:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸銀行業經營績效與生產力之探討
書刊名:華人前瞻研究
作者:陳富強方顯光 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Fu-chiangFang, Hsien-kuang
出版日期:2011
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁15-30
主題關鍵詞:資料包絡分析法麥氏生產力規模報酬經營績效Data envelopment analysisMalmquist productivityReturns to scalePerformance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:220
  • 點閱點閱:161
本研究採用資料包絡分析法(DEA)與麥氏生產力指數(MPI)評估兩岸銀行的經營績效、生產力變動與經營類型分析。樣本取自台灣經濟新報(TEJ),選取06-09年本國銀行26家及大陸銀行14家之資料。實證分析結果,大陸銀行純技術效率(PTE)、成本效率(CE)與配置效率值(AE)皆顯著高於本國非金控銀行;本國銀行技術效率(TE)與CE無效率原因,皆來自PTE較多,大陸銀行則分別來自規模效率(SE)與PTE較多;兩岸銀行處於規模報酬遞減者為最多,約佔73%以上06-09年本國銀行MPI平均值為0.990且呈現逐年下滑的現象,而大陸銀行MPI平均值為0.897且呈現逐年上升現象;本國與大陸銀行分別屬於「低效率且低生產力」與「高效率但低生產力」者最多。
This study uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist productivity index (MPI) assess the performance of cross-strait banking, productivity changes and operational types. Samples taken from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ), 06-09 years, selected 26 domestic banks and 14 Mainland banks information. Empirical analysis, pure technical efficiency Continental Bank (PTE), cost efficiency (CE) and the value of allocative efficiency (AE) were significantly higher than their non-bank financial holding company : national bank technical efficiency (TE) and CE without efficiency reasons, all from PTE more mainland banks from scale efficiency (SE) with the PTE more; cross-strait banking is decreasing returns to scale had the highest, accounting for more than 73%; 06-09 years, an average of 0.990 MPI domestic banks and has been declining Phenomenon, and Continental Bank and MPI showed an average annual increase of the phenomenon of 0.897; domestic and Continental Bank were a "low efficiency and low productivity "and "high efficiency but low productivity" by most.
期刊論文
1.Zhu, J.、Shen, Z.(1995)。A Discussion of Testing DMUs' Returns to Scale。European Journal of Operational Research,81(3),590-596。  new window
2.王克陸、彭雅惠、陳美燁(2007)。台灣金控子銀行經營績效之評估--使用DEA方法。科技管理學刊,12(2),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Zhang, A.、Ronald, Z.(2001)。Impact of ownership and competition on the productivity of Chinese enterprises。Journal of Comparative Economics,29 (2),327-346。  new window
4.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurites R.、Diewert, W. Eerwin(1982)。Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers。The Economic Journal,92(365),73-86。  new window
5.Malmquist, Sten(1953)。Index numbers and indifference surfaces。Trabajos de Estadística y de Investigación Operativa,4(2),209-242。  new window
6.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
7.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurits R.、Diewert, W. Erwin(1982)。The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,50(6),1393-1414。  new window
8.楊永列(20100100)。臺灣地區本國銀行成本成長率之估計。經濟與管理論叢,6(1),79-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
10.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
11.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1992)。The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance。Harvard Business Review,70(1),71-79。  new window
12.Hugh, H.、Ashworth, G.、Gooch, J.、Davies, R.(1996)。Who needs performance management?。Management Accounting,74(11),20-25。  new window
13.Banker, R. D.、Maindiratla, A.(1988)。Nonparametric analysis of technical and allocative efficiencies in production。Econometrica,56,1315-1332。  new window
14.Favero C. A.,、Papi.(1995)。Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency in Italian Banking Sector: A Non- Parametric approach。Applied Economics,27,385-395。  new window
15.Ferrier, G.、Lovell, C. A. K.(1990)。Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence.。Journal of econometrics,46(1/2),229-245。  new window
學位論文
1.賴呈昌(2004)。台灣地區金控銀行與非金控銀行績效之評估-DEA方法之應用(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.李美芳(2009)。第一次金改對銀行技術效率的影響分析(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張靜怡(2003)。我國銀行業購併效率之實證分析。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭秋香(2004)。台灣銀行業經營績效之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃俊誠(2003)。台灣地區納入金控之銀行與獨立銀行在金控法實施因素下影響經營績效之實證分析。  延伸查詢new window
6.李水德(2009)。臺灣銀行業經營效率與外匯業務之實證研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.林岳松(2009)。台灣金融機構經營績效分析-資料包絡分析法應用。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊振宗(2009)。台灣上市銀行經營績效之探討資料包絡分析法之應用。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rosenzweig, J. E.、Kast, F. E.(1974)。Organization and Management: A Systems Approach。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill Book Co.。  new window
2.高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸(2003)。管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法。臺北:華泰文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Robbins, S. P.(2006)。Organization Theory: Structure, Design, & applications。NY。  new window
4.Yue, Piyu.(1992)。Date Envelopment Analysis and Commercial Bank Performance: A Primer with Applications to Missouri Banks.。Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE