:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:遺照與小像:明清時期鶯鶯畫像的文化意涵
書刊名:文與哲
作者:毛文芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Mao, Wen-fang
出版日期:2005
卷期:7
頁次:頁251-291
主題關鍵詞:鶯鶯畫像遺照小像西廂記明清時期A portrait of orioleYingyingA posthumous portraitA miniature portraitThe story of the western wingXixiang jiMing-qing dynasty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:129
  • 點閱點閱:96
明清《西廂記》刊本卷首多冠有鶯鶯畫像,提供讀者繽紛多姿的視覺經驗。本文細查鶯鶯畫像圖版,發現「鶯鶯遺照」與「雙文小像」是當時最流行的兩款題字。「遺照」集中在明代,「小像」多出於清代。明代鶯鶯像,多為端嚴的半身造型,低眉、蹙首、凝視、支頷,透過「遺照」題字強化悲劇性的詮釋,想像一個摯情憂鬱的紅顏。清代鶯鶯像,多為全身造型,擡手拈指、肢體迴旋,沖淡了抒情的意味,彷彿舞臺角色的再現。清代畫家仿照壁女畫構圖,並附刻題詩,創造了深具沙龍意義的「小像」,在視覺上呈現秉禮德莊的佳麗魅力。鶯鶯畫像圖面意涵的差異,顯示了兩代文人觀看/期待女性的意識有所不同,本文的論述希望能解釋一部份明清時期的性別思維與文化變貌。
The portrait of Oriole [Yingying] on frontispiece in story of the Western Wing (Xixiang ji) published in the Ming-Qing Dynasty often gives readers a floried visual impression. The study compared the Yingying in the posthumous portrait and the miniature portrait carefully and found out that the wtwo figures and related inscriptions were the most fashionable style at that period. The posthumous portrait can be seen frequently in the Ming Dynasty and the miniature portrait in the Qing Dynasty. The Yingying in the Ming Dynasty had a serious figure; her low-brow and frown look, i.e. she rested her chin on her hand looked very heavy-hearted. This bust was a tragic role. In particular the related inscription was absolutely sad. The Yingying in the Qing Dynasty had a charming figure; she raised her hand, held the fingers and turned her body that showed a sentimental role on the stage. This whole-length portrait was a beautiful traditional Chinese painting; the related inscription stressed the charm of dignity and elegance. The difference of the two portraits reveals the viewpoints of the two dynasties. They totally had diverse expectations to women. The study aims to explain part of the gender thinking and cultural feature in the Ming-Qing Dynasty.
學位論文
1.許文美(1996)。陳洪綬《張深之正北西廂祕本》版畫研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.石守謙(2001)。悅目:中國晚期書晝圖版篇。臺北:石頭出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1998)。仕女畫之美。臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
3.王驥德(1614)。新校注古本西廂記。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1999)。西廂記版刻圖錄。揚州市:江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社。  延伸查詢new window
5.林宗毅(1998)。西廂記二論。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.康正果(1991)。風騷與黯情--中國古典詩詞的女性研究。臺北:雲龍出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張宏生(2000)。明清文學與性別研究。南京:南京大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.王伯敏(1986)。中國版畫史。臺北:蘭亭書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.寒聲、賀新輝、范彪(1992)。西廂記新論--西廂記研究文集。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.高居翰(1997)。山外山--晚明繪畫(一五七〇-一六四四)。臺北:石頭出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.毛文芳(20010000)。物.性別.觀看:明末清初文化書寫新探。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.蔣星煜(1988)。西廂記考證。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊新、班宗華、聶崇正、高居翰、郎紹君、巫鴻(1999)。中國繪畫三千年。臺北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王季思(1981)。王實甫西廂記。西廂記董王合刊本。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE