:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高達美對柏拉圖哲學之詮釋與運用-以其對哲學詮釋學效應史的影響與視域融合為重點
作者:連雋偉
作者(外文):Jiunn-Woei Lian
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:國家發展研究所
指導教授:陳顯武
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:高達美柏拉圖哲學詮釋學辯證式對話語言學的轉向邏格斯Hans-Georg Gadamerphilosophical hermeneuticsdialogue in dialectic from PlatoLinguistic turnlogos
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
本文旨在談討高達美的柏拉圖詮釋。目前探討哲學詮釋學之有
關二手文獻,大多將高達美有關柏拉圖的論述,與其詮釋學作分開
處理,卻忽略唯有透過柏拉圖詮釋,才能對其哲學詮釋學的精髓有
充分的掌握。高達美認為柏拉圖體現了結合理論與實踐的在世關懷
。然而,在高達美的思想中,存在著三個柏拉圖:政治柏拉圖、辯
證的柏拉圖與批判柏拉圖。政治的柏拉圖顯示高達美借用柏拉圖來
諷刺納粹德國欲把語言私有激情化的企圖;辯證的柏拉圖則是高達
美透過回溯到柏拉圖對話錄中的生動活潑、一來一往的對話,來揭
示詮釋是一種與他者共同參與創造意義的過程;透過描繪批判的柏
拉圖,高達美則認為柏拉圖藉由數學淨化語言的提議,為當代工具
主義語言觀打了開端。於是,三種柏拉圖,三個語言面向,一同存
在高達美對於柏拉圖的詮釋中。
This is a brief study of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s major works on Plato.Most commentators on Gadamer’s work separate his works on Plato from those on hermeneutics. This essay attempts to show that Gadamer’s hermeneutics discloses itself in its most distinctive contours only in the light of his works on Plato.Gadamer argued that both the essentially open-ended and ethical character of Platonic philosophy are reflected in its dialectical form. Plato tells us that human beings are not gods and thus the life best for human beings has to be a life combining theoria and praxis. However,this article find out there are three Platos in Gadamer’s thought: political Plato, dialectical Plato, and critical Plato. By interpreting political Plato,Gadamer actually intends to employ public reason to constrain The Third Reich‘s attempt to Privatization language. In dialectical Plato,Gadamer argued, that any true conversations do not proceed geometrico. Instead, we move back and forth, and it deals with different matters altogether. Through portraying critical Plato,Gadamer criticizes that Plato prefaces the Galilean-Cartesian mathematical understanding of language. Thus both three Platos and dimensions of language exist in Gadamer’s work on Plato.
參考文獻
壹、高達美著作
Gesammelte Werke .10 vols.(Tubingen:J. C. B. Mohr,1985-1995)
GW1 Hermeneutik I.Wahrheit und Methode:Grundzage einer philosophischen Hermeneutik.1986.
GW2 Hermeneutik II. Wahrheit und Methode. Ergiinzungen, Register.1986.
GW3 Neuere Philosophie I:Hegel,Husserl,Heidegger.1987.
GW4 Neuere Philosophie II:Problem,Gestalten.1987.
GW5 Griechische Philosophie I.1985.
GW6 Griechische Philosophie II.1985.
GW7 Griechische Philosophie III:Plato im Dialog.1991.
GW8 Asthetik und Poetik I:Kunst als Aussage.1993.
GW9 Asthetik und Poetik II: Hermeneutik im Vollzug.1993.
GW10 Hermeneutik im Ruckblick.1995.
Dialogue and Dialectic : Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato,trans. P. C. Smith(Yale University Press, 1980).
Dialogue and Deconstruction, ed.R. Palmer(State University of New York Press, 1989)
Hans-Georg Gadamer on education, poetry, and history : applied hermeneutics,trans. L. Schmidt & M. Reuss,ed. D. Misgeld & G. Nicholson(State University of New York Press, 1992).
Hegel’s Dialectic : Five Hermeneutical Studies, trans. P. C. Smith(Yale University Press,1976).
Hermeneutics and Truth,trans. & ed. B. R. Wachterhauser (Northwestern University Press,1994)
Heidegger’s Way, trans. J. W. Stanley(State University of New York Press,1994)
The Gadamer Reader-A Bounquet of the later Writings,.ed.R. Palmer(Northwestern University Press,2007)
The Idea of The Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy,.trans.P. C. Smith (Yale University Press,1986)
Truth and Method.trans. J. Weinshimer & D. G. Marshall (The Continuum Publishing, 1994).
“The Hermeneutics of Suspicion”in Hermeneutics:Questions and Prospects, ed. G. Shapiro & A. Sica (The University of Massachusetts Press,1984),pp.54-65.
Philosophical Apprenticeships ,trans. Robert R. Sullivan (The MIT Press ,1985).
Philosophical Hermeneutics ,trans. & ed. D. E. Linge (University of California Press ,1977).
Plato''s dialectical ethics : phenomenological interpretations relating to the Philebus,translated and with an introduction by Robert M. Wallace(New Haven: Yale University Press,1991)
Reason in the Age of Science,trans. F. G. Laerence (The MIT Press ,1983).
The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays,trans N. Walker,ed. R. Bernasconi (Cambridge University Press,1987).
The Beginning of Knowledge,trans.Rod Coltman (N.Y.:Continuum Press,2001)
“Gdadmer on Gadamer” in Gadamer and Hermeneutics,trans.B. Schaaf and G. E. Aylesworth,ed. H. J. Silverman (Routledge,1991),pp.13-22.
“Historical Transformation of Reason” in Rationality TO-DAY,ed. T. F. Geraets (The University of Ottawa Press,1979),pp.3-14.
《詮釋學I真理與方法-哲學詮釋學的基本特徵》,洪漢鼎譯(台北:時報文化出版,1996)。
《詮釋學II真理與方法-補充與索引》,洪漢鼎、夏鎮平譯(台北:時報文化出版,1996)。
《伽達默爾集》,嚴平編選,鄧安慶等譯 (上海:上海遠東出版社,1997)。
《贊美理論》,夏鎮平譯 (上海:新華書局,1988)。

貳、其他參考著作
一、外文著作
Adorno, Theodor W.; et al.,The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology,Glyn Adey and David Frisby trans.(London: Heinemann,1976)
Ambrosio, F. J. “Gadamer, Plato and the Discipline Dialogue” International Philosophical Quarterly 27(1987):217-32
Apel,Karl-Otto “Das Verstehen: Eine Problemgeschichte als Begriffsgeschichte” Archiv fur Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 1(1955):142-199.
¾¾¾ . Hegel-Studien,Bd 2(Bonn: H. Bouvier u. Co. Verlag,1963)
¾¾¾ . Bormann/Bubner u. a.Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971)
¾¾¾ . “Regulative Ideas or Truth-happening?An Attempt to Answer the Question of the Conditions of the Possibility of Valid Understanding”in The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer(The Library of Living Philosophers,Vol.23),pp.67-94
¾¾¾ .Towards a transformation of philosophy, Glyn Adey and David Frisby,trans.,( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,1980)
Augustine, St. of Hippo,Confessions,trans.,H. Chadwick(Oxford University Press,Rev.,1998)
¾¾¾ .On Christian Doctrine,trans. D. W. Ronertson(Indianapolis,1958)
Aristotle ,Aristotle''s categories and de interpretatione ,trans.& notes by J.L. Ackrill (Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1963.)
¾¾¾ . Nicomachean Ethics, trans. H. Rackham, (Harvard University Press,1956)
Bernstein, Richard. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis(University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983)
Betti, Emilio.Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisseswissenschaften, in Contemporary Hermeneutics. J. Bleichar trans. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980)
¾¾¾ . “The Epistemological Problem of Understanding As an Aspect of the General Problem of Knowing”in Hermeneutics:Questions and Prospects, trans. Susan Noakes,ed. G. Shapiro & A. Sica (The University of Massachusetts Press,1984),pp.29-53.
Bleicher, Josef .Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy, and critique(Routledge & Kegan Paul,1980).
¾¾¾ . The Hermeneutic Imagination(Routledge Kegan & Paul,1982).
Bontekoe, R. Dimensions of the Hermeneutics Circle(Humanities Press,1996).
¾¾¾ . “A Fusion of Horizons : Gadamer and Schleiermacher” International Philosophical Quarterly 17(1987):3-16.
Bruns, G. L. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern(Yale University Press,1992).
Bruzina ,R. and Wilshire ,B. ed. The Conflict of Hermeneutics: Debate with Hans Georg Gadamer” in Phenomenology: Dialogues and Bridges, (Albany:State University of New York 1982)
Bubner ,Rudiger/Gadamer; et al., Cultural Hermeneutics 2 (1975)
Buck, G. “The Structure of Hermeneutics Experience and the Problem of Tradtiton” New Literary History 10(1981):87-96.
Bulhof, I. N. Wilhelm Dilthey : A Hermeneutics to the study of History and Culture(The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Press, 1980).
Dallmayr, F. “Hermeneutics and the Justices” in Festivals of Interpretation, K. Wright Eds.,( State University of New York Press,1990),pp.90-110.
Derrida,Jacques Margins of Philosophy(University of Chicago Press, 1982)
Deretić,Irina.” Dispute About Plato''s unwritten doctrine”, Philosophical Inquiry(Vol. 25, Issue 3/4, 2003),pp.87-97.
DiCenso, J. Hermeneutics and the disclosure of Truth(University Press of Virginia,1990).
Dilthey, W., R. Makkreel Eds., Introduction to the Human Sciences : Wilhelm Dilthey Selected Work, Vol,1(Princeton University Press,1989).
¾¾¾ . H. P. Rickman Eds., & Trans., Selected Writings(Cambridge University Press,1976).
¾¾¾ . Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding(The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Press,1971).
Dostal, Robert J. “Gadamer’s Continuous Chanllenge:Heidegger’s Plato Interpretation”,The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer ,ed.Lewos Edwin Hahn(Open Court Publishing,1997),pp.289-308.
Dunning, Stephen N. Dialectical Readings:Three Types of Interpretations(Penn State University Press,1997).
Ebeling,G.”Art:Hermeneutik”.in Religion in Geshichte und Gegenwart(3d ed.,Tbingen,1959)3:242-62
Ermarth, M. Wilhelm Dilthey : The Critique of Historical Reason(The Chicago University Press,1978).
¾¾¾ . “The Transformation of Hermeneutics : 19th Century Ancients and 20th Century Moderns” Monist 64(1981):175-94.
Farias, Victor .Heidegger and the Nazis, (Temple University Press in 1989).
Fuyarchuk, A. Gadamer’s Path to Plato(Wipf & Stock,2010).
George,Stefan. Plato,Bollingen Series vol.59,trans.H. Meyerhoff(Princeton University Press,1973)
Grondin, J.Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography ,trans.Joel Weinsheimer (Yale University Press ,2003).
¾¾¾ .Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics,J. Weinsheimer, trans.(Yale University Press,1994).
¾¾¾ .The Philosophy of Gadamer, Kathryn Plant , trans.( McGill University Press,2003).
¾¾¾ . Sources of Hermeneutics (State University of New York Press,1995).
Gulley,Norman“ Plato''s Unwritten Philosophy“, The Classical Review (25 :01,1975)
Habermas, Jurgen. Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. by Jeremy J. Shapiro,(Boston: Beacon Press 1971)
¾¾¾ .The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason,translated by Thomas McCarthy(Beacon Press,1985)
¾¾¾ .On the Logic of the Social Sciences, trans. by S. W. Nicholsen( Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988)
¾¾¾ . “Interviewing Habermas” New Left Review 151(1985):75-105.
¾¾¾ . “A Review of Gadamer’s Truth and Method”in Understanding and Social Inquiry, F. Dallmayr and McCarthy Thomas eds.,&trans(North Dame University Press,1977),pp.335-63.
¾¾¾ . “The Hermeneutical Claim to Universality”, in The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur,G. Barden and J.Cumming eds., J. Bleicher trans.(State Universitry Press,1990)pp.254-72.
Haward, J. The Platonic Epistles (New York,1976)
Heidegger, M. Being and Time,trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson (Haper & Row,1962)
¾¾¾ . On the Way to language. trans. P. D. Hertz (New York: Haper & Row,1971).
¾¾¾ . Basic Writings D. F. Krell Trans., & Eds., (Haper & Row,1976)
¾¾¾ . An Introduction to Metaphysics R. Mainhein Trans. (Yale University Press,1978).
¾¾¾ .Plato’s Sophist,trans.R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer(Indiana University Press,2003)
¾¾¾ .Ontology-The Hermeneutics of Facticity,trans. Jahn van Buren(Indiana University Press,1999)
¾¾¾ .Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research,trans.,Richard Rojcewicz(Indiana University Press,2001)
¾¾¾ .Pathmarks,trans.T.Sheehan , ed.William McNeill(Cambridge University Press,2nd,1999)
¾¾¾ . Nietzsche: Voluma One,trans.D. F. Krell(San Francisco:Haper San Francisco,1991)
Hinman, L. M. “Quid Facti or Quid Juris? The Fundmental Ambiguity of Gadamer’s understanding of Hermeneutics” Philosophy and phenomenology 40(1980):512-35
Hirsch,E. D.”Three Dimensions of Hermeneutics” New Literary History,3(1972)
¾¾¾ . Validity in Interpretation(New Haven:Yale University Press,1967)
Hobbed,T. Leviathan,ed.,R. Tuck (Cambridge University Press,Rev. Student ed.,1996)
Husserl, E., F. Kersten Trans., General Introduction To a Pure Phenomenology(The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff Press,1982).
¾¾¾ . D. Carr Trans., The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology(Northwestern University Press,1970).
¾¾¾ . D. Carins Trans., Cartesian Meditations(Nijhoff, The Hague,1960).
Jones ,Douglas “Defusing Gadamer’s Horizons”
http://capo.org/premise/95/dep/p950804.html.,1995, pp.1-9.
Joy, M. “Rhetoric and Hermeneutics” Philosophy Today 32(1988):273-85.
Kearney,Richard State of Mind-Dialogue with Contemporary Thinkers on European Mind(Manchester University Press 1995).
Lampert, J. “Gadamer and Cross-Cultural Hermeneutics” The Philosophy Forum 29(1997):35-68
Maier-Katkin ,Daniel and Maier-Katk,Birgit in, “Love and Reconciliation: The Case of Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger”, Harvard Review No. 32 (2007), pp. 34-48.
Michelfelder ,Diane P. & Palmer ,Richard E. eds.Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Ecounter(Albany:State University of New York 1989)
Morrow,Glenn R. Plato’s Epistles (Indianapolis,1962)
Murphy ,Sinead . Effective History: On Critical Practice Under Historical Conditions(Northwestern University Press,2010).
Muller-Voller, K. ed The Hermeneutics Reader (Basil Blackwell,1986).
Natorp,Paul .Platons Ideenlehre: Eine Einfuhrung in den Idealismus (2.Auflage,Hamburg,1921).
Nicholson,Grame.”Answers to Critical Theory,”in Gadamer and Hermeneutics,edited by Hugh J. Silverman( London:Routledge 1991),pp.151-62.
Ormiston, G. L. & Schift, A. D. Eds.,. & Trans., The Hermeneutic Tradition From Ast to Ricoeur(State University of New York Press, 1990).
Otto Poggeler,Der Denkweg Martin Heidegger(Pfullingen,1983)
¾¾¾ .Heidegger und die hermeneutische(Freibung/Munchen,1983)
Plato, Plato’s Phaedo, trans.R. Hackforth, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955).
¾¾¾ .The Republic,ed.G.R.F.Ferrari and trans.Tom Griffith (Cambridge University Press,6th,2003).
¾¾¾ .Philebus, tran. with noted and commentated by J.C.B.Gosling (Oxford University Press,1975).
¾¾¾ .Parmenides,translated by M. L. Gill and P. Ryan (Indianapolis:Hacket Pubishing Press,1996).
Peter, T. “The Nature and Role of Presupposition : An Inquiry into Contemporary Hermeneutics “International Philosophical Quarterly 14(1974):209-22.
Ricoeur,Paul. The Conflict of Interpretation,Essays in hermeneutics, Don Ihde eds.(Northwestern University Press,1974).
¾¾¾ .Hermeneutics and the Human Science,Essays on language,action, and inierpretation, John B. Thompson eds. & trans(NY:Cambridge University Press,1981)
¾¾¾ . Main Trends in Philosophy(NY.: Holmes and Meier,1979).
¾¾¾ .”Ethics and Culture:Harbermas and Gadamer in Dialogue.”Philosophy Today17(1973):153-65.
¾¾¾ .”Hermeneutics and the Critique of Ideology”,in Hermeneutics & the Human ¾ Sciences, John B. Thompson eds.& trans.(London:Cambridge1981),pp.63-100. ¾¾¾ .& Hans Georg Gadamer. “The Conflict of Hermeneutics: Debate with Hans ¾¾Georg Gadamer” in Phenomenology: Dialogues and Bridges,edited by R. ¾¾Bruzina and B. Wilshire(Albany:State University of New York 1982)pp..299-320
Risser, J. “Poetic Dwelling in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics” Philosophy Today 38:4(1994):368-79.
¾¾¾ . Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other(State University of New York Press,1997).
Ross. W.D. Plato`s Theory of Ideas (Oxford University press,1953).
Sayre,K. M. Plato’s Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved(Princeton University Press,1983).
Schleiermacher,F. Dialektik,ed.R. Odebrecht(Rpt. Darmsadt,1988).
¾¾¾ . Hermeneutik und Kiritik, edited by M Frank(Frankfurt,1977)
Schuckman, P. “Aristotle’s Phronesis and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics” Philosophy Today 23(1979):41-50.
Shapiro, G. & Sica, A. Eds., Hermeneutics : Questions and Prospects(The Massachusetts University Press,1984).
Smith, P. C. “H.-G. Gadamer’s Heideggerian Interpretation of Plato” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 12(1981):211-30.
¾¾¾ . “Plato as Impluse and Obstacle in Gadamer’s Development of a Hermeneutical Theory” in Gadamer and Hermeneutics(Routledge,1991),pp.23-41.
Sullivan, R. R. Political Hermeneutics(The Pennsylvania State University Press,1989).
Wachterhauser, B. R.Beyond Being: Gadamer;s Post-Platonic Hermeneutical Ontology(Northwestern University Press,1999)
¾¾¾ .ed.Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy(State University of New York Press1986).
Weinsheimer, J. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics : A Readings of Truth and Method(Yale University Press,1985).
Zuckert, Catherine H. PostmodernPlatos:Nietzche,Heideggger,Gadamer,Strauss,Derrida(The University of Chicago Press,1996).

二、中文著作
洪鐮德,《當代政治社會學》(台北:五南出版社,二版,2013)。
洪漢鼎,〈貝蒂關於解釋的方法論原則及其與伽達默爾的爭論〉《社會理論學報》第4卷第2期,香港理工大學,2001年,頁227-57。new window
洪漢鼎主編,《理解與闡釋-詮釋學經典論文集》(北京:東方出版社,2001)。
高宣揚著《解釋學簡論》(台北:遠流出版,1994)。
張鼎國,〈『書寫誌異』與『詮釋求通』:一場南轅北轍的哲學對話〉《東吳哲學學報》第3期,(1998.04),頁179-207。new window
¾¾¾ .〈「較好地」還是「不同地」理解:從詮釋學論爭看經典注疏中的詮釋定位與取向問題〉,《中國史哲通訊》第9卷第3期(1993年3月),頁87-109。
張旺山《狄爾泰》(台北:東大圖書公司,1986)。
陳榮華《思考與存有》(輔仁大學出版社,1992)。
海德格(M. Heidegger)原著,《存在與時間》,王慶節,陳嘉映譯 (台北:桂冠出版社,1994)。
¾¾¾ . 《走向語言之途》,孫周興譯 (台北:時報文化出版,1997)。
¾¾¾ . 《海德格爾選集》全兩冊,孫周興編選,熊偉等譯 (上海:三聯書局,1997)。
¾¾¾ . 〈回到形而上學基礎之路〉,收於《存在主義哲學》,考夫曼(W. Kaufmann)原編譯,陳鼓應等譯 (台北:商務印書館,1993),頁257-275。
胡賽爾(E. Husserl )原著,《純粹現象學通論》,李幼蒸譯 (北京:商務印書館,1996)。
¾¾¾ . 倪梁康編選,李幼蒸等譯《胡賽爾選集》全兩冊(上海:三聯書局,1997)。
劉小楓、陳少民主編,《施萊爾馬赫的柏拉圖》,(華夏出版社,2008)。
彭文林,(從柏拉圖研究的幾個趨勢談《苔艾苔投斯篇》(Theaetetos)的論題:什麼是知識) 《東海哲學研究集刊》第17集,2012 頁201-21new window
¾¾¾ .〈柏拉圖未成書之研究〉《鵝湖學誌》No.38,頁197-222。
¾¾¾ .《柏拉圖《克拉梯樓斯篇》譯注》,(台北:聯經,1992年3月)
費勃(Rafael Ferber)著,《哲人的無知》,王師譯(北京:華夏出版社,2010)。
孫周興、孫善春編譯,《德法之爭:伽達默爾與德里達的對話》 (上海:同濟大學出版社,2004)。二手文獻可參考:
帕瑪(Palmer)原著,嚴平譯《詮釋學》(台北:桂冠出版,1995)。
耀斯(H. R. Jauss)原著,張樂天等譯《審美經驗與文學解釋學》(上海譯文出版社,1997)。






 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE