:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區單親戶之貧窮:以1998年為例
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:薛承泰 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsueh, James Chernt-tay
出版日期:2000
卷期:2
頁次:頁151+153-189
主題關鍵詞:單親戶相對貧窮等成人單位貧窮線絕對貧窮Absolute povertyAdult-equivalence scalePoverty lineRelative povertySingle-parent household
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(20) 博士論文(6) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:18
  • 共同引用共同引用:174
  • 點閱點閱:56
本硏究採用1998年主計處家庭收支調查資料,分析一般家戶與單親戶之數量與比例,並比較不同家戶型態之「貧窮」現象。尤其是採用不同貧窮之測量(包括官方貧窮線、相對貧窮、等成人單位相對貧窮)來探討此議題,並將重點置於單親戶貧窮之分析。本硏究比較了四種主要單親戶(未婚、離婚、喪偶與分居)之貧窮率,並進一步採用多變項分析(邏輯迴歸),檢驗人力資本、勞動力市場與家庭結構對貧窮之解釋。 按官方貧窮線為標準,台灣地區有5.56%家戶落入貧窮,其中單親戶貧窮率為10.49%,是單人戶的三倍,是雙親戶的二倍餘。若以未加權與等成人加權之相對貧窮為準,單親戶之貧窮率分別為12.35%與8.85%。比較不同類型單親戶,不論用哪一種貧窮測量,都以喪偶之單親戶貧窮比例最高,離婚之單親戶其次;以性別區分,則以女喪偶單親戶與男離婚單親戶之經濟狀況最差。 針對一般家戶多變項分析結果,除了證實一般以人力資本、勞動力市場、家庭型態與組成對家戶貧窮的解釋外,更指出在教育、工作性質、家庭依賴人口等條件控制下,單親戶仍具有較高的機率落入貧窮的情形。最後,針對單親戶樣本的分析中,發現只有教育與依賴子女數對貧窮產生顯著的效應。這隱含一個現象,即單親戶雖較一般雙親戶易落入貧窮,但單親家長教育程度低與扶養子女多,才是經濟匱乏的主要因素。
There are several research purposes in this paper: 1) to estimate the most recent amount of single-parent households in Taiwan under a strict definition that only parents of divorced, separated, widowed or out-of-wedlock birth living with children are under considerations; 2) to investigate the poverty of single-parent families using three different measures derived from the official poverty line, the unweighted relative poverty and the relative poverty weighted by adult-equivalence scale, separately; 3) to compare poverty rates among different household patterns as well as among detail single-parent household types; 4) to estimate the effects on poverty using variables including gender, schooling and job status of household heads, as well as the number of dependent children and aged persons in the households; 5) to analyze the differential effects on poverty within single-parent families of both sexes. This paper concludes that the poverty rate of single-parent households is considerably higher than that of other household patterns, regardless of poverty measurements being used. There is no sign of economic worsen for female than male of lone-parent- household heads in Taiwan in 1998. Households headed by female widowers and by divorced males have experienced highest rates of poverty among all types of single-parent households. Finally, the results from multivariate analyses indicate that schooling and dependent family members are crucial factors in explaining to be poor for single-parent households.
期刊論文
1.Pearce, Diane(1978)。The Feminization of Poverty: Women, Work and Welfare。Urban and Social Change Review,11(1/2),28-36。  new window
2.張清富(1992)。貧窮類別差異的決定因素。法商學報,26,147-164。  延伸查詢new window
3.Duncan, G. J.、Saul, D. H.(1985)。A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital disruption。Demography,22,485-498。  new window
4.Bianchi, Suzanne M.(1999)。Feminization and Juvenilization of Poverty: Trends, Relative Risks, Causes, and Consequences。Annual Review of Sociology,25,307-333。  new window
5.呂朝賢(19960900)。貧窮女性化與貧窮程度的性別差異。人文及社會科學集刊,8(2),221-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Richards, L. N.、Schmiege, C. J.(1993)。Problems and strengths of single-parent families: Implications for practice and policy。Family Relations,42(3),277-285。  new window
7.Piachaud, David(1987)。Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Poverty。Journal of Social Policy,16(2),147-164。  new window
8.Orshansky, M.(1963)。Children of the poor。Social Security Bulletin,26(7),3-13。  new window
9.呂朝賢(19950400)。貧窮的性別與婚姻屬性差異。婦女與兩性學刊,6,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林松齡(19800900)。臺灣中部地區貧窮現象之研究--臺中市低收入戶專案研究。臺灣銀行季刊,31(3),189-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳建甫(19960900)。臺灣相對貧窮家戶的現況與變遷。社區發展季刊,75,95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭麗珍(19990500)。女性單親家庭的資產累積與世代傳遞過程。臺大社會工作學刊,1,111+113-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.謝美娥(19981000)。臺灣女性單親家庭的類型、「人力」資源與居住安排之初探。國立政治大學社會學報,28,117-152。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐良熙、張英陣(19870500)。臺灣的單親家庭:問題與展望。中國社會學刊,11,121-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.張英陣、彭淑華(19960300)。從優勢的觀點論單親家庭。東吳社會工作學報,2,227-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.薛承泰(19960400)。臺灣地區單親戶的數量、分佈與特性:以1990年普查為例。人口學刊,17,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.呂朝賢(19950600)。近十年來臺灣省各縣市貧窮率變化的影響因素。臺灣銀行季刊,46(2),252-272。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.薛承泰、簡文吟(19970600)。再就業婦女的職業流動初探。人口學刊,18,67-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.李淑容(19960300)。由中美貧窮線現制之檢討論我國貧窮線之研擬。東吳社會工作學報,2,161-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.McLanahan, S. S.、Sorensen, A.、Waston, D.(1989)。Sex Differences in Poverty, 1950-1980。Journal of Women in Culture Society,15(1),102-122。  new window
21.Meyer, D. R.、Garasky, S.(1993)。Custodial fathers: Myths, realities, and child support policy。Journal of Marriage and the family,55,73-89。  new window
22.Mincer, Jacob、Polachek, Solomon(1974)。Family Investment in Human Capital: Earnings of Women。Journal of Political Economy,82(2),S76-S108。  new window
23.Tilly, Chris、Randy Albelda(1994)。Family Structure and Family Earnings: The Determinants of Earnings Differences among Family Types。Industrial Relations,33(2),151-167。  new window
24.朱雲鵬(1987)。貧窮問題之探討:台灣地區資料之因素分解研究。中研院三民主義研究所專題選刊,71,1-40。  延伸查詢new window
25.陳建甫(1996)。影響地區相對貧窮率因素之研究:以1984至1994年台灣縣市地區爲例。社區發展季刊,76,195-213。  延伸查詢new window
26.楊家偉(1977)。台灣省貧窮問題之成因與減輕策略之研究。台灣銀行季刊,28(1),158-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Duncan, G. J.、Rodgers, W. L.(1988)。Longitudinal Aspects of Childhood Poverty。Journal of Marriage and the Family,50,1007-1021。  new window
28.McLanahan, S. S.、Garfinkel, I.(1989)。Single Mother, the Underclass, and Social Policy。Annals, AAPSS,501,92-104。  new window
會議論文
1.Huang, C. C.、黃建忠、薛承泰(1998)。Single-Parent Families in Taiwan: Evidence from 1989-1994。台北。  new window
研究報告
1.林萬億、秦文力(1992)。台北市單親家庭問題及其因應策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣省主計處(1997)。台灣省家庭收支調查報吿。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉淑娜(1985)。寡婦家庭的支持系統與生活適應(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂寶靜(1979)。臺北市婦女離婚後社會調適之硏究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪秋月(1987)。單親婦女的支持系統與生活適應之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂朝賢(1998)。臺灣的貧窮問題(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉美惠(2000)。台灣的單親家庭與其貧窮原因之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.童小珠(1992)。台灣省女性單家庭經濟困境之研究。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭麗珍(1988)。低收入戶單親女性戶長的角色負荷和社會支持網絡之相關研究。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Garfinkel, I.、McLanahan, S. S.(1986)。Single Mothers and Their Children。Washington, D. C.:Urban Institute Press。  new window
2.Reskin, Barbara F.(1984)。Sex segregation in the work place: trends, explanations, remedies。Washington, DC:National Academic Press。  new window
3.Gordon, David M.(1972)。Theories of Poverty and Unemployment。Lexington, MA.:D. C. Heath and Company。  new window
4.Ruggles, Patricia(1990)。Drawing the Line: Alternative Poverty Measures and Their Implications for Public Policy。Washington, DC:The Urban Institute Press。  new window
5.Mingione, E.(1996)。Urban Poverty And The Underclass - A Reader。Cambridge。  new window
6.Piorce, Michael J.(1971)。The Dual Labor Market: Theory and Implications。Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective \\ P. M. Gordon (ed.)。Lexington, Mass.。  new window
7.Townsend, Peter(1974)。Poverty as Relative Deprivation: Resources and Style of Living。Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure \\ Dorothy Wedderburn (ed.)。London。  new window
8.U.S. Bureau of the Census(1983)。Current Population Survey。Washington, D. C.。  new window
9.Weitzman, L.(1985)。The Divorce Revolution。:。New York。  new window
10.陳琇惠(1986)。訂定貧窮線之方式與標準之探討。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.England, Paula、Lori McCreary(1987)。Gender Inquality in Paid Employment。Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research。  new window
12.Garfinkel, I.、McLanahan, S. S.(1987)。The Feminization of Poverty: Nature, Causes and a Partial Cure。Poverty and Social Welfare in the United States \\ Donald Tomaskovic-Devey (ed.)。Boulder, CO.。  new window
13.Hagenaars, Aldi(1991)。The Definition and Measurement of Poverty。Economic Inequality and Poverty International Perspectives \\ Lars Osberg (ed.)。London。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bane, Mary Jo(1986)。Household Composition and Poverty。Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn't。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.王德睦、呂朝賢(1997)。人口老化與貧窮率。人口老化與老年照護。中華民國人口學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE