:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:整合田口損失函數與層級分析法於軟體產品使用者品質評估之應用
書刊名:品質學報
作者:韓文銘廖珮妏
作者(外文):Han, Wen-mingLiao, Pei-wen
出版日期:2012
卷期:19:2
頁次:頁97-116
主題關鍵詞:田口損失函數軟體品質評估軟體產品品質層級分析法ISO/IEC 9126Taguchi loss functionSoftware quality assessmentSoftware product qualityAnalytical hierarchy process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:566
  • 點閱點閱:35
過與不及的品質管控與改善活動都會導致企業競爭力下降。因為如果產品品質超過目標值,則代表企業投入過多的有限資源以致使利潤降低或資源排擠;反之若產品品質未達到目標值,則代表企業投入的資源不足以致使產品無法符合客戶期望且無法驗收。有鑒於此,本研究提出一個整合田口損失函數與層級分析法的軟體產品品質評估方法,以使用者品質觀點為主軸來量化表示過與不及的產品品質管控資訊。此外,我們亦透過個案情節模擬的方式來引導讀者瞭解本評估方法的應用步驟以及該如何處理實務上的應用挑戰:(1)品質指標的適用性及裁適準則與(2)田口損失值的分析觀點與管理意含。最後,建立在本研究的產出基礎上,本研究亦指出3個值得後續探討延伸的未來研究方向。
Excess or deficient quality control and improvement activities cause a decrease in enterprise competitiveness. The quality of a product surpassing the target value indicates that the enterprise has invested too many resources, resulting in lower profits and crowding out resources; whereas the quality of a product falling short of the target value indicates that the enterprise did not invest enough resources, leading to failure in meeting customer expectation and incapability of acceptance. In view of this, this study proposed a quality evaluation method for software products using integration of Taguchi’s loss function and analytic hierarchy process. Information on excess and deficient quality control was quantified and expressed mainly from user quality perspectives. In addition, we guided readers through the evaluation method and application process using case scenario simulation, as well as discussing how to handle application challenges in practice including: (1) the proper guidelines and appropriateness of the quality indicators, and (2) the analytic perspective and management implications of the Taguchi's loss values. Finally, based on the output of this study, we also proposed three future research directions worthy of further investigation.
期刊論文
1.Liao, Chin-Nung、Kao, Hsing-Pei(2010)。Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming。Computers & Industrial Engineering,58(4),571-577。  new window
2.Behkamal, B.、Kahani, M.、Akbari, M. K.(2009)。Customizing ISO 9126 quality model for evaluation of B2B applications。Information and Software Technology,51(3),599-609。  new window
3.Taguchi, G.、Clausing, D.(1990)。Robust Quality。Harvard Business Review,68(1),65-75。  new window
4.Ganeshan, R.、Kulkarni, S.、Boone, T.(2001)。Production economics and process quality: A Taguchi perspective。International Journal of Production Economics,71(1/3),343-350。  new window
5.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.畢威寧、余豐榮(2004)。結合田口損失函數與層級分析法於婚姻仲介服務之應用研究。品質學報,11(1),73-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Jung, H.-W.、Kim, S.-G.、Chung, C.-S.(2004)。Measuring software product quality: a survey of ISO/IEC 9126。IEEE Software,21(5),88-92。  new window
8.Lewis, W. G.、Pun, K. F.、Lalla, T. R. M.(2006)。Empirical investigation of the hard and soft criteria of TQM in ISO 9001 certified small and medium-sized enterprises。International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,23(8),964-985。  new window
9.Mustafa, M. A.、Al-Bahar, J. F.(1991)。Project risk assessment using the analytic hierarchy process。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,38(1),46-52。  new window
10.Rosqvist, T.、Koskela, M.、Harju, H.(2003)。Software quality evaluation based on expert judgement。Software Quality Journal,11(1),39-55。  new window
會議論文
1.Boehm, B. W.、Brown, J. R.、Lipow, M.(1976)。Quantitative evaluation of software quality592-605。  new window
2.Charette, B.(2010)。Why Do Software Projects Fail?。  new window
3.Sauro, J.、Kindlund, E.(2005)。A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score401-409。  new window
研究報告
1.McCall, J.、Richards, P.、Walters, G.(1977)。Factors in Software Quality。  new window
學位論文
1.周文斌(2003)。加權式軟體品質評估模式之建構(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林禎彬(2008)。運用層級分析法及函數式模糊規則建置智慧型手機軟體品質評估系統(碩士論文)。華梵大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴秀樺(2009)。結合AHP與QFD於網路購物服務品質之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Taguchi, G.、Elsayed, E. A.、Hsiang, T. C.(1989)。Quality Engineering in Production Systems。New York, NY:McGraw Hill Publishing Company。  new window
2.Boehm, B. W.(1978)。Characteristics of Software Quality。New York:North Holland。  new window
3.Grady, R. B.(1992)。Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Project Management Institute(2008)。A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge(PMBOK Guide)。PA:PMI, Newton Square。  new window
其他
1.International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2001)。ISO/IEC 9126-1: software engineering --product quality -- part 1: quality model。  new window
2.International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2003)。ISO/IEC TR 9126-2: software engineering -- product quality -- part 2: external metric。  new window
3.International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2003)。ISO/IEC TR 9126-3: software engineering -- product quality -- part 3: internal metrics。  new window
4.International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2004)。ISO/IEC TR 9126-4: software engineering -- product quality -- part 4: quality in use metrics。  new window
5.International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2008)。ISO/IEC 12207: systems and software engineering -- software life cycle processes。  new window
6.International Organization for Standardization (ISO)(2008)。ISO/IEC 15288: systems and software engineering -- system life cycle processes。  new window
7.Neemuchwala, A. A.(2008)。In Search of IT Delivery Excellence。  new window
8.Software Engineering Institute(2006)。CMMI for Development, Version 1.2, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008。  new window
9.The Standish Group(200904)。Chaos summary 2009,http://www.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php, 2009/04/00。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE