臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：政治轉型過程中的婦女運動：以運動者及其生命傳記背景為核心的分析取向
書刊名：臺灣社會學
作者：范雲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fan, Yun
出版日期：2003
卷期：5
頁次：頁133-194
主題關鍵詞：運動者生命傳記背景；婦女運動；組織劇碼；政治機會結構；社會運動；Activists' biographical backgrounds；Women's movement；Organizational repertoires；Political opportunity structure；Social movement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 歷年統計：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(30) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(6)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:30
  • 共同引用共同引用:647
  • 點閱點閱:342
　　　　　過去的社會運動研究強調政治機會結構對於運動的組織與策略的影響，卻忽略了這樣的影響，是透過行動者及其生命記背景，在環境的限制下所主動選擇的。本文以運動者的調查資料為主指出：組織劇碼、議題與策略皆不是中性的。不同生命傳記背景的運動者會傾向選擇不同的組織模式，這些選擇也會回過來影響運動者的組成，進而影響運動的議題與策略。八○年代臺灣婦女運動的先有者著教育、階級的優勢與特殊的族群構成，嫽們選擇基金會等無須草根動員的組織模式，使得其運動路線偏向社會服務、立法與文化宣傳。九○年代新進的運動者及其不同的生命傳記背景與新的組織模式，是推動婦女運動在變遷的政治環境中的新動力。因此，九○年代後期的性政治爭議與政黨認同的衝突，可以被視為是運動者不同的生命傳記背景與政治機會結構的互動，所產生的結果。
　　　　　Most studies on social movements fail to adequately explain through what kind of mechanisms changing political opportunities influence social movements. I believe that an important reason is that inadequate attention has been given to the role of activists and their biographical backgrounds. Using quantitative survey data and interviews with activists in Taiwan's women's movement, the author explains the trajectory of that movement during Taiwan's democratic transition. The central argument consists of two parts. First, the activists' biographical backgrounds played an important role in shaping the movement's organizational repertoire, tactics, and choice of issues. Specifically, the activists' biographical backgrounds influenced the choice to use organizational models that did not require grass roots mobilization (e.g., publishing houses, social service organizations, and foundations), yet they also developed a party-neutral lobbying strategy to accompany the emphasis on social service and cultural advocacy. Second, changing political opportunities, especially the shift from authoritarianism to democracy, should not be considered a neutral factor among activists form different backgrounds. Consequently, activists should be viewed as the primary intervening variable impacting the movement's interactions with changing political opportunities.
期刊論文
1.朱元鴻(19980600)。娼妓研究的另類提問。臺灣社會研究，30，1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王蘋、丁乃非、倪家珍、隋炳珍(19980300)。誰的基金會、什麼樣的運動？--夾在歷史和社會變革關口上的「婦女新知」。當代，9=127，90-96。  延伸查詢new window
3.Swidler, Ann(1986)。Culture in Action :Symbol and Strategies。American Sociological Review，51，273-286。  new window
4.Taylor, Verta(1989)。Social Movement Continuity: The Women's Movement in Abeyance。American Sociological Review，54(5)，761-775。  new window
5.何春蕤(19980100)。女性主義的色情／性工作立場。性/別研究，1/2，200-239。  延伸查詢new window
6.Goodwin, Jeff、Jasper, James M.、Khattra, Jaswinder(1999)。Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory。Sociological Forum，14(1)，27-54。  new window
7.林鶴玲、李香潔(19991200)。臺灣閩、客、外省族群家庭中之性別資源配置。人文及社會科學集刊，11(4)，475-528。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃淑玲(19960400)。臺灣特種行業婦女：受害者？行動者？偏差者？。臺灣社會研究季刊，22，103-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊，29(2)，117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李元貞(1991)。一個憤怒與憂傷的心路歷程：臺灣婦運與婦女研究。婦女新知，111，7-9。  延伸查詢new window
11.林芳玫(19980600)。當代臺灣婦運的認同政治：以公娼存廢爭議為例。中外文學，27(1)=313，56-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.顧燕翎(19960800)。從移植到生根：婦女研究在臺灣（1985-1995）。近代中國婦女史研究，4，241-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.簡家欣(19980600)。九０年代臺灣女同志的認同建構與運動集結：在刊物網絡上形成的女同志新社群。臺灣社會研究季刊，30，63-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳乃德(19971200)。檳榔和拖鞋，西裝及皮鞋：臺灣階級流動的族群差異及原因。臺灣社會學研究，1，137-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1983)。The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields。American Sociological Review，48(2)，147-160。  new window
16.Abdulhadi, R.(1998)。The Palestinian Women's Autonomous Movement: Emergence, Dynamics, and Challenges。Gender & Society，12(6)，649-673。  new window
17.Erni, J. N.、Spires, A. J.(2001)。Glossy Subjects: G & L Magazine and Gay, Lesbian, and Tongzhi Cultural Visibility in Taiwan。Sexuality，4(1)，25-49。  new window
18.Minkoff, D. C.(1997)。Producing Social Capital: National Social Movements and Civil Society。American Behavioral Scientist，40(5)，606-619。  new window
19.Tarrow, S.(1999)。Paradigm Warriors: Regress and Progress in the Study of Contentious Politics。Sociological Forum，14(1)，71-77。  new window
20.Whittier, N.(1997)。Political Generations, Micro-cohorts, and the Transformation of Social Movements。American Sociological Review，62(5)，760-778。  new window
會議論文
1.李安妮(1998)。從社會政治議題分析臺灣婦女團體的女性主義。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.張雅惠(1999)。自主性婦女組織的崛起－婦運的轉捩點。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
3.Koopmans, R.(1990)。Bridging the Gap: The Missing Link between Political Opportunity Structure and Movement Action。Madrid。  new window
4.Meyer, D. S.、Minkoff, D. C.(1997)。Operationalizing Political Opportunity。沒有紀錄。  new window
學位論文
1.范雲(2000)。Activists in a Changing Political Environment : A Microfoundational Study of Social Movements in Taiwan's Democratic Transition, 1980s-1990s(博士論文)。Yale University。  new window
2.王采薇(1997)。Feminism and the Formation of Collective Identity within the Women's Movement in Contemporary Taiwan(-)。  new window
3.張輝潭(1995)。台灣當代婦女運動與女性主義實踐初探--一個歷史的觀點(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Tilly, Charles(1986)。The Contentious French。The Contentious French。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Mansbridge, J.(1986)。Why We Lost The ERA。Chicago：University of Chicago。  new window
3.McAdam, Douglas(1988)。Freedom Summer。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Luker, Kristin(1984)。Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。  new window
5.Tilly, Charles(1978)。From Mobilization to Revolution。Michigan：Addison-Wesley。  new window
6.何明修(2005)。社會運動概論。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1989)。Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics。New York：The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.。  new window
8.王雅各(19990000)。臺灣婦女解放運動史。臺北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The interpretation of cultures。Harper & Row。  new window
10.張茂桂、吳介民、楊靜文、陳維新(1989)。社會運動與政治轉化。國家政策研究資料中心 (政研中心)。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.羅燦瑛(1997)。性（別）規範的論述抗爭－A片事件的新聞論述分析。性別研究的新視野。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Clemens, E.(1997)。The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925。The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925。Chicago, IL。  new window
13.Evans, S. M.(1980)。Personal Politics: The Roots of Women's Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement and the New Left。Personal Politics: The Roots of Women's Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement and the New Left。New York, NY。  new window
14.Gelb, J.、Palley, M.(1982)。Women and Public Policy。Women and Public Policy。Princeton。  new window
15.McCarthy, J. D(1996)。Constraints and Opportunities in Adopting, Adapting, and Inventing。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements。Cambridge。  new window
16.Minkoff, D. C.(1995)。Organizing for Equality: the Evolution of Women's and Racial-Ethnic Organizations in America, 1955-1985。Organizing for Equality: the Evolution of Women's and Racial-Ethnic Organizations in America, 1955-1985。New Jersey。  new window
17.Noonan, R. K.(1997)。Women Against the State: Political Opportunities and Collective Action Frames in Chile's Transition to Democracy。Social Movements: Readings on Their Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics。沒有紀錄。  new window
其他
1.謝小芩，Chueh, Chang(2002)。The Development of the Women's Movement and Women's/ Gender Studies in Taiwan，沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Kurzman, C.(2002)。The Post-Structuralist Consensus in Social-Movement Theory，Chapel Hill。  new window
圖書論文
1.McAdam, Doug(1997)。Toward an Integrated Perspective on Social Movements and Revolutions。Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.顧燕翎(1996)。婦女運動與公共政策的互動關係--墮胎合法化和平等工作權策略分析。台灣的國家與社會。台北：東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Zald, Mayer N.(1996)。Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.周碧娥、姜蘭虹、徐正光、宋文里(1989)。現階段臺灣婦女運動的經驗。臺灣新興社會運動。臺北：巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.McAdam, Doug(1996)。Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.王甫昌(1999)。社會運動。社會學與台灣社會。臺北：高雄：巨流：麗文。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.范雲(20000000)。從政治人到階級人：台灣政治轉型過程中的工運領導。臺灣的社會福利運動。臺北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.游鑑明(20000000)。臺灣地區的婦運。近代中國婦女運動史。臺北：近代中國出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.范雲(20030000)。連結運動者與變動的政治機會結構 : 八○年代到九○年代台灣民主轉型過程中社會運動參與者的個案研究。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北：新自然主義。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.McAdam, Doug、McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1996)。Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Process-toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.張毓芬、張茂桂(20030000)。從公娼事件看台灣反對運動與國族問題。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北：新自然主義。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1541（臺灣：1499，外國：42） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2295757 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：83608040
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上