:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會學中功能分析的目的論與循環論證問題
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:黃厚銘 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Hou-ming
出版日期:2010
卷期:80
頁次:頁237-286
主題關鍵詞:功能分析因果解釋循環論證目的論結構系統Functional analysisCausal explanationTeleologyTeologyStructureSystem
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:98
  • 點閱點閱:127
本文著眼於功能分析做為一種研究的邏輯形式,就其與因果解釋結合所產生的疑難,來整理社會學中的功能分析在發展過程中所遭遇的困境。同時,也從這個癥結點來掌握此一理論傳統的發展軸線,並檢討各理論家的貢獻與限制。簡言之,不正當目的論問題與循環論證的合理化現狀後果是長期困擾功能分析傳統的核心問題意識,但也如孔恩所謂的典範做為解謎遊戲一般,為了解決不正當目的論與循環論證的問題而檢討功能分析中的有機類比、系統構想、以及對功能概念的不斷重構是功能分析典範內部之重要發展軸線。這是此一傳統中的有志之士理論創造的思想源頭,也因此構成了此一傳統的活力來源,然而,由於這個典範預設了有機類比或是社會的系統性,所以也受限於這樣的觀點,而在無形中帶進了許多相關的設定,以致難以跳脫前述預設所加諸於這個理論傳統的限制。
This paper contends that solving the problems of tautology and illegal teleology is essential for the development of functional analysis in sociology. That is, similar to conditions described by Kuhn旧 paradigm concept, generations of theorists in the tradition of functional analysis have attempted to reconstruct the concepts of function, system, etc., and to elaborate the relationships between functional analysis and causal explanation, or between functional analysis and organic analogy, in order to deal with the problems mentioned above. These efforts are the driving force behind the development of functional analysis, and the source of creativity of so many excellent scholars in this theoretical tradition. However, their endeavors were hindered by their conceptual presuppositions such as system, structure etc.
期刊論文
1.葉啟政(1986)。「功能」的概念社會的事實抑或詮釋的幽魂。中國社會學刊,10,17-60。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bednarz, John Jr.(1984)。Complexity and intersubjectivity: towards the theory of Niklas Luhmann。Human Studies,7,55-69。  new window
3.Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R.(1935)。On the Concept of Function in Social Science。American Anthropologist,37,394-402。  new window
4.Luhmann, N.、湯志傑、鄒川雄(19940600)。社會系統的自我再製。思與言,32(2),133-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Malinowski, Bronislaw(1939)。The Group and the Individual in Functional Analysis。American Journal of Sociology,(44),938-964。  new window
學位論文
1.湯志傑(1992)。NiklasLuhmann的系統理論及其對法律的社會學分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Abrahamson, M.(1978)。Functionalism。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.費孝通(譯序);馬林諾斯基(1987)。文化論。台北:台灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hempel, Carl G.(1965)。Aspects of Scientific Explanation: And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science。Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.。  new window
4.Swingewood, Alan(1984)。A Short History of Sociological Thought。New York, NY:St. Martin's Press。  new window
5.Parsons, Talcott(1979)。The Social System。Great Britain:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
6.Stromberg, Roland N.、蔡伸章(1993)。近代西方思想史。臺北市:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Parsons, Talcott、Shils, Edward(1951)。Toward a General Theory of Action。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Parsons, Talcott、Bales, Robert F.、Shils, Edward A.(1953)。Working papers in the theory of action。Free Press。  new window
9.Parsons, Talcott(1968)。The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers。New York:Free Press。  new window
10.Hamilton, Peter、蔡明璋(1990)。派森思。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.富蘭克林.包默、李日章(1988)。西方近代思想史。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Nagel, Ernest(1979)。The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation。New York:Harcourt Brace & World。  new window
13.Durkheim, Émile、Simpson, George(1933)。The Division of Labor in Society。Free Press。  new window
14.Nassehi, Armin、Kneer, Georg、魯貴顯、國立編譯館(1998)。盧曼社會系統理論導引。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Giddens, A.(1977)。Studies in Social and Political Theory。New York:Basic Books。  new window
16.高宣揚(2002)。魯曼社會系統理論與現代性。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.葉啟政(20040000)。進出「結構-行動」的困境--與當代西方社會學理論論述對話。臺北:三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.高宣揚(2001)。當代社會理論。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.葉啟政(2008)。邁向修養社會學。三民。  延伸查詢new window
20.Durkheim, Emile、Lukes, Steven、Halls, W. D.(1982)。The Rules of Sociological Method。Free Press。  new window
21.何秀煌(譯);Hempel, Carl G.(1977)。科學的哲學。台北。  延伸查詢new window
22.夏建中(譯);雷得克利夫布朗Radcliffe-Brown, A. R.(1994)。社會人類學方法。台北。  延伸查詢new window
23.黃瑞祺(譯);墨頓Merton,Rober K.(1984)。顯性功能與隱性功能。現代社會學結構功能論選讀。台北。  延伸查詢new window
24.帕深思Parsons Talcore(1984)。〈 結構功能論在當前社會學中的地位〉。《 現代社會學結構功能論選讀》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
25.周怡君(譯);魯貴顯(2004)。導論:溝通中的上帝。社會的宗教。台北。  延伸查詢new window
26.Turner, Jonathan H.、吳曲輝(1996)。社會學理論的結構。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
27.Wiener, P. P.(1988)。觀念史大辭典IV :自然與歷史卷。幼獅文化事業公司編譯部主編。台北。  延伸查詢new window
28.殷佩斯(譯);荷布更(1974)。活力說與機械說。台北。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃瑞祺(譯);顧德諾Gouldner, Alvin W.(1984)。功能論中的互惠與自主。現代社會學結構功能論選讀。台北。  延伸查詢new window
30.Campbell, Neil A.(1990)。Biology。CA:Benjamin Cummings。  new window
31.Coser, Lewis and Bernard Rosenberg(1967)。Sociological Theory: A Book of Readings。New York。  new window
32.Darwin, Charles(1969)。The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life。New York。  new window
33.Mark Traugott(1978)。Emile Durkheim On Institutional Analysis。Chicago:Chicago Univ. Press。  new window
34.Gane, Mike(1988)。On Durkheim’s Rules of Sociological Method。New York。  new window
35.Garfinkel, Harold(1967)。Studies in Echnomethodology。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey。  new window
36.Hull, David L.(1974)。Philosophy of Biological Science。New Jersey。  new window
37.Luhmann, Nildas(1976)。Generalized Media and the Problem of Contigency。Explorations in General Theory in Social Science: Essays in Honor of Talcott Parsons。New York。  new window
38.Luhmann, Nildas(1982)。The Differentiation of Socieiy。New York。  new window
39.Luhmann, Nildas(1987)。Modern System Theory and the Theory of Society。Modern German Sociology。New York。  new window
40.Malinowski, Bronislaw(1961)。The Functional Theory of Culture。The Dynamics of Culture Change。Mass。  new window
41.Malinowski, Bronislaw(1967)。Functionalism in Anthropology。Sociological Theory。New York。  new window
42.Spencer, Herbert(1967)。Social Structure and Social Function。Sociological Theory。  new window
43.Stinchcombe, Arthur L.(1968)。Construction Social Theories。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE