:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國水泥業受傾銷前後之經營效率比較研究--DEA方法之應用
書刊名:華人前瞻研究
作者:余惠芳 引用關係黃玉娟姚文成 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Hui-funHuang, Yu-chuanYeuo, Wen-chen
出版日期:2008
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁53-80
主題關鍵詞:資料包絡分析法效率馬奎斯特生產力指數水泥業傾銷Data envelopment analysisEfficiencyMalmquist productivity indexCement industryDumping
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:213
  • 點閱點閱:163
台灣加入WTO後,面對市場的開放與自由競爭,傳統產業的競爭力與生存受到極大的挑戰,本研究以與日常民生息息相關的傳統產業-水泥業之8家上市公司做為研究對象,就水泥反傾銷銳課徵前後期間(1998年至2005年)進行產業的經營效率評估。此採用資料包絡分析法分析整個水泥產業與個別廠商於受傾銷前後期間之經營效率與效率變動及Malmquist生產力變動的情形,街量傾銷前後經營效率的表現。 整體水泥產業現況,其生產力與生產技術均有進步,且傾銷後較傾銷前佳。雖然其技術效率不彰,但在生產技術的大幅改善下,並不影響整體生產力的進步。另就技術效率觀察,整個研究期間之技術效率衰退,主因傾銷前純粹技術效率的退步與傾銷後規模效率的衰退所致。換言之,管理效率不彰、規模效率的衰退為技術效率衰退之主因。經實證發現此一因素係因廠商企業結構之改變,導致規模效率與技術效率為無效率所致。 整個研究期間與傾銷前水泥廠商之效率值中,具有效率的單位近1/3,無效率的單位有5個,這5個單位之平均效率值達99.1%,其經濟上之意義即多浪費了0.9%的資源。此外傾銷後之無效率的單位有6個,平均效率值達99.13%,其經濟之涵義為多浪費了0.87%的資源。可見即使傾銷後之無效率單位較傾銷前多,但在資源使用上,事實上是有改善的。傾銷後達成效率之廠商數雖較傾銷前減少,然而,就各項效率之改善度來看,傾銷後的這段期間確實大為提高。 影響水泥業經營效率的因素很多,而傾銷復之利得亦僅為原因之一,然本研究針對傾銷前後的財報數據以DEA進行分析之結果與水泥工會歷年的水泥銷售量作比較,發覺傾銷前後生產力的改善進步與生產數量有正向關係,因此,我國對國外傾銷的業者課以反傾銷稅,確實對我國水泥產業有正向的利益與成長。
Traditional industries, whose competitiveness and sustainability has encountered great challenges after Taiwan joined WTO, is facing tremendous pressure from market opening and free competition. In this regard, we chose 8 firms from Taiwan's cement industry that closely linked with people's livelihood to be the research objective. As cement industry has experienced the anti-dumping wave of the world and relevant lawsuit has been settled in Taiwan, this study evaluates the operational efficiency during the dumping period (from 1998 to 2005). In this paper, we utilize Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Productivity Index to analyze and detect the change of relative efficiency for both individual firms and cement industry as a whole, before and after anti-dumping duty was imposed during the aforementioned period. With respect to TFP and TEC indexes of the cement industry, the low total factor productivity (TFP) of the industry is caused by inefficiency in technology and production. According to the result from concrete diagnosis, we conclude that both TFP and TEC of the cement industry have significantly improved after anti-dumping duty was imposed. Although the technology used in cement industry is inefficient, both TFP and TEC are not affected. For EC index, technical efficiency of the cement industry declined due to technological inefficiency before dumping took place and deterioration in economy of scale after dumping occurred, which were resulted from the change in enterprise structure. Before dumping occurred, nearly 1/3 of the firms were operating efficiently, with 5 firms being inefficient. The avenge efficiency ratio of the 5 firms is 99.1%, indicating that 0.9% of the resource was wasted in economic terms. After dumping occurred, 6 inefficient firms were found, with average efficiency ratio slightly rose to 99.13%. Therefore, although the number of inefficient firms increased after dumping took place, the use of resources improved. The operational efficiency of cement industry can be affected by various factors, one of them being the gains from imposing anti-dumping duty. In this research, financial figures from the ment industry before and after dumping occurred were analyzed with DEA method to be compared with historical figures, and we conclude that improvements in productivity were positively correlated with the amounts of production. In summary, imposing anti-dumping duties to foreign dumping firms was in the interest of domestic cement industry.
期刊論文
1.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.(1984)。The Non-Archimedian CCR Ratio for Efficiency Analysis: Arejoinder to Body and Fare。International European Journal of Operationss Research,15,333-334。  new window
2.Zaima, J. K.、Turetsky, H. F.、Cochran, B.(2005)。The MVA-EVA Relationship: Separation of Market Driven Versus Firm Driven Effects。Review of Accounting & Finance,4(1),32-50。  new window
3.黃金瑞(20000500)。臺灣水泥工業之現況與展望。產業經濟,225,35-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡嘉倩(20010500)。水泥業之評價程序--以亞泥為例。貨幣觀測與信用評等,29,77-82。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hines, R. D.(1982)。The usefulness of annual Reports the Anomaly between the Efficient Markets Hypothesis and Share Hold Surveys。Accounting and Business Research,296-309。  new window
6.Muhamme, Mercan、Reisman, A.、Yolalan, R.、Emel, A. B.(2003)。The Effect of Scale and Mode of Ownership on the Fnancial Performance of the Turkish Banking Sector: Results of a DEA-based Analysis。Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,37,185-202。  new window
7.Banker, R. D.、Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Swarts, J.、Thomas, D. A.(1989)。An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses。Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting,5,125-163。  new window
8.Charnes, A.、Neralic, L.(1989)。Sensitivity Analysis in Data Envelop Analysis。Glasnik Mathematicki,24(44),221-226。  new window
9.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Lewin, A. Y.、Morey, R. C.、Rousseau, J.(1985)。Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA。Annals of Operations Research,2(1),139-156。  new window
10.黃智輝(20080300)。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析--臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,38(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Engert, F. M.(1995)。A Study of School District Efficiency in New York State using Data Envelopment Analysis。Dissertation Abstracts International,56(7),2502。  new window
12.Seiford, L. M.、Thrall, R. M.(1990)。Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis。Journal of Econometrics,46(1/2),7-38。  new window
13.Roll, Y.、Golany, B.、Seroussy, D.(1989)。Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in the Israeli Air Force。European Journal of Operational Research,43(2),301-317。  new window
14.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.(1962)。Programming with Linear Fractional Functions。Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,9(3/4),181-186。  new window
15.Pedraja-Chaparro, F.、Salinas-Jiménez, J.、Smith, P.(1999)。On the Quality of the Data Envelopment Analysis Model。Journal of the Operational Research Society,50(6),636-644。  new window
16.Aigner, Dennis J.、Lovell, Charles Albert Knox、Schmidt, Peter(1977)。Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models。Journal of Econometrics,6(1),21-37。  new window
17.Meeusen, Wim、Van Den Broeck, Julien(1977)。Efficiency Estimation From Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error。International Economic Review,18(2),435-444。  new window
18.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
19.Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。  new window
20.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurits R.、Diewert, W. Erwin(1982)。The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,50(6),1393-1414。  new window
21.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
22.Venkatraman, N.、Ramanujam, Vasudevan(1986)。Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches。Academy of Management Review,11(4),801-814。  new window
23.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
研究報告
1.Coelli, T. J.(1996)。A Guide to DEAP Version 2. 1: A Data Envelopment Analysis(Computer Program)。Armidale:Department of Econometrics, University of New England。  new window
學位論文
1.徐孟詩(2001)。我國新興科技產業經營績效之研究--以光電產業為例及財務分析之觀點(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪明暉(2001)。專業電子代工服務廠之經營效率與購併分析--DEA之應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱珮宏(2003)。台灣地區生技產業經營績效之研究--DEA方法與Malmquist生產力指數之應用(碩士論文)。佛光人文社會學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂詩虹(2004)。台灣水泥業市場獨占力之分析--加碼檢定法之應用(碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李朝彬(2003)。台灣資訊硬體廠商投資大陸對生產力影響之初探(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.莫海鳴(1988)。臺灣水泥業經營策略與經營績效之相關研究:PIMS分析法之實證應用(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.顏瑞志(2004)。台灣印刷電路板產業之營運及整合效率之研究---資料包絡分析法之應用(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.林安鎮(1982)。生產力-成本-獲利力網圖在經營績效評估之應用(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.洪海玲(2002)。以資料包絡分析法作製造業之營運效率分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉以德(2002)。企業營運績效、財務槓桿與研究發展費用之關聯性研究(以電子業為例)(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.馮秀鳳(2002)。半導體產業經營效率之研究--資料包絡分析法之應用(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄧朝貴(1994)。提升高科技公司生產力之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃智輝(2006)。世界貿易組織與進口救濟。台北:台北圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Drucker, P. R.(1963)。Peter Drucker on the Profession of Management。Commonwealth Publishing Co.。  new window
3.Drucker, P. F.(1999)。Management challenges for 21st Century。Commonwealth Publishing Co. Ltd.。  new window
4.Lisbeth, Funding laCour、Ivfollgaard, H. P.(2000)。Test of (abuse of) Domination: The Danish Cement Industry。Copenhagen Business School。  new window
5.Tone, Kaoru、Cooper, William Wager、Seiford, Lawrence M.(2000)。Data Envelopment Analysis--A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software。Boston, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
6.Norman, N.、Stoker, B.(1991)。Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
7.高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸(2003)。管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法。臺北:華泰文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Robbins, Stephen P.(1996)。Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, and Applications。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
其他
1.Zomorrodian, M. R.(1990)。Guidelines for improving efficiency in elementary schools in Western Massachusetts: A data envelopment analysis approach(90-35426)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Roller, II, R. H.、Weiss L. W.(1989)。Price Levels and Seller Concentration the Case of Portland Cement。Concentration and Price。Cambridge:MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE