:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美容意願量表:利用健康信念模式預測醫院員工之美容意願與行動
書刊名:醫務管理期刊
作者:張金鳳翁瑞宏 引用關係黃國峯錢才瑋
作者(外文):Chang, Chin-fengWeng, Rhay-hungHuang, Kuo-fengChien, Tsair-wei
出版日期:2010
卷期:11:4
頁次:頁249-264
主題關鍵詞:自覺罹患分量表改善必要性分量表Rasch模式試題反應理論美容意願量表Perceived susceptibility subscaleImprovement essentiality subscaleRasch modelItem response theoryAesthetic intention scale
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:73
目的:發展一具美容意願量表,能夠預測醫院員工接受美容的意願,且能揭示一套檢核受試者答題反應的健康信念美容意願報告卡。 方法:利用試題反應理論Rasch模式的WINSTEPS軟體,檢測某醫院員工填答接受美容的意願量表,是否構成單向度的測量。並以迴歸分析找出影響美容意願的因子、以接受者操作特徵曲線找出美容意願量表的決斷點,作為預測美容行動的依據。 結果:12道美容意願量表被檢測出具有兩個特徵因素(自覺罹患分量表及改善必要性分量表)。當兩個分量表合併分數後的決斷點大於2.875分時,對於有意願採取美容行動的準確度達87.1%。檢核受試者答題反應的健康信念美容意願報告卡,標準化殘差可以提供美容服務機構檢視受試者在某題上反應與眾不同的異常揭露。 結論:利用健康信念模式發展出來的美容意願量表,可以用來預測醫院員工之美容意願與行動。
Objectives: To develop a scale that predicts aesthetic intention and ability to take action by hospital employees and incorporates a report card that clearly discloses individual examinees' aberrant responses on items. Methods: A Rasch model based on item response theory (IRT) with WINSTEPS software was utilized to examine an aesthetic intention scale to determine if it formed a single construct. Multiply regress analyses were used to identify the key factors associated with aesthetic intention. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was applied to determine a cut-off point for examinee's ability to take aesthetic action. Results: The 12-item aesthetic intention scale has two characteristic features (i.e., subscales of perceived susceptibility and essential improvement). The cut-off point was set at 2.875 after combining those two scaled scores and accounted for 87.1% of sensitivity on the target population. The report card of examinee's aberrant responses on items using standardized residual scores can provide aesthetic service institutes with a tool for following up on unusual responses in comparison with the model's expectations. Conclusions: The aesthetic intention scale examined by the Rasch model can be used with hospital employees to predict aesthetic intention and ability to take action.
期刊論文
1.Linacre, J. M.(2002)。Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness。Journal of Applied Measurement,3(1),85-106。  new window
2.陳坤成、孔繁麗(20100300)。醫學美容經營策略之探討--以A醫院附設醫學美容中心為例。美容科技學刊,7(1),205-229。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡正文(20100400)。社會趨勢:外表,是真實的「謊言」。臺南科技大學通識教育學刊,9,85-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.錢才瑋、王文中、蘇世斌、陳俞成(20070900)。偵測問卷調查受試者亂答填卷之研究:以醫師滿意度調查為例。醫療資訊雜誌,16(3),71-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Horn, J. L.(1965)。A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis。Psychometrika,30(2),179-185。  new window
6.Andrich, D.(1978)。A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories。Psychometrika,43,561-573。  new window
7.Zweig, M. H.、Campbell, G.(1993)。Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine。Clin Chem,39,561-577。  new window
8.王文中(20041200)。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究,27(4),637-694。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Fabrigar, Leandre R.、Wegener, Duane T.、MacCallum, Robert C.、Strahan, Erin J.(1999)。Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research。Psychological Methods,4(3),272-299。  new window
10.Rosenstock, Irwin M.(1974)。The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior。Health Education & Behavior,2(4),354-386。  new window
11.Janz, Nancy K.、Becker, Marshall H.(1984)。The Health Belief Model: A decade later。Health Education Quarterly,11(1),1-47。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡青姿(2004)。醫學雷射美容消費意向模式建構之實證研究--結構方程模式之應用(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rasch, G.(1960)。Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests。Copenhagen:The Danish Institute of Educational Research。  new window
其他
1.劉燦宏、任文瑗、趙嘉成、崔岡、邱文達(2004)。以顧客關係管理觀點探討自費醫療服務。  延伸查詢new window
2.N Wolf(1991)。The beauty myth: How images of beauty arc used against women。  new window
3.DB Sarwer, T Cash, LBA Magee et al(2004)。Female college students and cosmetic surgery: an investigation of experiences, attitudes, and body image。  new window
4.JA Litner, BW Rotenberq, M Dennis, PA Adamson(2008)。Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life。  new window
5.NK Janz, VL Champion, VJ Strecher(2002)。The health belief model。  new window
6.AB Silverstein(1987)。Note on the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors or principal components。  new window
7.VH Patil, NS Surendra, M Sanjay, DT Donavan(2008)。Efficient Theory Development and Factor Retention Criteria: A Case for Abandoning the ‘Eigenvalue Greater Than One’ Criterion。  new window
8.VH Patil, NS Surendra, M Sanjay, DT Donavan(20100801)。Parallel Analysis Engine to Aid in Determining Number of Factors to Retain。  new window
9.JM. Linacre(20100801)。WINSTEPS [computer program]。  new window
10.AB Smith, EP Wright, R Rush, DP Stark, G Velikova, PJ Sclby(2006)。Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale。  new window
11.AB Smith, P Wright, PJ Selby, G Velikova(2007)。A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)。  new window
12.AB Smith, P Wright, PJ Selby, G Velikova(2007)。A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)。  new window
13.NW Scott, PM Fayers, NK Aaronson et al(2010)。Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression。  new window
14.CE Metz(1978)。Basic principles of ROC analysis。  new window
15.PF Griner, RJ Mayewski, AI Mushlin, P Greenland(1981)。Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures。  new window
16.TW Chien, WC Wang, SB Lin, CY Lin, HR. Guo, SB Su.(2009)。KIDMAP, a Web based system for gathering patients’ feedback on their doctors。  new window
17.TW Chien, WC Wang, HY Wang, HJ Lin(2009)。Online assessment of patients views on hospital performances using Rasch model’s KIDMAP diagram。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE