Selecting a university in western Taiwan as the case study field, this study applied a qualitative semi-structured interview to consult with ten faculty members sampled purposefully, for the purpose of better understanding the forming reasons, acting patterns, and resulting outcomes of “guerrilla government.” According to the results analyzed from interview data, the forming reasons include “intense situations from organizational change,” “insistence on personal ideals,” “malicious revenge for conflict,” of interest and “coercive bias at the leadership level.” In addition, the acting patterns contain “intentional procrastination,” “being a silent bystander,” “leaking to the media,” “spreading rumors,” and “intercepting complaints.” Moreover, the resulting outcomes are “failure of administrative operation,” “ineffectiveness of administrative leadership,” and “unbalance of administrative ethic.” Accordingly, the path and process of “guerrilla government” are so intertwined and complex that it is impossible to figure out this phenomenon through only one thought as well as one single perspective. Based on the research findings, this study proposed several implications.