Penalties, no matter principal pena1ties, accessory pena1ties or ,punishment which deprive the rights of the body or property, are ,involved in defendants' constitutional rights. Thus, the fitness on ,the imposition of the pena1ties is always an important index that ,reflects the level of a country's human right. The fitness of the ,penalties also symbolizes as the powerful touchstone for human rights ,protection. Confiscation not only possesses the quality of accessory ,penalty, but also contains the “subordinate effect" of a crime. To ,achieve the goal of a legal state's penal code, and to meet the rule of a ,legal state's constitution that protects the property rights (and the ,existence rights) of the people, it is important to address the concept ,that confiscation owns the quality similar to punishment". In ,accordance with this philosophy, the imposition of punishment, in one ,way, should obey the principle that no one is punished twice for the ,same offense (The bar against double jeopardy) ,i.e., following the ,dual valuation prohibition principle and the sufficient valuation ,principle. In addition, when the judge or prosecutor declares ,“confiscation", they should consider whether their declaration of ,confiscation coincides with those legal state's principles, e.g., ,principle of proportionality, principle of a legally prescribed ,,,,punishment for a specified crime, clarity principle of law, humanity ,principle, principle of suiting punishment to crime (punishment in ,accordance with crime, balance between crime and punishment), etc.