臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：團隊創新之重要影響因素分析--灰色熵值權重與PROMETHEE法之運用
書刊名：中華管理學報
作者：徐聯恩 引用關係／洪敘峰 引用關係／盧亭均
作者(外文)：Hsu, Lien-an／Hung, Hsu-feng／Lu, Ting-chun
出版日期：2008
卷期：9:2
頁次：頁41-58
主題關鍵詞：團隊創新；灰色熵值權重；Spearman等級相關；PROMETHEE；Team innovation；Grey entropy weight；Spearman rank correlation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:89
  • 點閱點閱:46
影響團隊創新之因素眾多，傳統上研究者傾向於採用投入－歷程－產出(IPO)的結構來探討其因素影響過程。由歷史文獻中之敘述可大致可將影響因素分為團隊個人特性、團隊成員互動、團隊整體特性及組織影響等四個層次之因素層級。然而，若欲運用文獻中所提及之可能影響因素建立一影響團隊創新之結構模式，則各因素對於團隊創新影響關係之重要性考量是不可或缺的。因此，本研究之目的為利用灰色熵值權重與偏好結構順序法(Preference Ranking Organization Methods for Enrichment Evaluations; PROMETHEE)，以專家問卷進行資料蒐集，調查專家意見中各影響因素對於影響團隊創新之重要性。研究中整理歷史文獻中曾被提及對團隊創新產生影響之因素，共包含21個因素項目。而後，再採用平均權重、折衷權重、客觀權重、等級權重、等級倒數權重與比率權重等六種不同的權重計算方式，與灰色熵值權重之排序結果進行比較分析。再輔以簡單加權法(Simple Additional Weight; SAW)進行排序方法比較，並以Spearman等級相關係數檢定不同權重間之排序差異性，以利觀察各因素在不同排序方法與權重計算下的排序關係。最後，從21項因素項目中挑選出相對影響關係較重要且排序穩定的關鍵影響因素，作為本研究建議後續研究進行團隊創新結構模式建立時，應首要考慮的關鍵影響因素。
There are a number of factors that influence team innovation process, researchers in this domain area often adopt an Input-Process-Output (IPO) framework to explore those factors. Through a comprehensive review of the literature on the team innovation process, researchers usually divide those factors into four levels: t team innovation, team members' individual personality, team members' interaction and team's characteristic. While attempting to build an structural team innovation model, it is necessary for the researchers to investigate the importance and weigh each factor on its influence over team innovation.. The purpose of this study is to use the Preference Ranking Organization Methods for Enrichment Evaluations to collect the experts' opinions on 21 factors of team innovation in the previous researches. Throughout the investigation process,, we used average weight, eclectic weight, objective weight, reciprocal ranking weight, sum of ranking weight, and ratio weight with Grey Entropy weight to further conducting the analytic process analyze. In addition, we compare the ranking system by Simple Additional Weight (SAW), and use Spearman rank correlation coefficient to sort out the different rankings to observe the ranking of different ranking system and weight. Finally, this study selected a panel of relatively important and crucial factors out of 21 factors that are recommended to further researches for them to take into consideration while trying to construct the team innovation framework and extend into future research.
期刊論文
1.Tjosvold, D.、Tang, M. M. L.、West, M. A.(2004)。Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China: the Contribution of Goal Interdependence。Group & Organization Management，29(5)，540-559。  new window
2.Pitcher, P.、Smith, A. D.(2001)。Top management team heterogeneity: personality, power, and proxies。Organization Science，12(1)，1-18。  new window
3.Albadvi, A.(2004)。Formulating National Information Technology Strategies: A Preference Ranking Model Using PROMETHEE Method。European Journal of Operational Research，153，290-296。  new window
4.Brans, J. P.、Vincke, Philippe(1985)。A Preference Ranking Organization Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making。Management Science，31(6)，647-656。  new window
5.Brans, J. P.、Marechal, B.、Vincke, P.(1984)。PROMETHEE: A New Family of Outranking Methods in Multi-Criteria Analysis。Operational Research，84，477-490。  new window
6.Brans, J. P.、Vincke, P.、Marechal, B.(1986)。How to Select and How to Rank Project: The PROMETHEE Method。European Journal of Operation Research，24(2)，228-238。  new window
7.Briggs, T.、Kunsch, P. L.、Mareschal, B.(1990)。Nuclear Waste Management: The PROMETHEE Methods。European Journal of Operation Research，44，1-10。  new window
8.West, M. A.、Borrill, C. S.、Dawson, J. F.、Brodbeck, F.、Shapiro, D. A.、Haward, B.(2003)。Leadership Clarity and Team Innovation in Health Care。The Leadership Quarterly，14(4/5)，393-410。  new window
9.West, M. A.、Hirst, G.、Richter, A.、Shipton, H.(2004)。Twelve Steps to Heaven: Successfully Managing Change through Development Innovative Teams。European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology，13(2)，269-299。  new window
10.Carter, S. M.、West, M. A.(1998)。Reflexivity, Effectiveness, and Mental Health in BBC-TV Production teams。Small Group Research，29(5)，583-601。  new window
11.Chou, T. Y.、Lin, W. T.、Lin, C. Y.、Chou, W. C.、Huang, P. H.(2004)。Application of the PROMETHEE Technique to Determine Depression Outlet Location and Flow Direction in DEM。Journal of Hydrology，287，49-61。  new window
12.De Dreu, C. K. W.、West, M. A.(2001)。Minority Dissent and Te am Innovation: The Importance of Participation in Decision Making。Journal of Applied Psychology，86(6)，1191-1201。  new window
13.De Dreu, C. K. W.(2002)。Team Innovation and Team Effectiveness: The Importance of Minority Dissent and Reflexivity。European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology，11(3)，285-298。  new window
14.Hababou, M.、Martel, J. M.(1998)。A Multicriteria Approach for Selecting a Portfolio Manager。Information，36(3)，161-176。  new window
15.Kangas, J.、Kangas, A.、Leskinen, P.、Pykalainen, J.(2001)。MCDM Methods in Strategic Planning of Forestry on State-owned Lands in Finland: Applications and Experiences。Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis，10(5)，257-271。  new window
16.Keyser, W. D.、Peeters, P.(1996)。Theory and Methodology: A Note on the Use of PROMETHEE Multi-Criteria Methods。European Journal of Operational Research，89，457-461。  new window
17.Martin, C.(1997)。The New Information Technology-International Diffusion and Its Impact on Employment and Skills。International Journal of Manpower，18，119-159。  new window
18.Pavic, I.、Babic, Z.(1991)。The Use of the PROMETHEE Method in the Location Choice of a Production System。International Journal of Production Economics，23，165-174。  new window
19.Sagie, A.、Zaidman, N.、Amichai-Hamburger, Y.、Te'eni, D.、Schwartz, D. G.(2002)。An Empirical Assessment of the Loose-Tight Leadership Model: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses。Journal of Organizational behavior，23(3)，303-320。  new window
20.Barry, B.、Stewart, G. L.(1997)。Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-managed Groups: The Role of Personality。Journal of Applied Psychology，82(1)，62-78。  new window
21.Churchman, C. W.、Ackoff, R. L.、Smith, N. M. Jr.(1954)。An Approximate Measure of Value。Journal of the Operations Research Society of America，2(2)，172-187。  new window
22.Klee, A. J.(1971)。The Role of Decision Models in the Evaluation of Competing Environmental Heath Alternatives。Management Science，18(2)，B52-B67。  new window
23.Somech, Anit(2006)。The Effects of Leadership Style and Team Process on Performance and Innovation in Functionally Heterogeneous Teams。Journal of Management，32(1)，132-157。  new window
24.Campion, Michael A.、Medsker, Gina J.、Higgs, A. Catherine(19931200)。Relations between work group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups。Personnel Psychology，46(4)，823-850。  new window
25.黃家齊、黃荷婷(20060600)。團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響--一個多層次研究。管理學報，23(3)，327-346。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Janssen, Onne、Van de Vliert, Evert、West, Michael(2004)。The Bright and Dark Sides of Individual and Group Innovation: A Special Issue Introduction。Journal of Organizational Behavior，25(2)，129-145。  new window
27.West, Michael A.(2002)。Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups。Applied Psychology: An International Review，51(3)，355-387。  new window
28.Lindsley, D. H.、Brass, D. J.、Thomas, J. B.(1995)。Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective。Academy of Management Review，20，645-678。  new window
29.Jehn, K. A.、Mannix, E. A.(2001)。The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance。Academy of Management Journal，44(2)，238-251。  new window
30.黃家齊、林億明(20060600)。團隊導向人力資源管理活動及社會資本對團隊知識分享與創新之影響。臺大管理論叢，16(2)，101-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Neuman, G. A.、Wright, J.(1999)。Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability。Journal of Applied Psychology，84(3)，376-389。  new window
32.Hoegl, M.、Gemuenden, H. G.(2001)。Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence。Organization Science，12(4)，435-449。  new window
33.黃家齊、蔡達人(20030600)。團隊多元化與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效。臺大管理論叢，13(2)，233-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.黃家齊、許雅婷(20060400)。團隊成員人格特質對知識分享及創新績效之影響--個人與團隊層次的分析。管理學報，23(2)，149-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Babic, Z.、Plazibat, N.(1998)。Ranking of Enterprises Based on Multicriterial Analysis。International Journal of Production Economics，56/57，29-35。  new window
36.Kivimäki, M.、Elovainio, M.(1999)。A short version of the team climate inventory: Development and psychometric properties。Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology，72，241-246。  new window
學位論文
1.湯令儀(2000)。知識分享網路之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Anderson, N. R.、West, M. A.(1994)。The Team Climate Inventory: Manual Users' Guide。Assessment Service for Employment, NFER-Nelson。  new window
2.West, M. A.、Farr, J. L.(1990)。Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Steiner, Ivan Dale(1972)。Group Processes and Productivity。New York：Academic Press。  new window
4.Hwang, Ching-Lai、Yoon, Kwangsun(1981)。Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey。Springer-Verlag。  new window
5.Yoon, K. Paul、Hwang, Ching-Lai(1995)。Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction。Sage。  new window
6.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Guzzo, R. A.、Shea, G. P.(1992)。Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations。Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology。Palo Alto, CA：Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：514（臺灣：509，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67863722
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上