:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:憲政體制與台、芬政府組成-比較研究途徑
作者:江佩穎
作者(外文):Pei-ying Chiang
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:林水波
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:政府組成政府終結半總統制government formationgovernment terminationsemi-presidentialism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:60
有鑑於國內對於政府組成的相關研究文獻仍屬有限,本文遂以此為研究主題。本文以我國及芬蘭為研究對象,透過二者政府組成實踐經驗之比較,探究多黨體系下半總統制國家的政府組成影響因素、政府組成風格、政府治理機制及政府終結原因。
透過文獻分析及深度訪談,本文主要研究發現為:1)影響多黨體系下半總統制國家政府組成的因素計有憲政體制、政黨體系、選舉因素(包括總統選舉與國會選舉)、政治領導、政治文化、政治動態及政治情境等,但各個因素的影響力並不相同;2)就我國與芬蘭憲政體制同為半總統制的時期來分析,發現總統選舉、政治領導及政治情境三因素皆具有高度影響力,但政黨體系、國會選舉因素的影響力並不一致;3)透過我國與芬蘭政府組成過程的比較可知,由於各個因素的影響力不同,即使憲政體制同為半總統制,所呈現的政府組成風格亦有差異;4)在不同的政府組成風格下,若要避免政府過早終結,則必須設置相符應的政府治理機制。
The purpose of this dissertation is to understand the government formation in Taiwan and Finland using a comparative approach. To achieve this purpose, this dissertation is composed of three parts. The first part describes the factors that might affect the government formation. For example, constitutional institutions, the political party system, electoral system, political leadership, political dynamics and political culture all can influence the government formation. Based on the different characteristics of these factors, the styles of government formation in Taiwan and Finland will be systematically compared in this dissertation.
The second part explains the main institutions of governance in Taiwan and Finland, and the functions of these institutions. A proper institution of governance should conform to the style of government formation. Lastly but not the least, this dissertation is also dedicated to proposing strategies that would avoid the unnecessary termination of government. Descriptive statistics about the reasons that cause the government termination in Taiwan and Finland will be presented in this part.
中文書籍與期刊文章
王業立,1996,〈相對多數vs.絕對多數:各國總統直選方式的比較〉,《選舉研究》,3卷1期(5月),台北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心,頁49-67。new window
______,2001,〈未來立委選制調整的幾個方向及其利弊分析〉,蘇永欽編,《國會改革:台灣民主憲政的新境界?》,頁13-26,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
______與陳坤森,2001,〈聯合內閣的類型與成因之分析〉,蘇永欽編,《聯合政府:台灣民主體制的新選擇?》,頁3-32,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
王耀華,1975,《行政院職權及其地位之研究》,台北:政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
中央選舉委員會編,1999,《總統、副總統選舉方式之研究—絕對多數與相對多數制之探討》,台北:中央選舉委員會。
田麗虹,2001,《國會助理工作手冊:國會生態地圖總導覽》,台北:新自然主義。
石振國,2003,《政黨趨同之研究:國民黨與民進黨的比較分析》,台北:台灣大學政治學研究所博士論文。new window
江光展,2004,《芬蘭選舉制度之研究》,高雄:中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
吳 庚,2004,《憲法的解釋與適用》,台北:三民。
吳玉山,2000,《俄羅斯轉型1992-1999:一個政治經濟學的分析》,台北:五南。new window
______,2001,〈制度、結構與政治穩定〉,《政治學報》,32期(12月),台北:中國政治學會,頁1-30。
______,2002,〈半總統制下的內閣組成與政治穩定:比較俄羅斯、波蘭與中華民國〉,《俄羅斯學報》,2期(1月),台北:國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所,頁229-265。
吳東野,2001,〈多數政府?少數政府?雙首長制憲政運作的省思〉,政黨政治與選舉競爭學術研討會,台北:國家政策研究基金會與中國政治學會,10月6日。
李念祖,2002,〈憲政發展中我國總統權力的演變〉,高朗與隋杜卿編,《憲政體制與總統權力》,頁396-421,台北:國家政策研究基金會。
李俊達,2002,《我國少數政府存立之因:倒閣不可能性之探討》,台中:東海大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
周世雄,1993,〈我國外交政策之制定與執行—淺析決策階層之外交理念〉,《中山社會科學期刊》,2卷1期(2月),台北:國立政治大學中山學術與國家發展研究所,頁185-209。
周育仁,2001,〈憲政體制何去何從?—建構總統制與內閣制換軌機制〉,明居正與高朗編,《憲政體制新走向》,頁1-25,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
周陽山,1995,〈半總統制概念及其實施經驗的反思:芬蘭模式的探討〉,《美歐月刊》,10卷5期(5月),台北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心,頁67-78。
周陽山,2001,〈半總統制的考驗:台灣政黨政治與權力運作〉,《華岡社科學報》,15期(6月),頁15-22。
周陽山,2005,〈芬蘭新憲法與憲政體制之變遷—兼論芬蘭監察使制度〉,《立法院院聞》,台北:立法院,33卷6期(6月),頁23-53。
林子儀等編,2003,《憲法:權力分立》,台北:學林文化。
林水波,2002(A),〈多黨體系與府院關係〉,高朗、隋杜卿編,《憲政體制與總統權力》,頁29-90,台北市:國家政策研究基金會。
______,2002(B),《憲法政治學》,台北市:元照。
______,2004(A),〈向總統制傾斜與立委選制革新〉,《師大政治論叢》,3期(8月),台北:師範大學政治學研究所,頁1-29。
______,2004(B),〈制度移植的策略性評估--以公投法為例〉,《國家政策季刊》,3卷1期(3月),台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會,頁49-80。
林育任,2001,《我國中央最高行政權歸屬─理論與實際之研究》,台北:政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所碩士論文。
林佳龍,2001,〈台灣半總統制的缺失與改進:論總統、閣揆與國會的三角關係〉,明居正與高朗編,《憲政體制新走向》,頁325-349,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
______,2002,〈總統選制的選擇與效應〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁81-123,台北:元照。
林紀東,1991,《中華民國憲法釋論》,台北:大中國。
林崇義,1999,《中華民國憲法形成與發展之研究》,台北:中國文化大學政治學研究所博士論文。new window
林繼文,2002,〈單一選區兩票制與選舉制度改革〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁124-148,台北:元照。
______,2005,〈憲政設計的選制基礎〉,從制度變遷看憲政改革:背景、程序與影響學術研討會,台北:中央研究院政治學研究所籌備處主辦,9月24日。
施嘉明,1995,〈行政院會議與考試院會議的比較研究〉,《人事月刊》,21卷3期(9月),台北:行政院人事行政局,頁25-32。
胡 佛,1998,《政治學的科學探究:(五)憲政結構與政府體制》,台北:三民。
胡祖慶,2001,〈聯合政府的理論與實踐—法國經驗〉,蘇永欽編,《聯合政府:台灣民主體制的新選擇?》,頁81-90,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
徐永明,2002(A),〈半總統制下政府組成的途徑—政黨中心或總統中心?〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁259-272,台北:元照。
______,2002(B),〈單一選區兩票制政治衝擊的模擬〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁467-484,台北:元照。
張台麟,2001,〈法國總統在聯合政府組成與決策中扮演的角色〉,蘇永欽編,《聯合政府:台灣民主體制的新選擇?》,頁163-194,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
張永仰,2002,《憲法增修後總統權力的分析》,台北:中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
張君勱,1997,《中華民國民主憲法十講》,台北:宇宙。new window
張壯熙,2001,〈總統是否有權主導行政院的人事與政策〉,陳建民與周育仁編,《九七修憲與憲政發展》,頁225-237,台北:國家政策研究基金會。
張顯耀,2001,〈行政院院長應否配合立法院改選總辭〉,陳建民與周育仁編,《九七修憲與憲政發展》,頁211-224,台北:國家政策研究基金會。
郭武平,2002,〈中俄憲政發展比較研究〉,《俄羅斯學報》,2期(1月),台北:國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所,頁213-227。new window
陳宏銘,2005,〈半總統制下總統、國會多數與政府的組成:以選制時程的牽引力為分析焦點〉,台灣民主的挑戰與前景學術研討會,台北:台灣政治學會,12月10日-11日。
陳敦源,2002,《民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點》,台北:韋伯文化。new window
陳愛娥,2001,〈憲政體制下政黨與政府組成的關係〉,明居正與高朗編,《憲政體制新走向》,頁141-162,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
______,2002,〈我國現行憲法下總統角色的定性—單純國家統一象徵或真正的政府首長?〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁290-312,台北:元照。
陳新民,2001,《中華民國憲法釋論》,台北:自刊。
陳銘祥,2002,〈現行制度下總統的定位與展望〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁313-332,台北:元照。
彭懷恩,2003,《中華民國政治體系》,台北市:風雲論壇。
______編著,2004,《政治學辭典》,台北市:風雲論壇,初版。
湯德宗,2005,《權力分立新論(卷一:憲法結構與動態平衡)》,台北:元照。new window
隋杜卿,2001,《中華民國的憲政工程:以雙首長制為中心的探討》,台北:韋伯。new window
黃昭元,1997,〈釐清修憲後中央政府體制的解釋爭議〉,《律師雜誌》,215期(8月),台北:臺北律師公會,頁2-5。
______,1998,〈九七修憲後我國中央政府體制的評估〉,《台大法學論叢》,27卷2期(1月),台北:國立臺灣大學法律學系,頁183-216。
______,1999(A),〈法學教室:立法委員改選後行政院應否總辭〉,《月旦法學》,47期(4月),台北:月旦,頁6-7。
______,1999(B),〈法學教室:總統改選後行政院應否辭職〉,《月旦法學》,50期(7月),頁2-3。
黃德福,2001,〈少數政府與責任政治:台灣「半總統制」之下的政黨競爭〉,明居正與高朗編,《憲政體制新走向》,頁97-139,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。new window
黃錦堂,2000,〈台灣雙首長制之內涵〉,《政策月刊》,59期(6月),台北:中國國民黨中央政策會政策研究工作會,頁17-20。
______,2001,〈台灣雙首長制的內涵—向總統制或內閣制傾斜?〉,明居正與高朗編,《憲政體制新走向》,頁265-324,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
______,2004,〈我國中央政府體制的現況與展望〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,108期(5月),台北:月旦,頁9-19。
楊日青,2001,〈政府體制、選舉制度、政黨制度與內閣組合的關係〉,蘇永欽編,《聯合政府:台灣民主體制的新選擇?》,頁195-218,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
楊泰順,2001,〈國會運作與政黨協商〉,蘇永欽編,《國會改革:台灣民主憲政的新境界?》,頁127-149,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
葉俊榮,2003,《民主轉型與憲法變遷》,台北:元照。
董翔飛,1991,《中國憲法與政府》,台北:著者自印。
劉致賢,2001,《穩定半總統體系在府會關係轉變下的運作—芬蘭與法國為例》,台北:台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
劉義周,2005,〈典型的回顧型投票—2005年三合一選舉結果的解析〉,《臺灣民主》,2卷4期(12月),台北:臺灣民主基金會,頁147-152。new window
劉慶瑞,1987,《中華民國憲法要義》,台北:三民。
蔡宗珍,1998,〈政黨政治的迷思—從九七憲改的政黨運作論我國憲政體制下政黨的定位、發展及其危機〉,《台大法學論叢》,27卷2期(1月),台北:國立臺灣大學法律學系,頁49-90。new window
______,2005,〈從總統的憲政角色看我國憲政體制改革之選擇〉,新興民主的憲政改造國際研討會,台北:總統府憲政改造推動工作小組,10月28日-29日。
蔡慧蓉,2002,《政黨輪替與「全民政府」:民主鞏固或反挫?》,台中:東海大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
蕭文生,2001,〈聯合政府成立之研究—以德國為例〉,蘇永欽編,《聯合政府:台灣民主體制的新選擇?》,頁145-161,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
______,2002,〈自法律觀點論國會改選後的政府組成〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁273-289,台北:元照。
謝復生,2001,〈對國會選舉制度改革的幾點建議〉,蘇永欽編,《台灣民主憲政的新境界?》,頁3-12,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
謝瑞智,2000,〈我國之中央政府體制〉,《政策月刊》,59期(6月),台北:中國國民黨中央政策會政策研究工作會,頁2-4。
蘇彥圖,2002(A),〈政府組成的規範與政治〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁393-426,台北:元照。
______,2002(B),〈台灣憲政制度下的政府組成—兼論選後政局的因應之道〉,陳隆志編,《新世紀新憲政:新世紀智庫憲政研討會論文集》,頁427-462,台北:元照。

英文書籍及文章
Anckar, Dag. 1988. “Evading Constitutional Inertia: Exception Laws in Finland.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11(3)(Sep.): 195-210.
_____. 1990. “Democracy in Finland: the Constitutional Framework,” in Jan Sundberg and Sten Berglund, ed., Finnish Democracy. Pp. 26-50. Helsinki: The Finnish political Science Association.
_____. 1992. “Finland: Dualism and Consensual Rule,” in Erik Damgaard, ed., Parliamentary Change in the Nordic Countries. Pp.151-190. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Antero, Jyränki. 1991. “Taking Democracy Seriously: the Problem of Control of the Constitutionality of Legislation- the case of Finland,” in Maija Sakslin, ed., The Finnish Constitution in Transition. pp.6-16. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Constitutional Law.
Arter, David. 1987(A). Politics and Policy-Making in Finland. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
_____. 1987(B). “The 1987 Finnish Election: The Conservatives out of the Wilderness.” West European Politics 10(4)(Oct.): 171-176.
_____. 1991. “The Finnish Election of 17 March 1991: A Victory for Opposition.” West European Politics 14(4)(Oct.): 174-180.
_____. 1994. “The 1994 Finnish Presidential Election: Honesty was not the Best Policy.” West European Politics 17(4)(Oct.): 190-192.
_____. 1999(A). “Finland,” in Robert Elgie, ed., Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. pp.48-66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____. 1999(B). Scandinavian Politics today. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.
_____. 1999(C). “From Class Party to Catchall Party?: The Adaptation of the Finnish Agrarian-Center Party.” Scandinavian Political Studies 22(2)(Jun.): 157–180.
Austen-Smith, David and Jeffrey Banks. 1988. “Elections, coalitions, and legislative outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82(2)(Jun.): 405–422.
Berglund, Sten. 1990. “Finland in a Comparative Perspective,” in Jan Sundberg and Sten Berglund, ed., Finnish Democracy. pp.11-25, Helsinki: The Finnish political Science Association.
Bergman, Torbjörn. 1993(A). “Constitutional Design and Government Formation: the Expected Consequences of Negative Parliamentarism.” Scandinavian Political Studies 16(4)(Dec.): 285-304.
_____. 1993(B). “Formation Rules and Minority Governments.” European Journal of Political Research 23(1)(Jan.): 55–66.
Binham, Timothy. (Translated) 2002. Facts about Finland: Science, Trade, Culture, Industry, History. 3rd ed., Helsinki: Otava Publishing Company.
Budge, Ian and Hans Keman. 1990. Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carmignani, Fabrizio. 2001. “Cabinet formation in Coalition Systems.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48(3)(Aug.): 313-329.
Crombez, Christopher. 1996. “Minority Governments, Minimal Winning Coalitions and Surplus Majorities in Parliamentary Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 29(1)(Jan.): 1-29.
De Swaan, Abram. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments After 1918. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
Diermeier, Daniel, Hülya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo. 2002. “Coalition Governments and Comparative Constitutional Design.” European Economic Review 46(4-5)(May): 893-907.
_____. 2003. “A Structural Model of Governments Formation.” Econometrica 71(1)(Jan.): 27-70.
Duverger, Maurice. 1980. “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government.” Europe Journal Of Political Research 8(2)(Jun.): 165-197.
Elgie, Robert ed., 1999 Semi-presidentialism in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elgie, Robert 2004 “ Semi-presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations,” Political Studies Review, 2(3) (Sep.):314- 330.
Gamson, Willium A. 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.” American Sociological Review 26(3)(Jun.): 373-382.
Glasgow, Garrett. and R. Michael Alvarez. 2005. “Voting Behavior and the Electoral Context of Government Formation.” Electoral Studies 24(2)(Jun.): 245-264.
Grofman, Bernard & Peter van Roozendaal. 1997. “Modelling Cabinet Durability and Termination.” British Journal of Political Science 27(3)(Jul.): 419–451.
Gunther, Richard. 1999. “The Relative Merits (and Weaknesses) of Presidential, Parliamentary and Semi-Presidential System: The Background to Constitutional Reform.” 人文及社會科學集刊,11(1)(Mar.): 76-80。
Hermerén, Henrik. 1976. “Government Formation in Multiparty Systems.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11: 131-146.
Isaksson, Guy-Erik. 2001. “Parliamentary Government in Different Shapes.” West European Politics 24(4)(Oct.): 40-54.
_____. 2005. “From Election to Government: Principal Rules and Deviant Cases.” Government and Opposition No. 40(3)(Jun.): 329-357.
Jussila, Osmo, Seppo Hentilä & Jukka Nekilä. Translated by David Arter & Eva-Kaisa Arter. 1999. From Grand Duchy to a Modern State: a Political History of Finland Since 1809. London: Hurst & Company.
Kuusela, Kimmo. 1995. “The Finnish Electoral System: Basic Features and Development Tendencies,” in Sami Borg & Risto Sänkiaho, ed., The Finnish Voterr. Pp. 23-44. Jyvaskyla: The Finnish Political Science Association.
Lagerspetz, Eerik. 1997. “Social Choice in the Real World II: Cyclical Preferences and Strategic Voting in the Finnish Presidential Elections.” Scandinavian Political Studies 20(1)(Jan): 53-67.
Laver, Michael & Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” American Political Science Review 84(3)(Sep.): 873–890.
_____. ed., 1994. Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lin, Jih-wen. 2003. “A Blue Tango: Electoral Competition and the Formation of Taiwan’s Opposition Coalition.” Issue & Studies, 39(2)(Jun.): 41-72.
Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?,” in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, ed., The Future of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives. Pp.33-87.Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press.
Lupia, Arthur and Kaare Strøm. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” The American Political Science Review 89(3)(Sep.): 648-665.
Martin, Lanny W. and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1)(Jan.): 33–50.
Mattila, Mikko. 1997. “From Qualified Majority to Simple Majority: The Effects of the 1992 Change in the Finnish Constitution.” Scandinavian Political Studies 20(4)(Nov.): 331-347.
_____ and Tapio Raunio. 2002. “Government Formation in the Nordic Countries: The Electoral Connection.” Scandinavian Political Studies 25(3)(Sep.): 259-280.
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Kaare Strøm. ed., 2003. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mylly, Juhani and R. Michael Berry (eds.) 1984 Political Parties in Finland: Essays in History and Politics. Turku: Turku Univ. Press.
Nousiainen, Jaakko. 1971. The Finnish Political System. Cambridge: MA.
_____. 1994. “Finland: Ministerial Autonomy, Constitutional Collectivism, and Party Oligarchy,” in M. Laver and K. A. Shepsle, ed., Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. pp.88-105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____. 1996. “Finland: Operational Cabinet Autonomy in a Party-centred System,” in Jean Blondel and Maurizio Cotta, ed., Party and Government: An Inquiry into the Relations between Governments and Supporting Parties in Liberal Democracies. pp.110-127. Basingstoke & London: Macmillan.
_____. 1997. “Finland,” in Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel, ed., Cabinets in Western Europe. pp.244-276. 2nd ed, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan.
_____. 2001(A). “The Finnish System of Government: From a Mixed Constitution to Parliamentarism,” in The Constitution of Finland. Pp.5-42. Helsinki: Parliament of Finland, The Ministry for Foreign Affairs and The Ministry of Justice Published.
_____. 2001(B). “From Semi-presidentialism to Parliamentary Government: Political and Constitutional Developments in Finland.” Scandinavian Political Studies 24(2)(Jun.): 95-109.
_____. 2003. “Finland: The Consolidation of Parliamentary Governance,” in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, ed., Coalition Governments in Western Europe. pp.264-299. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nurmi, Hannu. 1990. “A Theoretical Review of the Finnish Parliamentary and Presidential Electoral Systems,” in Jan Sundberg & Sten Berglund, ed., Finnish Democracy. pp.51-64. Helsinki: The Finnish political Science Association.
Paloheimo, Heikki. 2001. “Divided Government in Finland: From a Semi-presidential to a Parliamentary Democracy,” in R. Elgie, ed., Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. pp. 86-105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____. 2003. “The Rising Power of the Prime Minister in Finland.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26(3)(Sep.): 219-243.
Pekka, Länsineva. 1991. “The Constitutional Committee of Parliament: The Finish Model of Norm Control,” in Maija Sakslin, ed., The Finnish Constitution in Transition. pp.68-80. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Constitutional Law.
Pesonen, Pertti. 2001. “Change and Stability in the Finnish Party System,” in Lauri Karvonen & Stein Kuhnle, ed., Party Systems and Voter Alignments Revisited: With an Introduction by Seymour Martin Lipset. Pp.115-137. London: Routledge.
Pesonen, Pertti and Olavi Riihinen. 2002. Dynamic Finland: The Political System and the Welfare State. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
_____. 1999. Politics in Finland. McGraw-Hill.
Puntila, L. A., Translated by David Miller. 1975. The Political History of Finland 1809-1966. Helsinki: Otava Publishing Co.
Raunio, Tapio. 2004. “The Changing Finnish Democracy: Stronger Parliamentary Accountability, Coalescing Political Parties and Weaker External Constraints.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27(2)(Jun.): 133-152.
Richardson, Jeremy, Gunnel Gustafsson and Gant Jordan. 1982. “The Concept of Policy Style,” in Jeremy Richardson, ed., Policy Styles in Western Europe. Pp.1-16. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
_____. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger’s Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76(4)(Dec.): 753-756.
Schofield, Norman. 1993. “Political Competition and Multiparty Coalition Governments.” European Journal of Political Research 23(1)(Jan.): 1-33.
_____. 1995. “Coalition Politics: A Formal Model and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 7(3)(Apr.): 245-281.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solsten, Eric and Sandra W. Meditz. ed., 1990. Finland: A Country Study. 2nd ed Washington D.C.: Headquarters, Dept. of the Army.
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____, Ian Budge and Michael J. Laver. 1994. “Constraints on Cabinet formation in parliamentary democracies.” American Journal of Political Science, 38(2)(May): 303-335.
Sundberg, 2002. “The Electoral System of Finland: Old, and Working well,” in B. Grofman and A. Lijphart, ed., The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries. pp.67-99. NY: Agathon Press.
_____. 2004. “Finland.” European Journal of Political Research Vol. 43(7/8)(Dec.): 1000-1005.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: the Effects and Determinates of Electoral Systems. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Törnudd, Klaus. 1968. The Electoral System of Finland. London: Hugh Evelyn.
Tsebelis, George. 2000. “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis.” Governance 13(4)(Oct.): pp.441-474.
Von Beyme, Klaus, Translated by Eileen Martin. 1985. Political Parties in Western Democracies. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower.
Von Bonsdorff, Göran. 1960. “The Party Situation in Finland,” in Finnish Political Science Association, ed., Democracy in Finland. pp.18-27. Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association.
Warwick, Paul V. 1996. “Coalition Government Membership in West European Parliamentary Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 26(4)(Oct.): 471–499.
_____. 1998. “Policy Distance and Parliamentary Government.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(3)(Aug.): 319–345.
_____. 2001 “Coalition Policy Parliamentary Democracies: Who Gets How Much and Why.” Comparative Political Studies 34(10)(Dec.): 1212–1236.
Woldendorp, Jaap, Hans Keman and Ian Budge. 1998. “Party government in 20 Democracies(1990-1995).” European Journal of Political Research 33(1)(Jan.): 125-164.


網站搜尋結果
中華民國總統府,〈國父及行憲後歷任總統〉,http://www.president.gov.tw/1_roc_intro/xpresident/b_cha.html,上網檢視日期:2005年12月2日。
行政院,〈歷任正副院長簡介〉,http://www.ey.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=18&CtUnit=77&BaseDSD=14&mp=1,上網檢視日期:2006年2月6日。
李祖舜、劉永祥,〈扁馬會與扁連會、扁宋會比較〉http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=137&f_SUB_ID=612&f_ART_ID=30757,上網檢視日期:2006年4月3日。
陳英珊,〈反扁激情不再?綠菊互動一覽〉http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=6671,上網檢視日期:2005年2月25日。
聯合新聞網,〈扁宋會 十點聯合聲明〉 http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=8538,上網檢視日期:2005年2月5日。
Diermeier, Daniel, Hülya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo. 2004. “Bicameralism and Governments Formation,” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=312149, 上網檢視日期:2006年3月18日。
Finnish Social Science Data Archive 2004 “FSD 1264: Finnish Voter Barometer April 2002 Code Book,” http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1264/cbf1264e.pdf, 上網檢視日期:2004年12月15日。
Hämäläinen, Unto. “Finnish Domestic Politics - February 2003 - Political Parties Reluctant to Take Pre-election Risks,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=14862&intIGID=&intCatID=607&CatTypeNumber=3&LAN=EN&contlan=&Thread=&intThreadPosition=2, 上網檢視日期:2003年2月18日。
Helsingin Sanomat, “ President Halonen Rejects Her Predecessor's NATO Criticism,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/President+Halonen+rejects+her+predecessors+NATO+criticism/1101981346563, 上網檢視日期:2005年10月20日。
Helsingin Sanomat. “Dispute on New Crisis Management Law Escalates in Parliament: Majority of Constitution Committee Call for Changes in Government Bill,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Dispute+on+new+crisis+mangement+law+escalates+in+Parliament/1101981747121, 上網檢視日期:2005年11月25日。
Helsingin Sanomat. “Finns Want President to Show Strong Leadership and Defend Everyday Security: Foreign Policy Authority and NATO Issue Less Important in Choice of Candidates,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Finns+want+president+to+show+strong+leadership+and+defend+everyday+security/1101981543816, 上網檢視日期:2005年11月7日。
Helsingin Sanomat. “Government Proposes Constitutional Amendment on Crisis Management Issue: Change to Underscore President’s Authority in Deploying Forces,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Government+proposes+constitutional+amendment+on+crisis+management+issue/1101981830021, 上網檢視日期:2004年4月16日。
Helsingin Sanomat. “Piqued PM Keen to Explain Press Rumours surrounding his divorce,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Piqued+PM+keen+to+explain+press+rumours+surrounding+his+divorce+/1101979152476, 上網檢視日期:2004年4月16日。
Helsingin Sanomat. “Social Democrats Nominate Halonen - Left Alliance Also Gives Endorsement,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Social+Democrats+nominate+Halonen+-Left+Alliance+also+gives+endorsement/1101981698018, 上網檢視日期:2005年11月21日。
Helsingin Sanomat. “Televised Debate Reveals Differences Among Presidential Candidates: Vanhanen the Reformer, Niinistö the Wake-up Man, and Halonen the Bridge-builder,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Televised+debate+reveals+differences+among+Presidential+candidates+/1101981709150, 上網檢視日期:2005年11月22日。
Hentilä, Seppo. “Finland's Leap into Democracy,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=25908, 上網檢視日期:2003年2月8日。
Jakobson, Max. “Finland Is an Exception in Europe,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Finland+is+an+exception+in+Europe/1101981085113, 上網檢視日期:2005年9月27日。
Karvonen, Kyösti. “Election Fever in Finland,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=45221, 上網檢視日期:2005年12月16日。
Karvonen, Kyösti. “Finnish Conservatives in the Wilderness,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=22719&intIGID=&intCatID=607&CatTypeNumber=3&LAN=EN&;contlan=&;Thread=&intThreadPosition=14, 上網檢視日期:2004年4月2日。
Karvonen, Kyösti. “Matti Vanhanen - Prime Minister by Chance.” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=18819&...,上網檢視日期:2003年11月6日。
Karvonen, Kyösti. “The Favourite and the Challenger Line Up,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=46709&intIGID=3&intCatID=&CatTypeNumber=3&LAN=EN&contlan=&Thread=&intThreadPosition=0, 上網檢視日期:2006年1月20日。
Kokkonen, Antti. “Commentary: The President is Like the Weekly Lotto Numbers,” http://www.hs.fi/english/article/COMMENTARY+The+President+is+like+the+weekly+Lotto+numbers/1101981557679, 上網檢視日期:2005年11月8日。
Sippola, Anna-Riitta. “Finland has a New President and a New Constitution,” http://www2.hs.fi/english/archive/thisweek/10042000.html, 上網檢視日期:2001年6月5日。
Sokkanen, Timo. “Structure and development of Political Parties,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=25784, 上網檢視日期:2003年3月20日。
STT. “Finland's New Ministers Take Up Their Portfolios,” http://virtual.finland.fi/stt/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=10116&group=Politics, 上網檢視日期:2005年9月23日。
STT. “Finland's Social Democratic Party Appoints New Ministers,” http://virtual.finland.fi/stt/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=9957&group=Politics, 上網檢視日期:2005年9月8日。
STT. “Finns Want a Strong President -Poll,” http://virtual.finland.fi/stt/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=11199&group=Politics, 上網檢視日期:2005年12月22日。
STT. “UPDATE: Finnish President Defends Her Seat at EU Summits,” http://virtual.finland.fi/stt/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=10407&group=Politics, 上網檢視日期:2005年10月18日。
The Finnish Government, “Facts about the Government”, http://www.valtioneuvosto.fi/tietoa-valtioneuvostosta/perustietoa/en.jsp,上網檢視日期:2005年6月12日。
The Office of the President of the Republic of Finland 2000. “Presidential Elections 1919-2000,” http://www.presidentti.fi/netcomm/ImgLib/9/180/vaalitilastot_eng.pdf, 上網檢視日期:2003年6月8日。
The Parliament of Finland, “The History of Finnish Parliament,” http://www.parliament.fi/efakta/esite/englanti/eesit_01.htm#02, 上網檢視日期:2006年3月28日。
The Parliament of Finland. 2003. “Appendix 1: Parties’ Relative Strengths in Parliament,” The Finnish Parliament: Statistic 2003. http://www.parliament.fi/efakta/esite/englanti/statistics2003.pdf, 上網檢視日期:2003年6月18日。
Tiitinen, Seppo. 2000 “Reform of the constitution,” http://virtual.finland.fi/netcomm/news/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=25782, 上網檢視日期:2002年12月22日。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE