:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:弱勢者學習協助計畫:不應只有補救教學
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:許添明 引用關係
出版日期:2010
卷期:199
頁次:頁32-42
主題關鍵詞:弱勢學生補救教學課後輔導
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:99
  • 點閱點閱:352
期刊論文
1.洪儷瑜、黃冠穎(200609)。兩種取向的部件識字教學法對國小低年級語文低成就學生之成效比較。特殊教育研究學刊,31,43-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王佳蕙、許添明(20030500)。原住民學童服務機制困境與整合式服務學校。國立彰化師範學院教育研究所教育學報,4,167-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.永齡希望小學(2009)。【牽阮ㄟ手】孩子,這一路你不會孤獨。永齡希望小學專刊,4,14-19。  延伸查詢new window
4.張良丞、王保進、許添明(2010)。國民小學適足經費之評估:成本函數法。教育與心理研究,33(4)。  延伸查詢new window
5.許添明、黃木蘭(20000300)。教師獎勵措施與原住民國小師資結構:以花蓮縣為例。教育研究資訊雙月刊,8(2),99-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.許添明、林慧玲(2009)。偏遠地區公立中小學校績效獎金計畫之建構。教育科學研究期刊(原師大學報:教育類,54(4),115-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Drotar, D.(1993)。Influences on collaborative activities among psychologists and pediatricians: Implications for practice, training, and research。Journal of Pediatric Psychology,18,159-172。  new window
8.Kelley, C.、Conley, S.、Kimball, S.(2000)。Payment for results: The effects of the Kentucky and Maryland group-based performance award program。Peabody Journal of Education,75(4),159-199。  new window
9.Kelley, C.、Heneman, G.、Milanowski, A.(2002)。Teacher motivation and school-based performance award。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(3),372-401。  new window
10.King, R. A.、Mathers, J. K.(1997)。Improving schools through performance-based accountability and financial rewards。Journal of Education Finance,23,147-176。  new window
11.Ladd, H. F.(1999)。The Dallas School accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impacts on student outcomes。Economics of Education Review,18(1),1-16。  new window
12.Smith, S. S.、Mickelson, R. A.(2000)。All that glisters is not gold: School reform in Charlotte- Mecklenburg。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,22(2),101-127。  new window
13.許添明、張琦琪(20021200)。原住民學校推動社區本位教育之研究。教育研究集刊,48(4),103-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Jordan, C. F.(1999)。Using collaborative action teams to create community schools。NASSP Bulletin,83(611),48-56。  new window
15.許添明、廖鳴鳳(19981100)。我國教育優先區計畫問題與對策--以花蓮縣第一年實踐經驗為例。教育研究資訊,6(6),100-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Fuchs, L. S.、Fuchs, D.(1998)。Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities。Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,13(4),204-219。  new window
17.陳淑麗(2008)。國小學生弱勢學生課輔現況調查研究。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),1-32。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Stecher, B. M.、Barron, S.(199904)。Testbased accountability: The perverse consequences of milepost testin。the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Montreal, Canada。  new window
研究報告
1.臺灣省政府社會處(1997)。臺灣省山地鄉原住民社會福利需求調查報告。南投:臺灣省政府社會處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.許添明(2003)。教育財政制度新論。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳麗珠(2000)。美國教育財政改革。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Caldwell, B. J.(2002)。學校自主經營的理論與實踐。學校本位經營的理念與實務。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
5.Heneman, R. L.、Ledford, G. E., Jr.、Gresham, M. T.(2000)。The changing nature of work。Compensation in organizations。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Dryfoos, J. G.(1994)。Full-service schools: A revolution in health and social services for children, youth, and families。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
7.Odden, A. R.(1988)。How fiscal accountability and program quality can be insured for Chpater1。Federal aid to the disadvantaged: What future for chapter I?。New York:Falmer。  new window
8.Odden, A. R.、Kelley, C.(2002)。Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
9.Odden, A. R.、Picus, L. O.(2008)。School finance: A policy perspective。New York:Mcgraw-Hill。  new window
10.Poggio, J. P.(2000)。Statewide performance assessment and school accountability。All children can learn: Lessons from the Kentucky reform experience。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
11.The Campaign for Educational Equity(2007)。An introduction to CEF。New York:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
12.U.S. Department of Education(2008)。An introduction to NAEP: National assessment of educational progress。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。  new window
其他
1.行政院原住民族委員會(2010)。97年度教育現況調查: 三、高中職以下學校學生低收入戶、單親家庭、隔代依親教養情形,http://cip.cpc.org.tw/index.aspx?DOC_SNO=WP01-82&Page_ID=WP01&Yearly=97&PageFrom=0, 20101012。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2008)。96年度施政績效報告,http://www.edu.tw/files_temp/site_content/EDU01/96年施政績效報告(含行政院評核意見).pdf, 20101010。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2009)。97年度施政績效報告,http://www.edu.tw/files_temp/site_content/EDU01/97年施政績效報告(含行政院評核意見).pdf, 20101010。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2010)。98年度施政績效報告,http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0010/教育部98年度施政績效報告公告版(990702).pdf, 20101010。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2010)。第八次全國教育會議 十大教育議題(貳):教育體制與教育資源,http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0010/教改―十大議題02.pdf, 20101012。  延伸查詢new window
6.Burnett, G.(1994)。The unfulfilled mission of Title 1/Chapter 1 program.(ED376263)。,Washington, DC:Office of Educational Research and Improvement。  new window
7.McKinsey & Company.(2007)。How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top,http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/socialsector/resources/pdf/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf, 20071112。  new window
8.Odden, A. R.,Wallace, M.(2007)。How to achieve world class teacher,http://www.freeloadpress.com, 20070723。  new window
9.OECD(2008)。The PISA International Database,http:// pisa2006.acer.edu.au/, 20081212。  new window
10.U.S. Department of Education(2009)。The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009,http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/recovery/programs.html, 20091002。  new window
11.U.S. Department of Education(2010)。Summary of the 2011 Budget,http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget11/summary/edlite-section1.html, 20101010。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE