臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：俄羅斯國會之發展剖析
書刊名：政治科學論叢
作者：許菁芸
作者(外文)：Hsu, Jing-yun
出版日期：2010
卷期：43
頁次：頁119-157
主題關鍵詞：俄羅斯聯邦；聯邦議會；聯邦院；國家杜馬；超級總統制；Russian Federation；Federal Assembly；Council of Federation；State Duma；Super-Presidentialism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:161
  • 點閱點閱:31
俄羅斯國會，全名為聯邦議會，為聯邦院和國家杜馬所組成。一九九三年十二月通過的俄羅斯憲法引進了三權分立、多黨制等典型西方憲政原則，但其根本精神卻是俄羅斯式，帶有俄羅斯傳統中的個人專權特色。直至二○○八年三月，俄羅斯憲政體制基本上維持了半總統制下的強勢總統格局，超黨派的強勢總統、無執政黨的多黨制、不成熟的政黨及人民不信任國會之心理因素，造就了「強總統─弱國會」框架下的聯邦院和國家杜馬。二○○八年俄羅斯總統普金卸任，旋即轉任總理並擔任國會最大黨─「統一俄羅斯」黨之黨主席，權力重心仍掌握在普金手中，故普金極力推動之俄羅斯國會歷來修正的「政黨法」與「國會杜馬議員選舉法」和普金未來之走向將關係到俄羅斯健全國會與政黨體制的建立。
The Federal Assembly is the legislative institution of the Russian Federation and consists of two chambers - the Council of Federation and the State Duma. Although the Constitution of Russian Federation which was adopted on December 12 1993 holds to a number of western classic constitutional principles (for example the separation of powers, a multiparty system, and so on), its fundamental nature is thoroughly Russian-rooted and it also integrates the characteristics of a conventionally Russian autarchy. Until March 2008, the Russian constitutional regime basically sustained a super-presidential system, with the presidency far more powerful than both the parliament and political parties. However, despite stepping down from the presidency, Vladimir Putin has managed to retain his preeminent position in Russian politics. In particular, the continuously-amended Russian Federation laws “On Political Parties” and “On the Election of Deputies to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation”, and Putin’s own ambiguous position, may have a dramatic impact upon the integrity of the parliament and the formation of the well-functioning party system.
期刊論文
1.趙竹成(20060100)。俄羅斯聯邦選舉制度與總統職權。問題與研究，45(1)，53-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.況正吉(19991100)。憲政制度與政治文化對俄羅斯民主鞏固的影響。問題與研究，38(11)，31-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李玉珍(19980200)。俄羅斯府會之爭的探討。問題與研究，37(2)，55-68+92。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許湘濤(19961200)。俄羅斯的政治發展--一九九○至一九九六。問題與研究，35(12)，29-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Elgie, Robert、Mcmenamin, Iain(2008)。Semi-Presidentialism and Democratic Performance。Japanese Journal of Political Science，9(3)，324-340。  new window
6.沈有忠(20040900)。半總統制下的權力集散與政府穩定--臺灣與威瑪共和的比較。臺灣民主季刊，1(3)，99-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.郭武平(19990800)。俄羅斯的憲政發展問題探討。問題與研究，38(8)，37-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Roper, Steven D.(2002)。Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier-Presidential Regimes。Comparative Politics，34(3)，253-272。  new window
9.畢英賢(19960400)。俄羅斯國會改選之研析。問題與研究，35(4)，28-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Elgie, Robert(20071200)。Varieties of Semi-Presidentialism and Their Impact on Nascent Democracies。Taiwan Journal of Democracy，3(2)，53-71。new window  new window
11.Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research，8(2)，165-187。  new window
12.吳玉山(20020100)。半總統制下的內閣組成與政治穩定--比較俄羅斯、波蘭與中華民國。俄羅斯學報，2，229-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王定士(2008)。〈俄羅斯 2007 國家杜馬與 2008 總統選舉之研析〉。《台灣東北亞研究》，冬季號，7-42。  延伸查詢new window
14.林永芳(2006)。〈俄羅斯政黨體系與民主化〉。《俄羅斯學報》，5，25-50。  延伸查詢new window
15.Holmes, Stephen.(1993)。Superpresidentialism and its Problems。East European Constitutional Review，2(4)，123-126.。  new window
16.Konitzer, Andrew and Stephen K. Wegren.(2006)。“Federalism and Political Recentralization in the Russian Federation: United Russia As the Party of Power.”。The Journal of Federalism，36，503-52。  new window
17.Ostrow, Joel.(1998)。“Procedural Breakdown and Deadlock in the RussianState Duma: The Problem of an Unlinked Dual-Channel Institution Design.”。Europe-Asia Studies，54(5)，793-816。  new window
18.Rose, Richard.(1995)。“Russia as an Hour-Glass Society: A Constitution Without Citizens.”。East European Constitutional，4(3)，34-42。  new window
19.Shugart, Matthew Soberg.(1996)。“Executive-Legislative Relations in Post-Communist Europe.”。Transition，2 (25):，6-11。  new window
圖書
1.O'Donnell, Guillermo、Schmitter, Philippe(1987)。Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
2.Fish, Steven(2005)。Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics。Cambridge UK：New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Shugart, Matthew S.、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamic。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Lijphart, Arend(1992)。Parliamentary versus Presidential Government。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.吳玉山(20000000)。俄羅斯轉型1992-1999：一個政治經濟學的分析。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Alexander, James.(2000)。Political Culture in Post-Communist Russia:Formlessness and Recreation in a Traumatic Transitio。New York:。  new window
7.Brown, Archie.(2001)。Contemporary Russian Politics。Oxford:。  new window
8.McFaul, Michael.(1993)。Post-Communist Politics: Democratic Prospectsin Russia and Eastern Europe。Washington D.C.:。  new window
9.Nogee, Joseph L. and R. Judson Mitchell.(1997)。Russian Politics: the Struggle for a New Order。  new window
10.Troxel, Tiffany A.(2003)。Parliamentary Power in Russia, 1994-2001.。President vs Parliament。New York。  new window
11.Upadhyay, Archana.(2000)。Emergence of the Multi-party System in the Russian Federation: Problems and Prospects。New Dehli。  new window
圖書論文
1.Linz, Juan J.(1994)。Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Differnce?。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspective。Baltimore：John Hopkins University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：783（臺灣：782，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67798212
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上