行多項式四則運算成就測驗的後測評量,將得到的資料做統計與分析。 本研究採前測、後測之準實驗研究設計,資料分析採用獨立樣本t 考驗、單因子共變數分析及描述統計方法。本研究所獲得結論敘述如下: 1.線上評量與迷思概念導正工具,可診斷不同類型之錯誤,學習者隨時隨地皆能進行適性化之補救教學。 2.接受線上評量與迷思概念導正工具進行補救教學的學生,在經過一段時間後,學習成就測驗上的表現會高於接受傳統講述式進行補救教學的學生。其顯示之意涵爲要改變學生既有的迷思概念不是短期內可達成的。此一現象正突顯了線上評量與迷思概念導正工具,在長時間的教學輔導過程中,可降低教學者負擔方面的價值。
Today, the presentation of online mathematical instructional materials tends to be sequential and one-way. As a result, students obtain fragmental and vague concepts after browsing Web pages containing these materials. In addition, when students want to evaluate their learning performance, what they can receive is only a grade, instead of the specific explanations about their mistakes or misconceptions. To address the above problems, this work aims to build an on-line assessment and misconception correction tool for those who learn fundamental mathematics. The students learn how to solve polynomial equations through the tool. Whenever students make any recognized mistakes during the solving process, the tool instantly assists them to explore the reason of making mistake. These responsive feedbacks are helpful to guide them toward the correct direction during their cognitive processes. Thus, this tool can be used as a teaching assistant for remedial learning. To evaluate the effectiveness of this tool, a quasi-experimental design was implemented in this study. This research sampled two classes (Grade) that enrolled in Tachia Junior High School in Taichung County. One is taken as the experimental group and the other as the control group. During a five-week period, the experimental group accepted total ten-hour remedial learning through the tool, while the control group takes traditional instruction. After every week of remedial learning, a post-test is conducted in order to collect data for statistical analysis. The collected data is analyzed by T-test, One-way ANCOVA and descriptive statistic method. The findings through this work are described as follows: 1. On-line assessment and misconception correction tool can diagnose the different mistakes of students. It could serve as an assistant for adaptive remedial instruction. 2. After five weeks of trial, the students who utilized the tool obtained significantly higher learning achievement than those who enrolled in the traditional instructional environment. It implies that correcting students' misconception about Mathematics should not be regarded as a short-term task. This phenomenon further reveals the value of this tool in reducing instructors' burden with repetitive and long-term correction tasks.
期刊論文
1.Booth, L. R.(1984)。Child-method in Secondary Mathematics。Education Studies in Mathematics,12,29-41。  new window
2.Engelhardt, J. M.(1982)。Using Computational Errors in Diagnostic Teaching。Arithmetic Teacher,29(8),16-19。  new window
3.郭丁熒(1992)。追根究底談錯誤--有關學生錯誤的二十個問題。國教之友,44(2),17-23。  延伸查詢new window
4.喻平、馬再鳴(2002)。論數學概論學習。數學傳播,26(2),89-95。  延伸查詢new window
5.Carpenter, T. P.(1982)。Student performance in algebra: Results from the national assessment。School Science and Mathematics,82(6),514-531。  new window
6.Vincent, L. F.(2004)。Doing the Math: It's More than Numbers。Principal Doing the Math Postscript,84(2),64-65。  new window
7.范德鑫(19920600)。共變數分析功能、假設及使用之限制。師大學報,37,133-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.游寶達、劉明宗(20020600)。電子化學習之發展趨勢探討與分析。資訊與教育,89,3-9。  延伸查詢new window
9.韓善民(20010200)。我國資訊教育發展現況與展望。資訊與教育,81,7-12。  延伸查詢new window
10.邱美虹(20000300)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Posner, G. J.、Strike, K. A.、Hewson, P. W.、Gertzog, W. A.(1982)。Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change。Science Education,66(2),211-227。  new window
會議論文
1.Pines, A. L.(1980)。A Model for Program Development and Evaluation: The Formative Role of Summative Evaluation and Research in Science Education。The Annual Conference of the International Congress for Individualized Industruction(12th)。Canada:Windsor。  new window
研究報告
1.郭汾派、林光賢、林福來(1989)。國中生文字符號概念的發展 (計畫編號:NSC 76-0111-S003-08)。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳創義、洪有情(2003)。青少年的代數運算概念發展研究 (計畫編號:NSC 91-2522-S-003-016)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江佳惠(2001)。以幾何面積爲類比物教授國一代數乘法公式之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李璧如(2006)。改善國中生電流消耗模式迷思概念之教學策略研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉天民(1993)。高雄地區國一學生數學整數與分數四則運算錯誤類型之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡玟錦(1991)。發展紙筆測驗以探究高三學生對化學平衡的迷思概念(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄧雅文(2004)。我國中學生平衡迷思概念和心智模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.戴文賓(1999)。國一學生由算術領域轉入代數領域呈現的學習現象與特徵(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鍾聖校(1995)。國小自然科課程教學研究。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Skemp, R. R.、陳澤民(1987)。數學學習心理學。臺北:九章。  延伸查詢new window
3.康軒(2007)。國民中學數學。臺北:康軒文教事業。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊弢亮(1997)。中學數學教學法通論。臺北:九章出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ashlock, R. B.(1990)。Error patterns in computation: A semi-programmed approach。Columbus, Ohio:Merrill。  new window
6.Gagne, R. M.(1970)。The condition of learning。New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winstone。  new window
7.Pella, M. O.(1975)。Concept of Concept。University of Wisconsin-Mwdison。  new window
8.Seels, B.、Richey, R.(1994)。Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field。Washington, DC:Association for Education Communication and Technology。  new window
9.林清山(1988)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.、Weaver, H.(1969)。The Psychology of the Child。New York, NY:Basic Book。  new window
11.王文科(1993)。教育研究法。五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Ebel, R. L.(1979)。Essentials of educational measurement。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
13.Ahmann, J. Stanley、Glock, Marvin David(1981)。Evaluating Student Progress: Principles of Tests and Measurements。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
單篇論文
1.Baker, W. P.(1995)。Effect of analogic instruction and reasoning level on achievement in general genetics(No.390713)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kuchemann, D. E.(1981)。Algebra。Children's understandings of mathematics。London:John Murry。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE