:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:恐慌症病患接受認知行為團體心理治療之歷程分析
書刊名:護理研究
作者:石芬芬王郁茗 引用關係賴德仁陳登義
作者(外文):Shih, Fen-fenWang, Yu-mingLai, Te-jenChen, Teng-yi
出版日期:2001
卷期:9:3
頁次:頁289-299
主題關鍵詞:恐慌症病患認知行為治療團體動力與發展Patient with panic disorderCognitive-behavioral therapyGroup dynamic and group development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:42
     本研究旨在探討治療者與成員的口語互動行為關係及團體互動模式;應用同質性策略,選取在中部某醫學中心接受精神科門診治療之六名病患為研究對象,徵得同意後施予為期十二週的封閉式團體心理治療;資料以錄音方式收集後轉譯,再根據Hill互動矩陣進行同時性三角交叉檢視法(simultaneous triangulation),以分析恐慌症病患接受認知行為治療之團體動力發展歷程。結果發現:團體治療者與成員的互動行為關係分別呈現上下起伏波動。而團體歷程之發展可分為:初期—適應與熟悉階段、中期—探索階段及後期—生產與製造階段,其中又以第三象限的口語行為參與量最多。在團體互動行為模式中,治療者之行為類別以探討團體成員的個人問題居多,以日常說話或提供支持的溝通方式居次;而成員的行為類別亦以談論個人的問題為主,顯示團體治療者與成員的口語行為相當一致;另外團體治療者與成員的互動行為類型方面,在內容型態上以成員中心為主,在工作型態上則達工作前階段,顯示團體對成員的治療價值頗有幫助。
     The study explores the verbal interaction relationship between therapists and members, and the interaction model of this group. Six subjects were chosen by convenience sampling from the psychiatric OPD of a medical center in the Taichung area. Subjects with informed consent participated in a 12-week course of closed group psychotherapy. All data was tape-recorded and the Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) scale was applied for simultaneous triangulation, in order to analyze the group's dynamic development of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for patients with panic disorder. The results indicated that the interactive relationship between therapists and members fluctuated during the group process. Development of the group process can be subdivided into three stages: initial stage-adaptive and familiar, middle stage-explorative, and terminal stage-productive. The amount of verbal interaction was greatest in the third quadrant. In the group interaction model, the therapist tended to explore the members' problems most. Providing support was the second most frequent. Meanwhile, members also tended to discuss personal problems. It was revealed that the verbal interaction of the therapists and members were the same. The content style of this group session is member-centered, and work style is pre-worked. The results showed that the group sessions did have great therapeutic value for members.
期刊論文
1.李玉嬋(1995)。小團體輔導的歷程及其產生的有效治療因素。諮商與輔導,109,6-12。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡錦標、彭素玲(19970600)。恐慌症團體治療--從臨床到全國性自助團體。中華團體心理治療,3(2),4-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.潘正德、陳清泉、王海苓、鄧良玉、陳成鳳(19950400)。大學生團體諮商歷程中的口語互動行為分析及影響團體效果相關因素之研究。中原學報,23(2),43-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Clark, D. M.(1986)。A cognitive approach to panic。Behavior Research and Therapy,24(4),461-470。  new window
5.潘正德(19961200)。Hill口語互動行為與團體效果之關係暨相關因素之研究--以家庭探索團體為例。中華輔導學報,4,203-257。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳若璋、李瑞玲(19870600)。團體諮商與治療研究的回顧評論。中華心理衛生學刊,3(2),179-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Hill, W. F.(1977)。Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM): The Conceptual Frame Work Derived Rating Scales, and an Updated Bibliography。Small Group Behavior,8(3),251-268。  new window
8.Lonborg, S. D.、Daniels, J. A.(1991)。Counselor and client verbal response mode changes during initial counseling session。Journal of Counseling Psychology,38(3),394-400。  new window
9.Goisman, R. M.、Warshaw, M. G.、Keller, M. B.(1999)。Psychosocial treatment prescriptions for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social phobia, 1991-1996。The American Journal of Psychiatry,156(11),1819-1821。  new window
10.Bystritsky, A.、Maidenberg, E.、Craske, M. G.(1995)。Brief cognitive-behavioral versus nondirective therapy for Panic disorder。Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,26(2),113-120。  new window
11.賴德仁(1996)。簡介恐慌症及臺中中山醫院之團體心理治療。愛心會會訊,9,12-13。  延伸查詢new window
12.簡錦標(1996)。恐慌症最新之發展。愛心會會訊,9,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
13.Barlow, D. H.、Gorman, J. M.、Shear, M. K.、Woods, S. W.(2000)。Cognitive-behavioral therapy, imipramine, or their combination for panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial。JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association,283(19),2529-2536。  new window
14.Fuhriman, A. F.、Packard, T.(1986)。Group process instruments: Therapeutic themes and issues。International Journal Group Psychotherapy,36(3),399-425。  new window
15.Robins, L. N.、Helzer, J. E.、Weissman, M. M.、Robins, L.、Helzer, J.、Weissman, M.、Orvaschel, H.、Gruenberg, E.、Burke, J.、Regier, D.(1984)。Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites。Archives of General Psychiatry,41,949-958。  new window
16.Jauquet, C. A.、Kivlighan, D. M.(1990)。Quality of group member agendas and group session climate。Small Group Research,21(2),205-219。  new window
17.Michelson, L.、Marchione, K.、Greenwald, M.(1990)。Panic disorders: Cognitive-behavioral treatment。Behavior Research Therapy,28(4),141-151。  new window
學位論文
1.謝麗紅(1995)。成長團體過程與團體效果之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何長珠(1997)。心理團體的理論與實際。臺北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏麗敏、黃德祥(1997)。諮商理論與技術。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Corey, G.、Corey, M.(1992)。Group: Process and practice。Pacific Grove, CA:Books/ Cole。  new window
4.Gladding, S. T.(1991)。Group work: A counseling specialty。New York:Merrill。  new window
5.Shaw, Marvin E.(1981)。Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill:Harper & Row。  new window
6.Meichenbaum, D. H.(1977)。Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
7.Forsyth, Donelson R.(1990)。Group dynamics。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
8.Yalom, Irvin D.(1995)。The theory and practice of group psychotherapy。Basic Books。  new window
9.劉安真(1995)。團體動力、治療性力量與團體歷程。團體諮商-策略與技巧。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Woods, N. F.、Catanzaro, M.(1992)。Nursing Research。Nursing Research。St. Louis:Mosby。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE