:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:機械類科系學生對價值觀、刺激忍受力、調適方式與專業科目成績表現等因素之可能關連性個案研究
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:謝寥宸徐三權
作者(外文):Hsieh, Yi-chernHsu, Shan-chuan
出版日期:2006
卷期:25:2
頁次:頁13-22
主題關鍵詞:價值觀刺激忍受力調適方式ValueStimulus toleranceCoping behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:28
本文將就技職體系學生的價值觀、刺激忍受力、以及調適方式與學生成績表現做廣而淺的調查,並嘗試分析其間的交互關係。 研究發現主要有以下幾點:一、本研究將學生的價值觀概分為:腳踏實地型、功利主義型、漠不關心型、隨波逐流型,發現學生整體有越來越趨向功利主義的傾向。二、若以成績來分析,可以發現到成績名列前茅的學生多屬功利型,在調適方式的選擇上則會先以自我調節為主,順從現實為第二優先,且功利型的女生比起功利型的男生更為順從;成績其次的學生多為踏實型,以解決問題為第一優先,其次才是自我調節;冷漠型與從眾型成績分布則較為零散,而冷漠型的學生則多會先順從現實,也較有逃避現實的傾向;從眾型的學生,則以自我調節與順從現實的方式較多。三、升學自私立學校的學生對自己的行為較具有自主性。四、技職體系學生普遍的刺激忍受力是較為不夠的。五、技職體系男性比女性更踏實,更有主見;女性則稍為功利主義,且較能忍受挫折。六、配合價值觀來分析,可以發現到冷漠型與功利型的學生刺激忍受力較高,踏實型則趨中,從眾型則較為零散。七、技職體系的機械類科學生遇到困難時多趨向使用自我調適的方式,而較不會虛擲於負向發洩情緒。八、問卷中也發現,學生比起求取新知技術更為重視的是學歷的取得。 本研究約略的分析了現今技職體系機械科學生的心理層面,期對學者專家能供作參考,未來能使技職體系學生能有完善的心理層面來面對出社會後的種種挑戰。
The main purpose of this article is to do some simple and broad investigations for understanding the possible relationships or correlation about the students' grades, values, stimulus tolerance, and coping behaviors. The potential outcomes are described as below: 1.The mechanical students in institute of technology are becoming more utilitarian than before. 2. From students' grades point of view, most of the “A" grade students belongs to utilitarian-type. Self adjust is the first choice for their coping behaviors then following the reality. Utilitarian female are more reality than utilitarian male. “B" grade students are mostly of stable-type. Their coping behaviors are to solve problems first then they will choose self adjust as the second way. Accommodated-type and offish-type students have scattering grade distribution. And most of the offish-type students will not against the real world, escapism. Accommodated-type students are of either self adjust or accepting reality as their coping behaviors. 3. The independent behavior of the students who are graduated from private junior colleges is more obvious than others who are not from private school. 4. Senior college students can bear more stimulus tolerance than junior college students. They both, however, are generally not strong enough for lower than average value. 5. Male are more realistic and having their own opnions than female. Ladies are more capable for accepting frustrations and more utilitarian than boys do. 6. From value and stimulus tolerance point, offish-type or utilitarian-type students have more ability to carry stimulus. Stable-type students are at average level. Accommodated-type students have no accord tendency. 7. Students can self adjust their emotion properly. They can deal with it in a positive way. 8. Students are more interesting in getting the degree instead of learning new technologies. The research does a little work on mechanical engineering students in psychology. Hope it can have a few functions to improve the students' knowledge not only in technology but also in psychology to face the challenges coming from the society in the near future.
期刊論文
1.曹桂榮(19910300)。南區五專護生在精神科實習的壓力自我強度及調適行為的探討。美和護專學報,9,左1-50。  延伸查詢new window
2.齊隆鯤(19940600)。臺中地區大學生價值觀之研究。國立中興大學共同學科期刊,3,95-147。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳玫君(19950200)。影響五專生生涯決策能力及工作價值觀的相關因素之研究。臺南師院學生學刊,16,39-63。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊傑(19910000)。臺北市青少年生活意識與價值觀變遷之研究。輔仁學誌. 法管理學院之部,23,1-89。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊國樞(19930800)。我對大學及大學教育的基本理念與看法。律師通訊,167,23-28。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊國樞(19930700)。我對大學及大學教育的基本理念與看法。律師通訊,166,28-32。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱毅(19930400)。臺北巿大學生價值觀形成內涵之研究。臺北銀行月刊,24(4)=283,5-21。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭黎玲(19950200)。焦慮、自尊、內外控與高職生生涯決策、工作價值觀之相關研究。臺南師院學生學刊,16,22-38。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊朝祥(20010700)。知識經濟時代教育新主張。教育資料與研究,41,1-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Kobasa, Suzanne C.(1979)。Stressful Life Events, Personality, and Health: An Inquiry into Hardiness。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37(1),1-11。  new window
11.李華璋(19940600)。工作價值觀在生計諮商上的應用。輔導季刊,30(2),33-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王瑋(19890600)。臨床護理人員工作壓力感及其調適行為之研究。榮總護理,6(2),97-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張紹勳(19960900)。專校資管科學生價值觀、生活適應、自我強度與因應方式之研究。教育研究資訊,4(5),23-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Folkman, Susan、Lazarus, Richard S.(1988)。Coping as a mediator of emotion。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54(3),466-475。  new window
15.吳成豐(19940500)。人的心性、道德價值觀與行為間的關係之研究。靜宜管理學報,4,217-231。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.葉明華(1981)。生活壓力自我強度與現代性對心理健康的影響(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.彭秀玲(1986)。大學生的生活壓力和自我強度對心理健康的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Super, D. E.、Nevill, D. D.(1985)。The values scale。CA:Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
2.Super, D. E.(1970)。Manual for the Work Values Inventory。Chicago:Riverside Publishing Company。  new window
3.Rokeach, M.(1973)。The nature of human values。Macmillan Publishing Co.。  new window
4.Super, D. E.(1957)。The Psychology of Carer。Harper & Row。  new window
5.Hofstede, G.(1980)。Culture'€™s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
6.Lazarus, Richard S.、Folkman, Susan(1984)。Stress, Appraisal, and Coping。Springer。  new window
7.Holland, J. L.(1985)。Marking vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environment。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.Spielberger, C. D.、Jacobs, G. A.、Russell, S.、Crane, R. S.(1983)。Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale。Advances in personality assessment。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.楊國樞(1982)。當前大專青年的價觀念與生活態度。第四屆全國青年輔導委員會專輯。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jacob, P. E.、Flink, J. J.、Schuchman, H. L.(1962)。Values and their function in decision making。Study of Social Values and Public Policy。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania。  new window
4.Spielberger, C. D.(1972)。Stress and anxiety: An overview。Needed research on stress and anxiety a special report of the use-sponsored grant study: Critical appraisal of research in the personality emotion as-motivation domain。  new window
5.Kluckhohn, C. K. M.(1951)。Values and value Orientations in the theory of action: An Exploration in definition and classification。Toward a general theory of action。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Super, D. E.(1973)。The Work Values Inventory。Contemporary Approaches to Interest Measurement。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE