:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:陳耀文《正楊》中「嵎夷既略」條駁楊慎釋「略」述評
書刊名:東吳中文學報
作者:劉玉國 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Yu-guo
出版日期:2011
卷期:22
頁次:頁227-248
主題關鍵詞:本義引申義上下文義對文互文異文Its own meaningExtended meaningThe meaning of contextDuiwenIntertextualityYiwen
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:67
明代中葉,由於受到王學末流倡導直指本心,主張現成良知,視文字為糟粕之影響,致古學寖衰、學風凋敝,有識之士,憂學術之隳壞,紛紛起而矯之。楊慎(1488-1559)允稱其間代表。慎博學多聞,雖遭世宗朝議大禮之禍,長期謫貶西南隅,然著述不輟,撰《丹鉛總錄》、《丹鉛雜錄》、《讀苑醍醐》、《藝林伐山》等書,考釋經史,於古籍詞義之舊注,每多再思辨正,雖精闢者不少,惟以身處荒陬,取書翻查不易,每斷之以記憶,又「好偽撰古書,以證成己說」,每成見詬之尤。致同代學者,有不愜其說而著書駁之者。陳耀文(約1523-1619)《正楊》四卷,便專為糾駁楊說而作;該書之體例:先列楊說,繼以駁論,「嵎夷既略」便是其中一條。該條所論者,乃經史古籍如《尚書》、《左傳》、《孟子》、《史記》、《漢書》中,「略」之詞義;經蒐集、比對相關用例,並從上下文義,而忽略其引申義,確屬不妥,陳耀文於文末批之曰:「夫字有數義也,而執謬若此,故知固哉!」允中其病。
WangYangming was the major leader in the Neo-Confucian School of Mind that also was mainstream in the middle of the Ming Dynasty. This School of principle developed the idea of innate consciousness, arguing that the writing was not valuable to society, so cause problems for the decline of classical literature. Most scholars worried about this situation and sought to correct these mistakes in the literary circles in the Ming Dynasty. Yang Shen (1488~1559) was one of the representative scholars. As a result of the Great rites controversy, he was exiled to Yunnan. He spent over 30 years in Yunnan and continued his career writing for this period. Although he lived in the wasteland, he still did his best to read canon of literary works. He was good at making a survey of the classics and historical reference and then produced a substantial amount of commentary inspired by the classical literature and sage's speech. His famous work is the Danqian zonglu, Danqian zalu, Duyuan tihu, Yilin fashan, etc. On the other hand, some other scholars didn't accept his opinions on Yang Shen's books; they also produced an amount of writing to refute Yang Shen's comment on his books. For instance, in the volume 4 of Zhengyang, Chen Yaowen (about 1523~1619) criticized Yang Shen's with his own thought and corrected his mistakes, specifically ”Yu yi ji lue” is one of the famous examples of Chen's review.Chen Yaowen made a survey of Classic of History, Zuo Zhuan, Mencius, Records of the Grand Historian, and Book of Han to compare the definitions of word ”lue.” In fact, he thought Yang's review is inappropriate because he overlook the extended meaning of the word ”lue.” In the end of ”Yu yi ji lue,” Chen said: ”the word ”fu” with lots of definitions, Yang's speech is improper.”
會議論文
1.郭墨蘭(2009)。青州與東夷文化的發展。濟南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蘇新春(1992)。漢語詞義學。廣州:廣東教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡渭、鄒逸麟(2006)。禹貢錐指。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.紀昀、毛奇齡(1986)。文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.李曉光、李波(1989)。史記索引。北京:中國廣播電視出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.清高宗敕、清‧永瑢、紀昀(1981)。《四庫全書總目》。臺北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.商鞅、貝遠辰(1996)。新譯商君書。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.班固、顏師古(1982)。漢書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.屈萬里(1972)。尚書釋義。臺北:華岡文化出版部。  延伸查詢new window
9.孟軻、沈文倬、焦循(1988)。孟子正義。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳啟天(1986)。商鞅評傳。台北:商務書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.司馬遷、顧頡剛(1985)。史記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.鍾柏生(19890000)。殷商卜辭地理論叢。臺北:藝文印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭良樹(1987)。商鞅及其學派。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊伯峻(1982)。春秋左傳注。台北:源流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.朱熹(1983)。四書章句集注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.左丘明、杜預、孔穎達(2001)。春秋左傳正義。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.林之奇(1986)。尚書全解。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉安、張雙棣(1997)。淮南子校釋。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.商鞅(1956)。商君書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
20.茅瑞徵(2006)。禹貢匯疏。歷代禹貢文獻集成。西安。  延伸查詢new window
21.過庭訓(n.d.)。本朝分省人物考。  延伸查詢new window
22.陳耀文(1971)。正楊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.王世貞(n.d.)。弇州山人四部續稿。  延伸查詢new window
24.錢繹(1989)。方言箋疏。爾雅、廣雅、方言、釋名,清疏四種合刊。上海。  延伸查詢new window
25.周之湖、嚴克嶟(n.d.)。確山縣志。  延伸查詢new window
26.何顯祖、黃正(n.d.)。汝寧府志。  延伸查詢new window
27.賀凌虛(1988)。商君書今注今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
28.李波、李曉光(2001)。漢書索引。北京。  延伸查詢new window
29.孫星衍(1980)。尚書今古文注疏。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(明)焦竑(1977)。澹園集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE