:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國憲政史上府院關係之探討以〈五五憲草〉、〈憲法本文〉、〈臨時條款〉與〈增修條文〉為例
書刊名:萬竅
作者:曾建元 引用關係許恒禎
作者(外文):Tseng, Chien-yuanHsu, Heng-cheng
出版日期:2007
卷期:5
頁次:頁55-76
主題關鍵詞:二元領導雙首長制半總統制府院關係Dual leadshipSemi-presidentialismPresident-premier relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:324
  • 點閱點閱:42
本文主要探討我國憲政史上不同憲法法典當中府院關係理念的演變,這些憲法法典包括了〈五五憲草〉、〈憲法〉本文、〈動員戡亂時期臨時條款〉以及〈增修條文〉。本文以憲法文本分析為主,事實資料補充為輔,期能描繪出當中府院關係的異同。文中先介紹與府院關係相關的概念:二元領導、雙首長制與半總統制,在釐清這三個相關聯但不同的概念後,再用以作制度分析。 在〈五五憲草〉中,總統同時擁有國家元首與行政首長的身分,但是同時也設置行政院長而不使總統負責一般日常政務,行政院長則由總統任免並對總統負責;〈憲法〉本文係依據修正式內閣制精神,令總統行使職權須有行政院長配合,而行政院長則為最高行政首長;〈臨時條款〉中,國家最高行政權力係向總統集中。現行〈增修條文〉則標舉半總統制,但總統直選後民主正當性大增與有權單獨任命行政院長,使總統在府院關係中仍保持優勢。但不論如何,我國不同時期憲法法典中的府院關係,皆具有二元領導的流動性與不對稱性特徵。
This paper is concerned about the President-premier relationship of some crucial constitution codes in R.O.C’s constitutional history . Those codes are the 1936 May 5 Constitution Draft, the main text of R.O.C. constitution, the Provisional Clauses and the Amendments of the R.O.C’s constitution . From a standpoint of analyzing these codes and some political facts , this paper portraits the comparison among those codes. Related concepts like “dual leadership”, “dual executive” and “semi-presidentialism” are also adopted to explain the President-premier relationship. The relationships of President-premier changes with time. In the 1936 May 5 Constitution Draft, the premier is appointed and dismissed by the president , and he takes charge of the routine executive affairs. In the main text of R.O.C. constitution, according to the spirit of refined parliamentary system, the premier is the highest executive chief of the state, and if the president wants to use his power from the constitution , he/she needs the support of the premier. In the Provisional Clauses, the president not only affords the power of setting new agencies but also acquires the right to run for consecutive presidencies if he wants. In the Amendments of the R.O.C’s constitution which is based on the semi-presidentialism, the president possesses higher democratic legitimacy by popularly voting and have the full power to appoint the premier by himself. To sum up , the president holds relative advantage of the dual leaders.
期刊論文
1.Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research,8(2),165-187。  new window
2.曾建元(2001)。〈我國修憲後憲政體制的爭議問題與因應對策〉。《立法院院聞月刊》,第三百三十七期。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾建元(2002)。一九九零年代台灣憲政改革之研究--民族主義與民主轉型的觀點(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾國允(1990)。我國現行憲法上二元領導型態之研究--析論總統之職權(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Shugart, Matthew S.、Carey, John M.、曾建元(2002)。總統與國會:憲政設計與選舉動力。台北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Loewenstein, K.(1957)。Political power and the government process。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Ranney, Austin(1985)。《政治學》。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.張君勱(1997)。中華民國民主憲法十講。臺北:洛克出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.徐正戎(2002)。法國總統權限之研究。台北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.荊知仁(1984)。中國立憲史。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.呂炳寬、徐正戎(20050000)。半總統制的理論與實際。臺北:鼎茂圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳玉山(20000000)。俄羅斯轉型1992-1999:一個政治經濟學的分析。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.曾建元(2004)。〈我國憲政應採內閣制或總統制或雙首長制?〉。青年Come 議台灣加力──2004 青年國是會議分區會議會前閱讀資料──議題三:如何推動憲政改革與促進青年公民權利?。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃昭元(2004)。九七修憲後我國中央政府體制的評估。憲改大對決--九七憲改的教訓。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE